CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14228 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-56V7-G448-VFFV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-09 18:31 – Updated: 2025-09-09 18:31CSRF in Ivanti Connect Secure before 22.7R2.9 or 22.8R2, Ivanti Policy Secure before 22.7R1.6, Ivanti ZTA Gateway before 2.8R2.3-723 and Ivanti Neurons for Secure Access before 22.8R1.4 (Fix deployed on 02-Aug-2025) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute sensitive actions on behalf of the victim user. User interaction is required
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-55147"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-09T16:15:35Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "CSRF in Ivanti Connect Secure before 22.7R2.9 or 22.8R2, Ivanti Policy Secure before 22.7R1.6, Ivanti ZTA Gateway before 2.8R2.3-723 and Ivanti Neurons for Secure Access before 22.8R1.4 (Fix deployed on 02-Aug-2025) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute sensitive actions on behalf of the victim user. User interaction is required",
"id": "GHSA-56v7-g448-vffv",
"modified": "2025-09-09T18:31:18Z",
"published": "2025-09-09T18:31:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-55147"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://forums.ivanti.com/s/article/September-Security-Advisory-Ivanti-Connect-Secure-Policy-Secure-ZTA-Gateways-and-Neurons-for-Secure-Access-Multiple-CVEs?language=en_US"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-56VQ-F9PV-PPJP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-15 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pauple Table & Contact Form 7 Database – Tablesome.This issue affects Table & Contact Form 7 Database – Tablesome: from n/a through 1.0.25.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-31388"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-15T11:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pauple Table \u0026 Contact Form 7 Database \u2013 Tablesome.This issue affects Table \u0026 Contact Form 7 Database \u2013 Tablesome: from n/a through 1.0.25.",
"id": "GHSA-56vq-f9pv-ppjp",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:34:44Z",
"published": "2024-04-15T12:30:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31388"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/tablesome/wordpress-tablesome-plugin-1-0-25-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-56WF-MX5C-FFJX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:22 – Updated: 2022-12-29 01:12A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Zephyr for JIRA Test Management Plugin 1.5 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server using attacker-specified username and password.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:zephyr-for-jira-test-management"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-2215"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-12-29T01:12:25Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2020-07-02T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Zephyr for JIRA Test Management Plugin 1.5 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server using attacker-specified username and password.",
"id": "GHSA-56wf-mx5c-ffjx",
"modified": "2022-12-29T01:12:25Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:22:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-2215"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/zephyr-for-jira-test-management-plugin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jenkins.io/security/advisory/2020-07-02/#SECURITY-1762"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/07/02/7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins Zephyr for JIRA Test Management Plugin"
}
GHSA-56X8-XRH8-MX93
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-15 12:00 – Updated: 2022-11-17 06:30Konker v2.3.9 was to discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-35613"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-11-15T00:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Konker v2.3.9 was to discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).",
"id": "GHSA-56x8-xrh8-mx93",
"modified": "2022-11-17T06:30:20Z",
"published": "2022-11-15T12:00:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-35613"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://securityblog101.blogspot.com/2022/10/cve-id-cve-2022-35613.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-56XX-PV88-2662
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:30 – Updated: 2024-04-25 22:56PyroCMS 3.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) via the admin/pages/delete/ URI: pages will be deleted.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "pyrocms/pyrocms"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "3.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-25262"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-25T22:56:10Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2020-10-08T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "PyroCMS 3.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) via the `admin/pages/delete/` URI: pages will be deleted.",
"id": "GHSA-56xx-pv88-2662",
"modified": "2024-04-25T22:56:11Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:30:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-25262"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/farid007/2af454d909fa5a60a07e4e547e99964e"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/pyrocms/pyrocms"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "PyroCMS Vulnerable to CSRF"
}
GHSA-5733-3XH5-V4MQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:25 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:25An issue was discovered in /admin/?/user/add in Frog CMS 0.9.5. The application's add user functionality suffers from CSRF. A malicious user can craft an HTML page and use it to trick a victim into clicking on it; once executed, a malicious user will be created with admin privileges. This happens due to lack of an anti-CSRF token in state modification requests.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-8908"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-03-31T22:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in /admin/?/user/add in Frog CMS 0.9.5. The application\u0027s add user functionality suffers from CSRF. A malicious user can craft an HTML page and use it to trick a victim into clicking on it; once executed, a malicious user will be created with admin privileges. This happens due to lack of an anti-CSRF token in state modification requests.",
"id": "GHSA-5733-3xh5-v4mq",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:25:23Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:25:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-8908"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44383"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitywarrior9.blogspot.in/2018/03/cross-site-request-forgery-frog-cms-cve.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-573H-C24J-7P83
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:14 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:14The Email Artillery (MASS EMAIL) WordPress plugin through 4.1 does not properly check the uploaded files from the Import Emails feature, allowing arbitrary files to be uploaded. Furthermore, the plugin is also lacking any CSRF check, allowing such issue to be exploited via a CSRF attack as well. However, due to the presence of a .htaccess, denying access to everything in the folder the file is uploaded to, the malicious uploaded file will only be accessible on Web Servers such as Nginx/IIS
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-24490"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-09-13T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Email Artillery (MASS EMAIL) WordPress plugin through 4.1 does not properly check the uploaded files from the Import Emails feature, allowing arbitrary files to be uploaded. Furthermore, the plugin is also lacking any CSRF check, allowing such issue to be exploited via a CSRF attack as well. However, due to the presence of a .htaccess, denying access to everything in the folder the file is uploaded to, the malicious uploaded file will only be accessible on Web Servers such as Nginx/IIS",
"id": "GHSA-573h-c24j-7p83",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:14:20Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:14:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-24490"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/4ea0127e-afef-41bf-a005-c57432f9f58c"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-573V-FPJ9-9QH6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-28 00:01 – Updated: 2022-07-08 00:00The New User Approve WordPress plugin before 2.4 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings and adding invitation codes, which could allow attackers to add invitation codes (for bypassing the provided restrictions) and to change plugin settings by tricking admin users into visiting specially crafted websites.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-1625"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-06-27T09:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The New User Approve WordPress plugin before 2.4 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings and adding invitation codes, which could allow attackers to add invitation codes (for bypassing the provided restrictions) and to change plugin settings by tricking admin users into visiting specially crafted websites.",
"id": "GHSA-573v-fpj9-9qh6",
"modified": "2022-07-08T00:00:46Z",
"published": "2022-06-28T00:01:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1625"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/e1693318-900c-47f1-bb77-008b0d33327f"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-574W-VGXR-28W8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-22 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Epsiloncool WP Fast Total Search allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Fast Total Search: from n/a through 1.79.270.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-57893"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-22T12:15:33Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Epsiloncool WP Fast Total Search allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Fast Total Search: from n/a through 1.79.270.",
"id": "GHSA-574w-vgxr-28w8",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:57Z",
"published": "2025-08-22T12:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-57893"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/fulltext-search/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-fast-total-search-plugin-1-79-270-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-574X-MJV8-VPW7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-06 21:15 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:46Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in utahta WP Social Bookmarking Light plugin <= 2.0.7 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-25029"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-26T14:15:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in utahta WP Social Bookmarking Light plugin \u003c=\u00a02.0.7 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-574x-mjv8-vpw7",
"modified": "2024-04-04T05:46:58Z",
"published": "2023-07-06T21:15:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-25029"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/wp-social-bookmarking-light/wordpress-wp-social-bookmarking-light-plugin-2-0-7-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.