CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14178 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-VPC4-Q7GX-PPMW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-20 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP-buy WP Content Copy Protection & No Right Click allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Content Copy Protection & No Right Click: from n/a through 3.5.9.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-49306"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-20T11:15:03Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP-buy WP Content Copy Protection \u0026 No Right Click allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Content Copy Protection \u0026 No Right Click: from n/a through 3.5.9.",
"id": "GHSA-vpc4-q7gx-ppmw",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:09Z",
"published": "2024-10-20T12:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49306"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/wp-content-copy-protector/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-content-copy-protection-no-right-click-plugin-3-5-9-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/wp-content-copy-protector/wordpress-wp-content-copy-protection-no-right-click-plugin-3-5-9-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VPCF-7W94-C5F2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:03 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:03Projectworlds Online Examination System 1.0 is vulnerable to CSRF, which allows a remote attacker to delete the existing user.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-25411"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-05-24T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Projectworlds Online Examination System 1.0 is vulnerable to CSRF, which allows a remote attacker to delete the existing user.",
"id": "GHSA-vpcf-7w94-c5f2",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:03:08Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:03:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-25411"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/projectworldsofficial/online-examination-systen-in-php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nikhilkumar01.medium.com/cve-2020-25411-a245bdf88fb5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-VPCF-PRRV-RXM4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:58 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:58An issue was discovered in Moxa NPort 5110 versions prior to 2.6, NPort 5130/5150 Series versions prior to 3.6, NPort 5200 Series versions prior to 2.8, NPort 5400 Series versions prior to 3.11, NPort 5600 Series versions prior to 3.7, NPort 5100A Series & NPort P5150A versions prior to 1.3, NPort 5200A Series versions prior to 1.3, NPort 5150AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5250AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5450AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5600-8-DT Series versions prior to 2.4, NPort 5600-8-DTL Series versions prior to 2.4, NPort 6x50 Series versions prior to 1.13.11, NPort IA5450A versions prior to v1.4. Requests are not verified to be intentionally submitted by the proper user (CROSS-SITE REQUEST FORGERY).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-9365"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-02-13T21:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Moxa NPort 5110 versions prior to 2.6, NPort 5130/5150 Series versions prior to 3.6, NPort 5200 Series versions prior to 2.8, NPort 5400 Series versions prior to 3.11, NPort 5600 Series versions prior to 3.7, NPort 5100A Series \u0026 NPort P5150A versions prior to 1.3, NPort 5200A Series versions prior to 1.3, NPort 5150AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5250AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5450AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5600-8-DT Series versions prior to 2.4, NPort 5600-8-DTL Series versions prior to 2.4, NPort 6x50 Series versions prior to 1.13.11, NPort IA5450A versions prior to v1.4. Requests are not verified to be intentionally submitted by the proper user (CROSS-SITE REQUEST FORGERY).",
"id": "GHSA-vpcf-prrv-rxm4",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:58:45Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:58:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9365"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-16-336-02"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/85965"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VPFX-RGWP-628J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-06 21:14 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:44Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in User Meta Manager plugin <= 3.4.9 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-23712"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-22T09:15:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in User Meta Manager plugin \u003c=\u00a03.4.9 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-vpfx-rgwp-628j",
"modified": "2024-04-04T05:44:56Z",
"published": "2023-07-06T21:14:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-23712"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/user-meta-manager/wordpress-user-meta-manager-plugin-3-4-9-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VPG6-7CCH-GQ2J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-20 12:32 – Updated: 2025-03-20 12:32A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in multiple file upload endpoints of parisneo/lollms-webui version V12 (Strawberry). The vulnerability can be exploited remotely via Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). Despite CSRF protection preventing file uploads, the application still processes multipart boundaries, leading to resource exhaustion. By appending additional characters to the multipart boundary, an attacker can cause the server to parse each byte of the boundary, ultimately leading to service unavailability. This vulnerability is present in the /upload_avatar, /upload_app, and /upload_logo endpoints.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-8736"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-20T10:15:43Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in multiple file upload endpoints of parisneo/lollms-webui version V12 (Strawberry). The vulnerability can be exploited remotely via Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). Despite CSRF protection preventing file uploads, the application still processes multipart boundaries, leading to resource exhaustion. By appending additional characters to the multipart boundary, an attacker can cause the server to parse each byte of the boundary, ultimately leading to service unavailability. This vulnerability is present in the `/upload_avatar`, `/upload_app`, and `/upload_logo` endpoints.",
"id": "GHSA-vpg6-7cch-gq2j",
"modified": "2025-03-20T12:32:48Z",
"published": "2025-03-20T12:32:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-8736"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/935dbc03-1b43-4dbb-b6cd-1aa95a789d4f"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VPGX-838J-HQQ6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:42 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:42Racom's MIDGE Firmware 4.4.40.105 contains an issue that allows for cross-site request forgeries.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-20073"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-02-16T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Racom\u0027s MIDGE Firmware 4.4.40.105 contains an issue that allows for cross-site request forgeries.",
"id": "GHSA-vpgx-838j-hqq6",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:42:21Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:42:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20073"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2021-04"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-VPJC-3V2R-P99W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-02-03 03:30 – Updated: 2025-03-26 18:30A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Academy LMS before v5.10 allows an attacker to arbitrarily create a page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-47131"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-02-03T01:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Academy LMS before v5.10 allows an attacker to arbitrarily create a page.",
"id": "GHSA-vpjc-3v2r-p99w",
"modified": "2025-03-26T18:30:35Z",
"published": "2023-02-03T03:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-47131"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.hackingforce.com.br/en/xss"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/OpenXP-Research/CVE-2022-47131"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portswigger.net/web-security/csrf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portswigger.net/web-security/csrf/xss-vs-csrf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/xvinicius"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://xpsec.co/blog/academy-lms-5-10-add-page-csrf-xss"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VPMC-J5G3-84G8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-17 00:01 – Updated: 2022-06-29 00:00A vulnerability was found in XYZScripts Contact Form Manager Plugin. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-20053"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-06-16T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in XYZScripts Contact Form Manager Plugin. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
"id": "GHSA-vpmc-j5g3-84g8",
"modified": "2022-06-29T00:00:56Z",
"published": "2022-06-17T00:01:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-20053"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sumofpwn.nl/advisory/2016/cross_site_request_forgery___cross_site_scripting_in_contact_form_manager_wordpress_plugin.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.97387"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Feb/99"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VPPW-RWG5-66QV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-13 15:31 – Updated: 2024-08-03 00:30DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/article_add.php
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-28665"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-13T13:15:48Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/article_add.php",
"id": "GHSA-vppw-rwg5-66qv",
"modified": "2024-08-03T00:30:57Z",
"published": "2024-03-13T15:31:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-28665"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/777erp/cms/blob/main/1.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VPQ3-X847-JM56
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-16 21:30 – Updated: 2025-12-17 15:34nopCommerce 4.90.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Schedule Tasks functionality.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-65593"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-16T19:15:59Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "nopCommerce 4.90.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Schedule Tasks functionality.",
"id": "GHSA-vpq3-x847-jm56",
"modified": "2025-12-17T15:34:53Z",
"published": "2025-12-16T21:30:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-65593"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Dec/20"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.nopcommerce.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Dec/20"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.