CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14159 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-XW6C-FFPM-FGCM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-24 00:31 – Updated: 2026-02-24 00:31Bludit version 3.16.1 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the /admin/uninstall-plugin/ and /admin/install-theme/ endpoints. The application does not implement anti-CSRF tokens or other request origin validation mechanisms for these administrative actions. An attacker can induce an authenticated administrator to visit a malicious page that silently submits crafted requests, resulting in unauthorized plugin uninstallation or theme installation. This may lead to loss of functionality, execution of untrusted code via malicious themes, and compromise of system integrity.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-27741"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-23T22:16:25Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Bludit version 3.16.1 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the /admin/uninstall-plugin/ and /admin/install-theme/ endpoints. The application does not implement anti-CSRF tokens or other request origin validation mechanisms for these administrative actions. An attacker can induce an authenticated administrator to visit a malicious page that silently submits crafted requests, resulting in unauthorized plugin uninstallation or theme installation. This may lead to loss of functionality, execution of untrusted code via malicious themes, and compromise of system integrity.",
"id": "GHSA-xw6c-ffpm-fgcm",
"modified": "2026-02-24T00:31:33Z",
"published": "2026-02-24T00:31:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-27741"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/bludit/bludit/issues/1577"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/bludit-csrf-in-plugin-and-theme-management-endpoints"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-XW6J-MQ6V-PMV6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-05-16 18:30 – Updated: 2023-05-17 02:42Jenkins SAML Single Sign On(SSO) Plugin 2.0.2 and earlier does not perform permission checks in multiple HTTP endpoints.
This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to send an HTTP request to an attacker-specified URL and parse the response as XML, or parse a local file on the Jenkins controller as XML.
As the plugin does not configure its XML parser to prevent XML external entity (XXE) attacks, attackers can have Jenkins parse a crafted XML response that uses external entities for extraction of secrets from the Jenkins controller or server-side request forgery.
Additionally, these HTTP endpoints do not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
SAML Single Sign On(SSO) Plugin 2.1.0 requires POST requests and Overall/Administer permission for the affected HTTP endpoints.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "io.jenkins.plugins:miniorange-saml-sp"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-32991"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-05-17T02:42:50Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-16T17:15:11Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Jenkins SAML Single Sign On(SSO) Plugin 2.0.2 and earlier does not perform permission checks in multiple HTTP endpoints.\n\nThis allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to send an HTTP request to an attacker-specified URL and parse the response as XML, or parse a local file on the Jenkins controller as XML.\n\nAs the plugin does not configure its XML parser to prevent XML external entity (XXE) attacks, attackers can have Jenkins parse a crafted XML response that uses external entities for extraction of secrets from the Jenkins controller or server-side request forgery.\n\nAdditionally, these HTTP endpoints do not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.\n\nSAML Single Sign On(SSO) Plugin 2.1.0 requires POST requests and Overall/Administer permission for the affected HTTP endpoints.",
"id": "GHSA-xw6j-mq6v-pmv6",
"modified": "2023-05-17T02:42:50Z",
"published": "2023-05-16T18:30:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32991"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2023-05-16/#SECURITY-2993"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Jenkins SAML Single Sign On(SSO) Plugin Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability"
}
GHSA-XW78-VX8X-R728
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 06:11 – Updated: 2022-05-02 06:11Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the ACL Manager plugin (plugins/acl/ajax.php) in DokuWiki before 2009-12-25c allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify access control rules, and other unspecified requests, via unknown vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-0289"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-02-15T18:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the ACL Manager plugin (plugins/acl/ajax.php) in DokuWiki before 2009-12-25c allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify access control rules, and other unspecified requests, via unknown vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-xw78-vx8x-r728",
"modified": "2022-05-02T06:11:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T06:11:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0289"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.splitbrain.org/index.php?do=details\u0026task_id=1853"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://freshmeat.net/projects/dokuwiki/tags/security-fix"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-February/034729.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-February/034831.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/61708"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/38205"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201301-07.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-1976"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.splitbrain.org/blog/2010-01/17-dokuwiki-security"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-XW8J-5J7R-R5FP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-16 21:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tim Ridgway Better Protected Pages allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Better Protected Pages: from n/a through 1.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-23875"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-16T21:15:28Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tim Ridgway Better Protected Pages allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Better Protected Pages: from n/a through 1.0.",
"id": "GHSA-xw8j-5j7r-r5fp",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:15Z",
"published": "2025-01-16T21:31:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23875"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/better-protected-pages/vulnerability/wordpress-better-protected-pages-plugin-1-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XW9F-HWXG-FQ6R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-06 21:15 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:46Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in The WordPress.Org community Health Check & Troubleshooting plugin <= 1.5.1 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-47161"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-25T10:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in The WordPress.Org community Health Check \u0026 Troubleshooting plugin \u003c=\u00a01.5.1 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-xw9f-hwxg-fq6r",
"modified": "2024-04-04T05:46:25Z",
"published": "2023-07-06T21:15:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-47161"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/health-check/wordpress-health-check-troubleshooting-plugin-1-5-1-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XWC4-P3CG-MMQ4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-17 06:30 – Updated: 2024-09-17 18:33The Vikinghammer Tweet WordPress plugin through 0.2.4 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-8043"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-17T06:15:02Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Vikinghammer Tweet WordPress plugin through 0.2.4 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack.",
"id": "GHSA-xwc4-p3cg-mmq4",
"modified": "2024-09-17T18:33:25Z",
"published": "2024-09-17T06:30:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-8043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/2ba27715-add4-4e2c-ad0d-83ebdc26aec1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XWC7-PV4H-828F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-08 00:00 – Updated: 2022-03-17 00:02The WordPress Real Cookie Banner: GDPR (DSGVO) & ePrivacy Cookie Consent WordPress plugin before 2.14.2 does not have CSRF checks in place when resetting its settings, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin reset them via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-0445"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-07T09:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WordPress Real Cookie Banner: GDPR (DSGVO) \u0026 ePrivacy Cookie Consent WordPress plugin before 2.14.2 does not have CSRF checks in place when resetting its settings, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin reset them via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-xwc7-pv4h-828f",
"modified": "2022-03-17T00:02:55Z",
"published": "2022-03-08T00:00:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0445"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/d9f28255-0026-4c42-9e67-d17b618c2285"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XWF2-53MC-R8HX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:09 – Updated: 2023-07-24 19:28phpMyAdmin 4.7.x and 4.8.x versions prior to 4.8.4 are affected by a series of CSRF flaws. By deceiving a user into clicking on a crafted URL, it is possible to perform harmful SQL operations such as renaming databases, creating new tables/routines, deleting designer pages, adding/deleting users, updating user passwords, killing SQL processes, etc.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.8"
},
{
"fixed": "4.8.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.7"
},
{
"last_affected": "4.7.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-19969"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-24T19:28:59Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2018-12-11T17:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "phpMyAdmin 4.7.x and 4.8.x versions prior to 4.8.4 are affected by a series of CSRF flaws. By deceiving a user into clicking on a crafted URL, it is possible to perform harmful SQL operations such as renaming databases, creating new tables/routines, deleting designer pages, adding/deleting users, updating user passwords, killing SQL processes, etc.",
"id": "GHSA-xwf2-53mc-r8hx",
"modified": "2023-07-24T19:28:59Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:09:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-19969"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201904-16"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20210124223800/https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106175"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.phpmyadmin.net/security/PMASA-2018-7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "phpMyAdmin CSRF Vulnerability"
}
GHSA-XWF3-49MF-8PQ7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-31 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marco Milesi Browser Theme Color.This issue affects Browser Theme Color: from n/a through 1.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-22291"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-31T13:15:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marco Milesi Browser Theme Color.This issue affects Browser Theme Color: from n/a through 1.3.",
"id": "GHSA-xwf3-49mf-8pq7",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:33:52Z",
"published": "2024-01-31T15:30:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22291"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/browser-theme-color/wordpress-browser-theme-color-plugin-1-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XWF4-C7MF-4RH5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-13 15:31 – Updated: 2024-08-03 00:30DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/archives_do.php
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-28429"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-13T13:15:47Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/archives_do.php",
"id": "GHSA-xwf4-c7mf-4rh5",
"modified": "2024-08-03T00:30:57Z",
"published": "2024-03-13T15:31:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-28429"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/itsqian797/cms/blob/main/2.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.