Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-352

Allowed

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

14165 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-WP73-M8WC-M2MM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:36 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:36
VLAI
Details

A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in Sierra Wireless AirLink Raven XE, all versions prior to 4.0.14, and AirLink Raven XT, all versions prior to 4.0.11. Affected devices do not verify if a request was intentionally sent by the logged-in user, which may allow an attacker to trick a client into making an unintentional request to the web server that will be treated as an authentic request.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-6042"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-06-30T03:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in Sierra Wireless AirLink Raven XE, all versions prior to 4.0.14, and AirLink Raven XT, all versions prior to 4.0.11. Affected devices do not verify if a request was intentionally sent by the logged-in user, which may allow an attacker to trick a client into making an unintentional request to the web server that will be treated as an authentic request.",
  "id": "GHSA-wp73-m8wc-m2mm",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:36:34Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:36:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-6042"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-17-115-02"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98036"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WP7G-R4MW-J38Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:47 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:47
VLAI
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Ubercart Bulk Stock Updater module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors related to formAPI.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-2057"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-09-17T20:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Ubercart Bulk Stock Updater module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors related to formAPI.",
  "id": "GHSA-wp7g-r4mw-j38q",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:47:11Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:47:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2057"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74054"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/1482126"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/07/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52502"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-WP8G-3FHQ-9G29

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-17 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ajayver RSS Manager allows Stored XSS. This issue affects RSS Manager: from n/a through 0.06.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-39418"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-17T16:15:51Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ajayver RSS Manager allows Stored XSS. This issue affects RSS Manager: from n/a through 0.06.",
  "id": "GHSA-wp8g-3fhq-9g29",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:51Z",
  "published": "2025-04-17T18:31:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39418"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/rss-manager/vulnerability/wordpress-rss-manager-plugin-0-06-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WP8G-6V2P-4VFV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:57 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:57
VLAI
Details

SeaCMS v6.61 allows Remote Code execution by placing PHP code in an allowed IP address (aka ip) to /admin/admin_ip.php (aka /adm1n/admin_ip.php). The code is executed by visiting adm1n/admin_ip.php or data/admin/ip.php. This can also be exploited through CSRF.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-14910"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-08-03T19:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "SeaCMS v6.61 allows Remote Code execution by placing PHP code in an allowed IP address (aka ip) to /admin/admin_ip.php (aka /adm1n/admin_ip.php). The code is executed by visiting adm1n/admin_ip.php or data/admin/ip.php. This can also be exploited through CSRF.",
  "id": "GHSA-wp8g-6v2p-4vfv",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:57:54Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:57:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-14910"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MichaelWayneLIU/seacms/blob/master/seacms2.md"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WP8P-FCQC-823W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-02 00:00 – Updated: 2022-08-07 00:00
VLAI
Details

The Counter Box WordPress plugin before 1.2.1 is lacking CSRF check when activating and deactivating counters, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such actions via CSRF attacks

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-2245"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-08-01T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Counter Box WordPress plugin before 1.2.1 is lacking CSRF check when activating and deactivating counters, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such actions via CSRF attacks",
  "id": "GHSA-wp8p-fcqc-823w",
  "modified": "2022-08-07T00:00:30Z",
  "published": "2022-08-02T00:00:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2245"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/33705003-1f82-4b0c-9b4b-d4de75da309c"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WP8Q-4497-MJ3J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:37 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:37
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in Cisco SPA300 and SPA500 Series IP Phones could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a lack of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking the user of a web application into executing an adverse action. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuz88421, CSCuz91356, CSCve56308.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-12271"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-10-19T08:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in Cisco SPA300 and SPA500 Series IP Phones could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a lack of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking the user of a web application into executing an adverse action. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuz88421, CSCuz91356, CSCve56308.",
  "id": "GHSA-wp8q-4497-mj3j",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:37:59Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:37:59Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-12271"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20171018-spa"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101524"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039621"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WP95-G3H2-JHQF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-27 09:31 – Updated: 2024-10-28 03:30
VLAI
Details

The Fatal Error Notify WordPress plugin before 1.5.3 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks in its test_error AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber to call it and spam the admin email address with error messages. The issue is also exploitable via CSRF

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-7202"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-02-27T09:15:37Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Fatal Error Notify WordPress plugin before 1.5.3 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks in its test_error AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber to call it and spam the admin email address with error messages. The issue is also exploitable via CSRF",
  "id": "GHSA-wp95-g3h2-jhqf",
  "modified": "2024-10-28T03:30:39Z",
  "published": "2024-02-27T09:31:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-7202"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://research.cleantalk.org/cve-2023-7202-fatal-error-notify-error-email-sending-csrf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/d923ba5b-1c20-40ee-ac69-cd0bb65b375a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WPFC-R5QQ-7R7P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-11-29 15:30 – Updated: 2024-08-02 10:37
VLAI
Summary
Jenkins NeuVector Vulnerability Scanner Plugin Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability
Details

Jenkins NeuVector Vulnerability Scanner Plugin 1.22 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a connection test HTTP endpoint. This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified hostname and port using attacker-specified username and password. Additionally, this HTTP endpoint does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.

NeuVector Vulnerability Scanner Plugin 2.2 requires POST requests and Overall/Administer permission for the affected HTTP endpoint.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.jenkins.plugins:neuvector-vulnerability-scanner"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-49673"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-11-29T21:31:59Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-11-29T14:15:07Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Jenkins NeuVector Vulnerability Scanner Plugin 1.22 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a connection test HTTP endpoint. This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified hostname and port using attacker-specified username and password. Additionally, this HTTP endpoint does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.\n\nNeuVector Vulnerability Scanner Plugin 2.2 requires POST requests and Overall/Administer permission for the affected HTTP endpoint.",
  "id": "GHSA-wpfc-r5qq-7r7p",
  "modified": "2024-08-02T10:37:27Z",
  "published": "2023-11-29T15:30:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-49673"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/neuvector-vulnerability-scanner-plugin"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2023-11-29/#SECURITY-3256"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/11/29/1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Jenkins NeuVector Vulnerability Scanner Plugin Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability"
}

GHSA-WPGM-86GJ-6WRW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:45 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:45
VLAI
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Comment Moderation module 6.x-1.x before 6.x-1.1 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that publish comments.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-2716"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-06-21T15:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Comment Moderation module 6.x-1.x before 6.x-1.1 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that publish comments.",
  "id": "GHSA-wpgm-86gj-6wrw",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:45:22Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:45:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2716"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/75998"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/1538768"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/1608822"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupalcode.org/project/comment_moderation.git/commitdiff/f18c3de"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/82434"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/49326"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53738"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-WPH5-WG5J-GGGC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-14 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Prince Integrate Google Drive allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Integrate Google Drive: from n/a through 1.5.2.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-54703"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-14T11:15:52Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Prince Integrate Google Drive allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Integrate Google Drive: from n/a through 1.5.2.",
  "id": "GHSA-wph5-wg5j-gggc",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:51Z",
  "published": "2025-08-14T12:30:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-54703"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/integrate-google-drive/vulnerability/wordpress-integrate-google-drive-plugin-plugin-1-5-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
  • Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Implementation

Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
  • When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
  • Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
  • This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.

Mitigation
Implementation

Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)

An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.

CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing

An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.

CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification

An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).

CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery

An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.