CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14225 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-8GPF-9XRV-WWPX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-04 00:30 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:55Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in jsonrpc.cgi in Bugzilla 3.5.x and 3.6.x before 3.6.8, 3.7.x and 4.0.x before 4.0.4, and 4.1.x and 4.2.x before 4.2rc2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that use the JSON-RPC API.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-0440"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-02-02T18:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in jsonrpc.cgi in Bugzilla 3.5.x and 3.6.x before 3.6.8, 3.7.x and 4.0.x before 4.0.4, and 4.1.x and 4.2.x before 4.2rc2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that use the JSON-RPC API.",
"id": "GHSA-8gpf-9xrv-wwpx",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:55:08Z",
"published": "2022-05-04T00:30:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-0440"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718319"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/72882"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/47814"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.bugzilla.org/security/3.4.13"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026623"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-8GQ4-C6JQ-WCQR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-06 21:14 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:45Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Eric Teubert Archivist – Custom Archive Templates plugin <= 1.7.4 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-25448"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-22T15:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Eric Teubert Archivist \u2013 Custom Archive Templates plugin \u003c=\u00a01.7.4 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-8gq4-c6jq-wcqr",
"modified": "2024-04-04T05:45:18Z",
"published": "2023-07-06T21:14:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-25448"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/archivist-custom-archive-templates/wordpress-archivist-custom-archive-templates-plugin-1-7-4-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8GW2-9CR9-MMJ8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:10 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:10Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Vivvo CMS before 4.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-6801"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-05-07T23:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Vivvo CMS before 4.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-8gw2-9cr9-mmj8",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:10:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:10:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-6801"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/45971"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32324"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/49172"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vivvo.net/changelog.php"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-8GWQ-QP6X-5852
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-18 21:30 – Updated: 2022-11-21 03:30Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Mantenimiento web plugin <= 0.13 on WordPress.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-38075"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-11-18T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Mantenimiento web plugin \u003c= 0.13 on WordPress.",
"id": "GHSA-8gwq-qp6x-5852",
"modified": "2022-11-21T03:30:24Z",
"published": "2022-11-18T21:30:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-38075"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/mantenimiento-web/wordpress-mantenimiento-web-plugin-0-13-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability-leading-to-stored-cross-site-scripting-xss?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8GWR-Q26V-P34W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:21 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:21An issue was discovered in idreamsoft iCMS V7.0. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can add a Column via /admincp.php?app=article_category&do=save&frame=iPHP.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-10222"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-04-19T08:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in idreamsoft iCMS V7.0. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can add a Column via /admincp.php?app=article_category\u0026do=save\u0026frame=iPHP.",
"id": "GHSA-8gwr-q26v-p34w",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:21:42Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:21:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-10222"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/idreamsoft/iCMS/issues/21"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8H2J-CGX8-6XV7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-06-10 15:43 – Updated: 2024-09-20 17:18Impact
FastAPI versions lower than 0.65.2 that used cookies for authentication in path operations that received JSON payloads sent by browsers were vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack.
In versions lower than 0.65.2, FastAPI would try to read the request payload as JSON even if the content-type header sent was not set to application/json or a compatible JSON media type (e.g. application/geo+json).
So, a request with a content type of text/plain containing JSON data would be accepted and the JSON data would be extracted.
But requests with content type text/plain are exempt from CORS preflights, for being considered Simple requests. So, the browser would execute them right away including cookies, and the text content could be a JSON string that would be parsed and accepted by the FastAPI application.
Patches
This is fixed in FastAPI 0.65.2.
The request data is now parsed as JSON only if the content-type header is application/json or another JSON compatible media type like application/geo+json.
Workarounds
It's best to upgrade to the latest FastAPI.
But still, it would be possible to add a middleware or a dependency that checks the content-type header and aborts the request if it is not application/json or another JSON compatible content type.
References
For more information
If you have any questions or comments, write to security@tiangolo.com
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "fastapi"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.65.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-32677"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-06-09T13:34:54Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-06-09T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nFastAPI versions lower than `0.65.2` that used cookies for authentication in path operations that received JSON payloads sent by browsers were vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack.\n\nIn versions lower than `0.65.2`, FastAPI would try to read the request payload as JSON even if the `content-type` header sent was not set to `application/json` or a compatible JSON media type (e.g. `application/geo+json`).\n\nSo, a request with a content type of `text/plain` containing JSON data would be accepted and the JSON data would be extracted.\n\nBut requests with content type `text/plain` are exempt from [CORS](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CORS) preflights, for being considered [Simple requests](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CORS#simple_requests). So, the browser would execute them right away including cookies, and the text content could be a JSON string that would be parsed and accepted by the FastAPI application.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis is fixed in FastAPI `0.65.2`.\n\nThe request data is now parsed as JSON only if the `content-type` header is `application/json` or another JSON compatible media type like `application/geo+json`.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIt\u0027s best to upgrade to the latest FastAPI.\n\nBut still, it would be possible to add a middleware or a dependency that checks the `content-type` header and aborts the request if it is not `application/json` or another JSON compatible content type.\n\n### References\n\n* [CORS on Mozilla web docs](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CORS)\n* [This answer on StackExchange](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/157528/ways-to-bypass-browsers-cors-policy/157531#157531)\n* [OWASP CSRF](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/csrf)\n* Fixed in PR [#2118](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/2118)\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments, write to [security@tiangolo.com](mailto:security@tiangolo.com)",
"id": "GHSA-8h2j-cgx8-6xv7",
"modified": "2024-09-20T17:18:26Z",
"published": "2021-06-10T15:43:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/security/advisories/GHSA-8h2j-cgx8-6xv7"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-32677"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/commit/fa7e3c996edf2d5482fff8f9d890ac2390dede4d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/fastapi/PYSEC-2021-100.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MATAWX25TYKNEKLDMKWNLYDB34UWTROA"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in FastAPI"
}
GHSA-8H2R-P64P-MM65
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-17 00:30 – Updated: 2024-01-17 00:30Vulnerability in the Oracle iSupport product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle iSupport. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle iSupport, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle iSupport accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle iSupport accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-20944"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-16T22:15:41Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle iSupport product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle iSupport. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle iSupport, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle iSupport accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle iSupport accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).",
"id": "GHSA-8h2r-p64p-mm65",
"modified": "2024-01-17T00:30:20Z",
"published": "2024-01-17T00:30:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20944"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2024.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8H3C-9J4W-WQXP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:14 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:14MetInfo 7.0.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via admin/?n=admin&c=index&a=doSaveInfo.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-21126"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-09-15T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "MetInfo 7.0.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via admin/?n=admin\u0026c=index\u0026a=doSaveInfo.",
"id": "GHSA-8h3c-9j4w-wqxp",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:14:37Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:14:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-21126"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Echox1/metinfo_csrf/issues/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-8H69-JGR4-JVV3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-11 09:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:55Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pixelgrade PixTypes plugin <= 1.4.14 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-25487"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-07-11T08:15:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pixelgrade PixTypes plugin \u003c=\u00a01.4.14 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-8h69-jgr4-jvv3",
"modified": "2024-04-04T05:55:04Z",
"published": "2023-07-11T09:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-25487"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/pixtypes/wordpress-pixtypes-plugin-1-4-14-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8H72-C6MJ-FFXX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:53 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:53The User::matchEditToken function in includes/User.php in MediaWiki before 1.23.12 and 1.24.x before 1.24.5 does not perform token comparison in constant time before returning, which allows remote attackers to guess the edit token and bypass CSRF protection via a timing attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8624.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-8623"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-03-23T20:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The User::matchEditToken function in includes/User.php in MediaWiki before 1.23.12 and 1.24.x before 1.24.5 does not perform token comparison in constant time before returning, which allows remote attackers to guess the edit token and bypass CSRF protection via a timing attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8624.",
"id": "GHSA-8h72-c6mj-ffxx",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:53:40Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:53:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-8623"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/156336/5/includes/User.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/mediawiki-announce/2015-December/000186.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119309"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/12/21/8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/12/23/7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.