Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-352

Allowed

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

14177 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-7X2Q-44VG-C7FH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-11-17 00:31 – Updated: 2023-11-22 18:30
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kiboko Labs Arigato Autoresponder and Newsletter plugin <= 2.7.2.2 versions.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-47686"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-11-16T23:15:08Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kiboko Labs Arigato Autoresponder and Newsletter plugin \u003c=\u00a02.7.2.2 versions.",
  "id": "GHSA-7x2q-44vg-c7fh",
  "modified": "2023-11-22T18:30:54Z",
  "published": "2023-11-17T00:31:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-47686"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/bft-autoresponder/wordpress-arigato-autoresponder-and-newsletter-plugin-2-7-2-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7X3G-Q3PP-H6VC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-27 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Eli EZ SQL Reports Shortcode Widget and DB Backup allows SQL Injection. This issue affects EZ SQL Reports Shortcode Widget and DB Backup: from n/a through 5.25.08.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-30788"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-27T11:15:40Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Eli EZ SQL Reports Shortcode Widget and DB Backup allows SQL Injection. This issue affects EZ SQL Reports Shortcode Widget and DB Backup: from n/a through 5.25.08.",
  "id": "GHSA-7x3g-q3pp-h6vc",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:06Z",
  "published": "2025-03-27T12:30:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30788"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/elisqlreports/vulnerability/wordpress-ez-sql-reports-shortcode-widget-and-db-backup-plugin-5-25-08-csrf-to-sql-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7X69-VJ7P-23WV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:02 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:02
VLAI
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion 8.0, 8.0.1, 9.0, and 9.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-0629"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-06-16T23:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion 8.0, 8.0.1, 9.0, and 9.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-7x69-vj7p-23wv",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T02:02:02Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T02:02:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0629"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/68027"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb11-14.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-7X6P-WQ8H-XH5W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-11 12:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:56
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Muneeb Layer Slider plugin <= 1.1.9.7 versions.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-23671"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-07-11T12:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Muneeb Layer Slider plugin \u003c=\u00a01.1.9.7 versions.",
  "id": "GHSA-7x6p-wq8h-xh5w",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T05:56:06Z",
  "published": "2023-07-11T12:30:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-23671"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/slider-slideshow/wordpress-layer-slider-plugin-1-1-9-6-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-leading-to-post-page-deletion-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7X8H-HFCR-M4C6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-21 21:30 – Updated: 2022-11-23 18:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in the "/admin/wlmultipleap.asp" of optilink OP-XT71000N version: V2.2 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to create Multiple WLAN BSSID.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-23582"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-11-21T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the \"/admin/wlmultipleap.asp\" of optilink OP-XT71000N version: V2.2 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to create Multiple WLAN BSSID.",
  "id": "GHSA-7x8h-hfcr-m4c6",
  "modified": "2022-11-23T18:30:26Z",
  "published": "2022-11-21T21:30:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-23582"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/huzaifahussain98/CVE-2020-23582"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7X9J-GHJR-74HQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-11 12:00 – Updated: 2022-10-11 19:00
VLAI
Details

The Disable User Login WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks when updating its settings, allowing unauthenticated attackers to block (or unblock) users at will.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-2350"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-10-10T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Disable User Login WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks when updating its settings, allowing unauthenticated attackers to block (or unblock) users at will.",
  "id": "GHSA-7x9j-ghjr-74hq",
  "modified": "2022-10-11T19:00:25Z",
  "published": "2022-10-11T12:00:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2350"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/de28543b-c110-4a9f-bfe9-febccfba3a96"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7XCF-8VFW-JVW5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:10 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:10
VLAI
Details

The WP Fusion Lite WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the show_logs_section function found in the ~/includes/admin/logging/class-log-handler.php file which allows attackers to drop all logs for the plugin, in versions up to and including 3.37.18.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-34661"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-08-09T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The WP Fusion Lite WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the `show_logs_section` function found in the ~/includes/admin/logging/class-log-handler.php file which allows attackers to drop all logs for the plugin, in versions up to and including 3.37.18.",
  "id": "GHSA-7xcf-8vfw-jvw5",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:10:26Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:10:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34661"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-fusion-lite/trunk/includes/admin/logging/class-log-handler.php?rev=2533608#L302"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/vulnerability-advisories/#CVE-2021-34661"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-7XCM-V3RC-GJWQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-01 06:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:19
VLAI
Details

The Cool Timeline (Horizontal & Vertical Timeline) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ctl_save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save field icons via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-36738"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-07-01T04:15:10Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Cool Timeline (Horizontal \u0026 Vertical Timeline) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ctl_save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save field icons via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
  "id": "GHSA-7xcm-v3rc-gjwq",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T05:19:38Z",
  "published": "2023-07-01T06:30:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36738"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/25-wordpress-plugins-vulnerable-to-csrf-attacks"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/more-wordpress-plugins-and-themes-vulnerable-to-csrf-attacks"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2368335/cool-timeline/trunk/fa-icons/fa-icons-class.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/1ce7c895-e94c-46bd-9de1-f5fde29c3475?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7XGJ-J9HP-C692

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-05-16 18:30 – Updated: 2023-05-30 15:40
VLAI
Summary
Jenkins WSO2 Oauth Plugin cross-site request forgery vulnerability
Details

Jenkins WSO2 Oauth Plugin 1.0 and earlier does not implement a state parameter in its OAuth flow, a unique and non-guessable value associated with each authentication request.

This vulnerability allows attackers to trick users into logging in to the attacker’s account.

As of publication of this advisory, there is no fix.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:wso2id-oauth"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-33006"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-05-17T03:46:11Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-05-16T17:15:12Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Jenkins WSO2 Oauth Plugin 1.0 and earlier does not implement a state parameter in its OAuth flow, a unique and non-guessable value associated with each authentication request. \n\nThis vulnerability allows attackers to trick users into logging in to the attacker\u2019s account.\n\nAs of publication of this advisory, there is no fix.",
  "id": "GHSA-7xgj-j9hp-c692",
  "modified": "2023-05-30T15:40:49Z",
  "published": "2023-05-16T18:30:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-33006"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2023-05-16/#SECURITY-2990"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Jenkins WSO2 Oauth Plugin cross-site request forgery vulnerability"
}

GHSA-7XJ3-67HV-X5FP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-01 00:34 – Updated: 2026-07-01 21:36
VLAI
Details

Inappropriate implementation in ScriptInjections in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-13946"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-30T23:17:08Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Inappropriate implementation in ScriptInjections in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)",
  "id": "GHSA-7xj3-67hv-x5fp",
  "modified": "2026-07-01T21:36:04Z",
  "published": "2026-07-01T00:34:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-13946"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0175352312.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/513274039"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
  • Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Implementation

Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
  • When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
  • Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
  • This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.

Mitigation
Implementation

Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)

An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.

CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing

An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.

CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification

An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).

CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery

An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.