CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14242 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-3RW3-4F78-WJRX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-20 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Avchat.Net AVChat Video Chat allows Stored XSS.This issue affects AVChat Video Chat: from n/a through 2.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-49605"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-20T10:15:03Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Avchat.Net AVChat Video Chat allows Stored XSS.This issue affects AVChat Video Chat: from n/a through 2.2.",
"id": "GHSA-3rw3-4f78-wjrx",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:07Z",
"published": "2024-10-20T12:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49605"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/avchat-3/vulnerability/wordpress-community-lite-video-chat-plugin-2-2-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/avchat-3/wordpress-community-lite-video-chat-plugin-2-2-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3RXF-WH5P-MPFX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-17 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in realmag777 FOX – Currency Switcher Professional for WooCommerce.This issue affects FOX – Currency Switcher Professional for WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.4.1.4.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-49834"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-12-17T11:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in realmag777 FOX \u2013 Currency Switcher Professional for WooCommerce.This issue affects FOX \u2013 Currency Switcher Professional for WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.4.1.4.",
"id": "GHSA-3rxf-wh5p-mpfx",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:33:23Z",
"published": "2023-12-17T12:30:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-49834"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/woocommerce-currency-switcher/wordpress-fox-currency-switcher-professional-for-woocommerce-plugin-1-4-1-4-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3RXW-2675-C3J9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-09 06:30 – Updated: 2024-09-09 15:30The AZIndex WordPress plugin through 0.8.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin delete arbitrary indexes via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-7688"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-09T06:15:02Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The AZIndex WordPress plugin through 0.8.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin delete arbitrary indexes via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-3rxw-2675-c3j9",
"modified": "2024-09-09T15:30:40Z",
"published": "2024-09-09T06:30:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-7688"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/6c1d4354-b88b-46ca-b25a-efb9518f4955"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3RXX-8F33-7P6P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-29 03:33 – Updated: 2024-12-16 21:31Concrete CMS before 8.5.14 and 9 before 9.2.3 allows Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via ccm/calendar/dialogs/event/delete/submit. An attacker can force an admin to delete events on the site because the event ID is numeric and sequential.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "concrete5/concrete5"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.5.14"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "concrete5/concrete5"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "9.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "9.2.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-48653"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-02-29T20:10:02Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-29T01:41:34Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Concrete CMS before 8.5.14 and 9 before 9.2.3 allows Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via ccm/calendar/dialogs/event/delete/submit. An attacker can force an admin to delete events on the site because the event ID is numeric and sequential.",
"id": "GHSA-3rxx-8f33-7p6p",
"modified": "2024-12-16T21:31:40Z",
"published": "2024-02-29T03:33:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-48653"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/concretecms/concretecms/commit/077755e6bbbc1c67b7508add9e3d207e8d8909a0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/concretecms/concretecms/commit/5b93470bcccf271810d3a0b190368ce6a9d6c84b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://documentation.concretecms.org/developers/introduction/version-history/923-release-notes"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/concretecms/concretecms"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.concretecms.org/about/project-news/security/2023-12-05-concrete-cms-new-cves-and-cve-updates"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Concrete CMS Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability"
}
GHSA-3V24-CP75-HV5G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:37 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:37Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in accounts/admin/index.php in Vessio NetBill 1.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add accounts via a new-client action.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-6631"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-01-16T21:56:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in accounts/admin/index.php in Vessio NetBill 1.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add accounts via a new-client action.",
"id": "GHSA-3v24-cp75-hv5g",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:37:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:37:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-6631"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/75539"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/112655/NetBill-Billing-System-1.2-CSRF-XSS.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/49109"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/81881"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=560"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-3V25-95XX-R27W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:24 – Updated: 2025-04-09 03:45Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in wp-newblog.php in WordPress multi-user (MU) 1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the weblog_id parameter (Username field).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-4544"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-08-27T23:17:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in wp-newblog.php in WordPress multi-user (MU) 1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the weblog_id parameter (Username field).",
"id": "GHSA-3v25-95xx-r27w",
"modified": "2025-04-09T03:45:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:24:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4544"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/38442"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityvulns.ru/Rdocument875.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://websecurity.com.ua/1269"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/482006/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-3V29-G9XV-3C6V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-03 18:31 – Updated: 2026-03-04 18:31A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nokia IMPACT through 19.11.2.10-20210118042150283 allows a remote attacker to import and overwrite the entire application configuration. Specifically, in /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import, neither the X-CSRF-NONCE HTTP header nor the CSRF-NONCE cookie is validated.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-35486"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-03T18:16:21Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nokia IMPACT through 19.11.2.10-20210118042150283 allows a remote attacker to import and overwrite the entire application configuration. Specifically, in /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import, neither the X-CSRF-NONCE HTTP header nor the CSRF-NONCE cookie is validated.",
"id": "GHSA-3v29-g9xv-3c6v",
"modified": "2026-03-04T18:31:49Z",
"published": "2026-03-03T18:31:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-35486"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.gruppotim.it/it/footer/red-team/2021/Motive-Impact-CVE-2021-35486.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.nokia.com/networks/solutions/impact-iot-platform"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.nokia.com/notices/responsible-disclosure"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3V46-43QJ-3VPG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-19 00:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in gVectors Team WooDiscuz – WooCommerce Comments.This issue affects WooDiscuz – WooCommerce Comments: from n/a through 2.3.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-49759"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-12-18T23:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in gVectors Team WooDiscuz \u2013 WooCommerce Comments.This issue affects WooDiscuz \u2013 WooCommerce Comments: from n/a through 2.3.0.",
"id": "GHSA-3v46-43qj-3vpg",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:33:25Z",
"published": "2023-12-19T00:30:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-49759"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/woodiscuz-woocommerce-comments/wordpress-woodiscuz-woocommerce-comments-plugin-2-3-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3V49-F236-JV89
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-23 00:00 – Updated: 2022-08-26 00:03The WP Coder WordPress plugin before 2.5.3 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting code created by the plugin, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary ones via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-2388"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-08-22T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WP Coder WordPress plugin before 2.5.3 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting code created by the plugin, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary ones via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-3v49-f236-jv89",
"modified": "2022-08-26T00:03:36Z",
"published": "2022-08-23T00:00:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2388"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/50acd35f-eb31-4aba-bf32-b390e9514beb"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3V4M-W579-RRR3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-01 00:00 – Updated: 2022-03-08 00:00The Orange Form WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks in all of its AJAX calls, for example the or_delete_filed one which is available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users could allow attackers to delete arbitrary posts.The AJAX calls performing actions on posts also do not ensure that the post belong to them (or that they are allowed to perform such action on it)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-24688"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-02-28T09:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Orange Form WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks in all of its AJAX calls, for example the or_delete_filed one which is available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users could allow attackers to delete arbitrary posts.The AJAX calls performing actions on posts also do not ensure that the post belong to them (or that they are allowed to perform such action on it)",
"id": "GHSA-3v4m-w579-rrr3",
"modified": "2022-03-08T00:00:38Z",
"published": "2022-03-01T00:00:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-24688"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/78bc7cf1-7563-4ada-aec9-af4c943e3e2c"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.