CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14239 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-455P-P2RC-9MRR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:55 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:53iF.SVNAdmin through 1.6.2 allows svnadmin/usercreate.php CSRF to create a user.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-15128"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-09-06T22:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "iF.SVNAdmin through 1.6.2 allows svnadmin/usercreate.php CSRF to create a user.",
"id": "GHSA-455p-p2rc-9mrr",
"modified": "2024-04-04T01:53:33Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:55:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-15128"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://zeroauth.ltd/blog/2019/08/23/cve-2019-15128-if-svnadmin-through-1-6-2-allows-svnadmin-usercreate-php-csrf-to-create-a-user"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-456W-4CFV-54MF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-13 18:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 08:38Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PINPOINT.WORLD Pinpoint Booking System plugin <= 2.9.9.4.0 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-45270"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-10-13T16:15:12Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PINPOINT.WORLD Pinpoint Booking System plugin \u003c=\u00a02.9.9.4.0 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-456w-4cfv-54mf",
"modified": "2024-04-04T08:38:13Z",
"published": "2023-10-13T18:30:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-45270"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/booking-system/wordpress-pinpoint-booking-system-plugin-2-9-9-4-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-457F-WG3H-7VW8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:21 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:21The Symantec Content Analysis (CA) 1.3, 2.x prior to 2.2.1.1, and Mail Threat Defense (MTD) 1.1 management consoles are susceptible to a cross-site request forging (CSRF) vulnerability. A remote attacker can use phishing or other social engineering techniques to access the management console with the privileges of an authenticated administrator user.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-9092"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-05-11T14:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Symantec Content Analysis (CA) 1.3, 2.x prior to 2.2.1.1, and Mail Threat Defense (MTD) 1.1 management consoles are susceptible to a cross-site request forging (CSRF) vulnerability. A remote attacker can use phishing or other social engineering techniques to access the management console with the privileges of an authenticated administrator user.",
"id": "GHSA-457f-wg3h-7vw8",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:21:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:21:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9092"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.symantec.com/security-center/network-protection-security-advisories/SA149"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104182"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-457M-59W6-W674
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-15 15:31 – Updated: 2025-09-15 15:31A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in the Profile Page of the PHPGurukul Student-Result-Management-System-Using-PHP-V2.0. This flaw allows an attacker to trick authenticated users into unintentionally modifying their account details. By crafting a malicious HTML page, an attacker can submit unauthorized requests to the vulnerable endpoint: /create-class.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-56710"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-15T14:15:43Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in the Profile Page of the PHPGurukul Student-Result-Management-System-Using-PHP-V2.0. This flaw allows an attacker to trick authenticated users into unintentionally modifying their account details. By crafting a malicious HTML page, an attacker can submit unauthorized requests to the vulnerable endpoint: /create-class.php.",
"id": "GHSA-457m-59w6-w674",
"modified": "2025-09-15T15:31:24Z",
"published": "2025-09-15T15:31:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-56710"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://medium.com/@mrshaikh841/csrf-pocs-1c96d9305298"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4588-CPVG-RGR5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:45 – Updated: 2024-04-04 00:30This vulnerability was caused by an incomplete fix to CVE-2017-0911. Twitter Kit for iOS versions 3.0 to 3.4.0 is vulnerable to a callback verification flaw in the "Login with Twitter" component allowing an attacker to provide alternate credentials. In the final step of "Login with Twitter" authentication information is passed back to the application using the registered custom URL scheme (typically twitterkit-) on iOS. Because the callback handler did not verify the authenticity of the response, this step is vulnerable to forgery, potentially allowing attacker to associate a Twitter account with a third-party service.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-5431"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-345",
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-05-06T17:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "This vulnerability was caused by an incomplete fix to CVE-2017-0911. Twitter Kit for iOS versions 3.0 to 3.4.0 is vulnerable to a callback verification flaw in the \"Login with Twitter\" component allowing an attacker to provide alternate credentials. In the final step of \"Login with Twitter\" authentication information is passed back to the application using the registered custom URL scheme (typically twitterkit-\u003cconsumer-key\u003e) on iOS. Because the callback handler did not verify the authenticity of the response, this step is vulnerable to forgery, potentially allowing attacker to associate a Twitter account with a third-party service.",
"id": "GHSA-4588-cpvg-rgr5",
"modified": "2024-04-04T00:30:40Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:45:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-5431"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.twitter.com/developer/en_us/topics/tips/2018/vulnerability-in-twitter-kit-for-ios.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4595-95WG-87WC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-11 21:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ZipList ZipList Recipe allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects ZipList Recipe: from n/a through 3.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-28868"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-11T21:15:44Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ZipList ZipList Recipe allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects ZipList Recipe: from n/a through 3.1.",
"id": "GHSA-4595-95wg-87wc",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:56Z",
"published": "2025-03-11T21:30:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-28868"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/ziplist-recipe-plugin/vulnerability/wordpress-ziplist-recipe-plugin-3-1-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-459C-PFXM-X98G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:35 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:35A vulnerability in the web framework of Cisco Prime Service Catalog could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a lack of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking the user of a web application into executing an adverse action. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg30313.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-0107"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-01-18T06:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in the web framework of Cisco Prime Service Catalog could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a lack of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking the user of a web application into executing an adverse action. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg30313.",
"id": "GHSA-459c-pfxm-x98g",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:35:49Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:35:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0107"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180117-psc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102719"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040244"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-45CC-J36M-HXQ2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-21 00:00 – Updated: 2022-06-29 00:00A vulnerability was found in Supsystic Popup Plugin 1.7.6 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-20065"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-06-20T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in Supsystic Popup Plugin 1.7.6 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
"id": "GHSA-45cc-j36m-hxq2",
"modified": "2022-06-29T00:00:26Z",
"published": "2022-06-21T00:00:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-20065"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://map.httpcs.com/alert/284665"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.97385"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41485"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Feb/97"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-45FH-J4QP-56JM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:17 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:17CSRF in login.asp on Ruckus devices allows an attacker to access the panel, and use SSRF to perform scraping or other analysis via the SUBCA-1 field on the Wireless Admin screen.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-8830"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-05-05T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "CSRF in login.asp on Ruckus devices allows an attacker to access the panel, and use SSRF to perform scraping or other analysis via the SUBCA-1 field on the Wireless Admin screen.",
"id": "GHSA-45fh-j4qp-56jm",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:17:13Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:17:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-8830"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/CyberSecurityUP/26c5b032897630fe8407da4a8ef216d4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-45FV-HG56-QGCJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-12 06:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 06:01The WP Prayer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.6.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save() and export() functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save plugin settings and trigger a data export via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-4412"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-07-12T04:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WP Prayer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.6.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save() and export() functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save plugin settings and trigger a data export via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-45fv-hg56-qgcj",
"modified": "2024-04-04T06:01:04Z",
"published": "2023-07-12T06:30:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-4412"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/25-wordpress-plugins-vulnerable-to-csrf-attacks"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/more-wordpress-plugins-and-themes-vulnerable-to-csrf-attacks"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=2543740%40wp-prayer\u0026new=2543740%40wp-prayer\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/a7efbdb1-989f-4171-ab55-aff66014337a?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.