CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14169 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-7JPM-7CVW-X3PH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-17 00:30 – Updated: 2024-04-17 00:30Vulnerability in the Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: LOV). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-21032"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-16T22:15:19Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: LOV). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).",
"id": "GHSA-7jpm-7cvw-x3ph",
"modified": "2024-04-17T00:30:55Z",
"published": "2024-04-17T00:30:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21032"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2024.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7JQ2-GFFJ-PVF8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-05-05 21:31 – Updated: 2023-05-05 21:31Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository unilogies/bumsys prior to 2.1.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-2552"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-05T20:15:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository unilogies/bumsys prior to 2.1.1.",
"id": "GHSA-7jq2-gffj-pvf8",
"modified": "2023-05-05T21:31:11Z",
"published": "2023-05-05T21:31:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2552"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/unilogies/bumsys/commit/86e29dd23df348ec6075f0c0de8e06b8d9fb0a9a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.dev/bounties/ab0b4655-f57a-4113-849b-2237eeb75b32"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7JQC-C63X-GF5W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:44 – Updated: 2023-02-27 15:30The WebDorado Contact Form Builder plugin before 1.0.69 for WordPress allows CSRF via the wp-admin/admin-ajax.php action parameter, with resultant local file inclusion via directory traversal, because there can be a discrepancy between the $_POST['action'] value and the $_GET['action'] value, and the latter is unsanitized.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-11557"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-04-26T22:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The WebDorado Contact Form Builder plugin before 1.0.69 for WordPress allows CSRF via the wp-admin/admin-ajax.php action parameter, with resultant local file inclusion via directory traversal, because there can be a discrepancy between the $_POST[\u0027action\u0027] value and the $_GET[\u0027action\u0027] value, and the latter is unsanitized.",
"id": "GHSA-7jqc-c63x-gf5w",
"modified": "2023-02-27T15:30:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:44:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11557"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.openwall.net/full-disclosure/2019/04/23/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/contact-form-builder/#developers"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpvulndb.com/vulnerabilities/9260"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Apr/35"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7JQH-7H8F-7555
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:04 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:04Gleez CMS 1.2.0 has CSRF, as demonstrated by a /page/add request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-13340"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-07-05T22:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Gleez CMS 1.2.0 has CSRF, as demonstrated by a /page/add request.",
"id": "GHSA-7jqh-7h8f-7555",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:04:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:04:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13340"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gleez/cms/issues/795"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7JQP-HVHQ-V878
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-27 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in lucidcrew WP Forum Server allows Stored XSS. This issue affects WP Forum Server: from n/a through 1.8.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-53305"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-27T14:15:52Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in lucidcrew WP Forum Server allows Stored XSS. This issue affects WP Forum Server: from n/a through 1.8.2.",
"id": "GHSA-7jqp-hvhq-v878",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:38Z",
"published": "2025-06-27T15:31:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-53305"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/forum-server/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-forum-server-plugin-1-8-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7JRP-8F7V-P43H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-28 15:30 – Updated: 2025-09-08 18:31QuickCMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in page deletion functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the admin, will automatically send a POST request deleting an article.
The vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version 6.8 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested and might also be vulnerable.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-54541"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-28T11:15:32Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "QuickCMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in page deletion functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the admin, will automatically send a POST request deleting an article.\n\nThe vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn\u0027t respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version 6.8 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested and might also be vulnerable.",
"id": "GHSA-7jrp-8f7v-p43h",
"modified": "2025-09-08T18:31:27Z",
"published": "2025-08-28T15:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-54541"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2025/08/CVE-2025-54540"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://opensolution.org"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-7JRR-FWHW-762V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-12 18:30 – Updated: 2023-07-20 14:29Jenkins Sumologic Publisher Plugin 2.2.1 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation.
This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL.
Additionally, this form validation method does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:sumologic-publisher"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2.2.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-37958"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-12T22:30:57Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-07-12T16:15:13Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Jenkins Sumologic Publisher Plugin 2.2.1 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation.\n\nThis allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL.\n\nAdditionally, this form validation method does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-7jrr-fwhw-762v",
"modified": "2023-07-20T14:29:55Z",
"published": "2023-07-12T18:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-37958"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2023-07-12/#SECURITY-3117"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/12/2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Jenkins Sumologic Publisher Plugin vulnerable to cross-site request forgery"
}
GHSA-7JVC-97HQ-CQ55
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-18 18:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AdFoxly AdFoxly – Ad Manager, AdSense Ads & Ads.Txt.This issue affects AdFoxly – Ad Manager, AdSense Ads & Ads.Txt: from n/a through 1.8.5.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-46617"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-12-18T17:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AdFoxly AdFoxly \u2013 Ad Manager, AdSense Ads \u0026 Ads.Txt.This issue affects AdFoxly \u2013 Ad Manager, AdSense Ads \u0026 Ads.Txt: from n/a through 1.8.5.",
"id": "GHSA-7jvc-97hq-cq55",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:33:24Z",
"published": "2023-12-18T18:30:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-46617"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/adfoxly/wordpress-adfoxly-ad-manager-adsense-ads-ads-txt-plugin-1-8-5-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7JVG-55FH-9687
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:54 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:48The bbp-move-topics plugin before 1.1.6 for WordPress has CSRF.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-21006"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-08-27T12:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The bbp-move-topics plugin before 1.1.6 for WordPress has CSRF.",
"id": "GHSA-7jvg-55fh-9687",
"modified": "2024-04-04T01:48:46Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:54:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-21006"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/bbp-move-topics/#developers"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7JXM-JC9J-6CM5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:16 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:16IBM Emptoris Strategic Supply Management Platform 10.0.0.x through 10.1.1.x is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 120657.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-1097"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-09-05T21:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "IBM Emptoris Strategic Supply Management Platform 10.0.0.x through 10.1.1.x is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 120657.",
"id": "GHSA-7jxm-jc9j-6cm5",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:16:31Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:16:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-1097"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/120657"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22006963"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.