CWE-299
AllowedImproper Check for Certificate Revocation
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not check or incorrectly checks the revocation status of a certificate, which may cause it to use a certificate that has been compromised.
29 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2025-3085 (GCVE-0-2025-3085)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-01 12:05 – Updated: 2025-04-01 13:03- CWE-299 - Improper Check for Certificate Revocation
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MongoDB Inc | MongoDB Server |
Affected:
5.0 , < 5.0.31
(custom)
Affected: 6.0 , < 6.0.20 (custom) Affected: 7.0 , < 7.0.16 (custom) Affected: 8.0. , < 8.0.4 (custom) cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.17:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.18:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.19:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.20:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.21:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.22:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.23:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.24:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.25:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.26:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.27:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.28:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.29:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.30:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.17:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.18:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.19:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:8.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:8.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:8.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:8.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-3085",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-01T13:02:43.439177Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-01T13:03:02.701Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.17:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.18:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.19:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.20:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.21:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.22:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.23:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.24:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.25:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.26:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.27:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.28:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.29:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:5.0.30:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.17:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.18:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:6.0.19:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:7.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:8.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:8.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:8.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb:8.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MongoDB Server",
"vendor": "MongoDB Inc",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.31",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.0.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.0.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.0.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0.",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "MongoDB Server must be running on Linux Operating Systems and CRL revocation status checking must be enabled"
}
],
"value": "MongoDB Server must be running on Linux Operating Systems and CRL revocation status checking must be enabled"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-04-01T09:16:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eA MongoDB server under specific conditions running on Linux with TLS and CRL revocation status checking enabled, fails to check the revocation status of the intermediate certificates in the peer\u0027s certificate chain. In cases of MONGODB-X509, which is not enabled by default, this may lead to improper authentication. This issue may also affect intra-cluster authentication. This issue affects MongoDB Server v5.0 versions prior to 5.0.31, MongoDB Server v6.0 versions prior to 6.0.20, MongoDB Server v7.0 versions prior to 7.0.16 and MongoDB Server v8.0 versions prior to 8.0.4.\u003cbr\u003eRequired Configuration :\u0026nbsp;MongoDB Server must be running on Linux Operating Systems and CRL revocation status checking must be enabled\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A MongoDB server under specific conditions running on Linux with TLS and CRL revocation status checking enabled, fails to check the revocation status of the intermediate certificates in the peer\u0027s certificate chain. In cases of MONGODB-X509, which is not enabled by default, this may lead to improper authentication. This issue may also affect intra-cluster authentication. This issue affects MongoDB Server v5.0 versions prior to 5.0.31, MongoDB Server v6.0 versions prior to 6.0.20, MongoDB Server v7.0 versions prior to 7.0.16 and MongoDB Server v8.0 versions prior to 8.0.4.\nRequired Configuration :\u00a0MongoDB Server must be running on Linux Operating Systems and CRL revocation status checking must be enabled"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-299",
"description": "CWE-299: Improper Check for Certificate Revocation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-01T12:05:05.401Z",
"orgId": "a39b4221-9bd0-4244-95fc-f3e2e07f1deb",
"shortName": "mongodb"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-95445"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "MongoDB Server running on Linux may allow unexpected connections where intermediate certificates are revoked",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a39b4221-9bd0-4244-95fc-f3e2e07f1deb",
"assignerShortName": "mongodb",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-3085",
"datePublished": "2025-04-01T12:05:05.401Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-01T09:16:34.872Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-01T13:03:02.701Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-56138 (GCVE-0-2024-56138)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-13 21:37 – Updated: 2025-01-14 00:26- CWE-299 - Improper Check for Certificate Revocation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/notaryproject/notation-go/secu… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/notaryproject/notation-go/comm… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| notaryproject | notation-go |
Affected:
< 1.3.0-rc.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-56138",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-14T00:25:46.882500Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-14T00:26:00.838Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "notation-go",
"vendor": "notaryproject",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.3.0-rc.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "notion-go is a collection of libraries for supporting sign and verify OCI artifacts. Based on Notary Project specifications. This issue was identified during Quarkslab\u0027s audit of the timestamp feature. During the timestamp signature generation, the revocation status of the certificate(s) used to generate the timestamp signature was not verified. During timestamp signature generation, notation-go did not check the revocation status of the certificate chain used by the TSA. This oversight creates a vulnerability that could be exploited through a Man-in-The-Middle attack. An attacker could potentially use a compromised, intermediate, or revoked leaf certificate to generate a malicious countersignature, which would then be accepted and stored by `notation`. This could lead to denial of service scenarios, particularly in CI/CD environments during signature verification processes because timestamp signature would fail due to the presence of a revoked certificate(s) potentially disrupting operations. This issue has been addressed in release version 1.3.0-rc.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-299",
"description": "CWE-299: Improper Check for Certificate Revocation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-13T21:37:59.729Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/notaryproject/notation-go/security/advisories/GHSA-45v3-38pc-874v",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/notaryproject/notation-go/security/advisories/GHSA-45v3-38pc-874v"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/notaryproject/notation-go/commit/e7005a6d13e5ba472d4e166fbb085152f909e102",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/notaryproject/notation-go/commit/e7005a6d13e5ba472d4e166fbb085152f909e102"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-45v3-38pc-874v",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Timestamp signature generation lacks certificate revocation check in notion-go"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-56138",
"datePublished": "2025-01-13T21:37:59.729Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-16T17:30:30.068Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-14T00:26:00.838Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-23690 (GCVE-0-2023-23690)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-01-19 11:25 – Updated: 2025-04-02 14:58- CWE-299 - Improper Check for Certificate Revocation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/00020752… | vendor-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell | Cloud Mobility for Dell Storage |
Affected:
0 , < 1.3.3.X
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T10:35:33.747Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000207521/dsa-2023-019-dell-emc-cloud-mobility-security-update-for-certificate-revocation-vulnerability"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-23690",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-02T14:57:48.546482Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-02T14:58:04.777Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cloud Mobility for Dell Storage",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.3.3.X",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eCloud Mobility for Dell EMC Storage, versions 1.3.0.X and below contains an Improper Check for Certificate Revocation vulnerability. A threat actor does not need any specific privileges to potentially exploit this vulnerability. An attacker could perform a man-in-the-middle attack and eavesdrop on encrypted communications from Cloud Mobility to Cloud Storage devices. Exploitation could lead to the compromise of secret and sensitive information, cloud storage connection downtime, and the integrity of the connection to the Cloud devices.\u003c/span\u003e\n\n"
}
],
"value": "\nCloud Mobility for Dell EMC Storage, versions 1.3.0.X and below contains an Improper Check for Certificate Revocation vulnerability. A threat actor does not need any specific privileges to potentially exploit this vulnerability. An attacker could perform a man-in-the-middle attack and eavesdrop on encrypted communications from Cloud Mobility to Cloud Storage devices. Exploitation could lead to the compromise of secret and sensitive information, cloud storage connection downtime, and the integrity of the connection to the Cloud devices.\n\n"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-299",
"description": "CWE-299: Improper Check for Certificate Revocation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-01-19T11:26:26.002Z",
"orgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
"shortName": "dell"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000207521/dsa-2023-019-dell-emc-cloud-mobility-security-update-for-certificate-revocation-vulnerability"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
"assignerShortName": "dell",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-23690",
"datePublished": "2023-01-19T11:25:48.778Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-01-17T05:22:17.394Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-02T14:58:04.777Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2020-16228 (GCVE-0-2020-16228)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-09-11 12:58 – Updated: 2024-08-04 13:37- CWE-299 - Improper Check for Certificate Revocation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsma-20-254-01 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://www.philips.com/productsecurity |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Philips | Patient Information Center iX (PICiX) |
Affected:
C.02
Affected: C.03 |
|
| Philips | PerformanceBridge Focal Point |
Affected:
A.01
|
|
| Philips | IntelliVue patient monitors |
Affected:
MX100
Affected: MX400-MX550 Affected: MX750 Affected: MX850 |
|
| Philips | IntelliVue X3 |
Affected:
0 , ≤ N
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T13:37:54.179Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsma-20-254-01"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.philips.com/productsecurity"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Patient Information Center iX (PICiX)",
"vendor": "Philips",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "C.02"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "C.03"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PerformanceBridge Focal Point",
"vendor": "Philips",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "A.01"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "IntelliVue patient monitors",
"vendor": "Philips",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "MX100"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "MX400-MX550"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "MX750"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "MX850"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "IntelliVue X3",
"vendor": "Philips",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "N",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Julian Suleder, Nils Emmerich, Birk Kauer of ERNW Research GmbH, Dr. Oliver Matula of ERNW Enno, and Rey Netzwerke GmbH reported these vulnerabilities to the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Germany, in the context of the BSI project ManiMed (Manipulation of medical devices), which reported these to Philips."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\nIn Patient Information Center iX (PICiX) Versions C.02 and C.03, \nPerformanceBridge Focal Point Version A.01, IntelliVue patient monitors \nMX100, MX400-MX550, MX750, MX850, and IntelliVue X3 Versions N and \nprior, the software does not check or incorrectly checks the revocation \nstatus of a certificate, which may cause it to use a compromised \ncertificate.\n\n\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In Patient Information Center iX (PICiX) Versions C.02 and C.03, \nPerformanceBridge Focal Point Version A.01, IntelliVue patient monitors \nMX100, MX400-MX550, MX750, MX850, and IntelliVue X3 Versions N and \nprior, the software does not check or incorrectly checks the revocation \nstatus of a certificate, which may cause it to use a compromised \ncertificate."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-299",
"description": "CWE-299 Improper Check for Certificate Revocation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-12-12T20:52:52.755Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsma-20-254-01"
},
{
"url": "https://www.philips.com/productsecurity"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003ePhilips released the following versions to remediate reported vulnerabilities:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePatient Information Center iX (PICiX) Version C.03\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePerformanceBridge Focal Point\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIntelliVue Patient Monitors Versions N.00 and N.01\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIntelliVue Patient Monitors Version M.04: Contact a \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.usa.philips.com/healthcare/solutions/customer-service-solutions\"\u003ePhilips service support team\u003c/a\u003e for an upgrade path\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCertificate revocation within the system was implemented for PIC iX \nand Performance Bridge FocalPoint in 2023. The implementation of the \nIntelliVue Patient Monitors will be completed in Q3 of 2024.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Philips released the following versions to remediate reported vulnerabilities:\n\n\n\n * Patient Information Center iX (PICiX) Version C.03\n\n * PerformanceBridge Focal Point\n\n * IntelliVue Patient Monitors Versions N.00 and N.01\n\n * IntelliVue Patient Monitors Version M.04: Contact a Philips service support team https://www.usa.philips.com/healthcare/solutions/customer-service-solutions for an upgrade path\n\n * Certificate revocation within the system was implemented for PIC iX \nand Performance Bridge FocalPoint in 2023. The implementation of the \nIntelliVue Patient Monitors will be completed in Q3 of 2024."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Philips Patient Monitoring Devices Improper Check for Certificate Revocation",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAs a mitigation to these vulnerabilities, Philips recommends the following:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Philips patient monitoring network is required to be physically \nor logically isolated from the hospital local area network (LAN). \nPhilips recommends using a firewall or routers that can implement access\n control lists restricting access in and out of the patient monitoring \nnetwork for only necessary ports and IP addresses. Refer to the Philips \nPatient Monitoring System Security for Clinical Networks guide for \nadditional information on \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://incenter.medical.philips.com/\"\u003eInCenter\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBy default, the simple certificate enrollment protocol (SCEP) \nservice is not running. When needed, the service is configured to run \nbased on the duration or the number of certificates to be assigned. One \ncertificate is default, but if a certificate is not issued, the service \nwill continue to run. Limit exposure by ensuring the SCEP service is not\n running unless it is actively being used to enroll new devices.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen enrolling new devices using SCEP, enter a unique challenge password of 8-12 unpredictable and randomized digits.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eImplement physical security controls to prevent unauthorized login \nattempts on the PIC iX application. Servers should be kept in controlled\n locked data centers. Access to equipment at nurses\u2019 stations should be \ncontrolled and monitored.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOnly grant remote access to PIC iX servers on a must-have basis.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGrant login privileges to the bedside monitor and PIC iX application\n on a role-based, least-privilege basis, and only to trusted users.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUsers with questions regarding their specific Philips Patient \nInformation Center (PIC iX) and/or IntelliVue patient monitor \ninstallations and new release eligibility should contact their local \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.usa.philips.com/healthcare/solutions/customer-service-solutions\"\u003ePhilips service support team, or regional service support\u003c/a\u003e, or call 1-800-722-9377.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePlease see the \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.philips.com/productsecurity\"\u003ePhilips product security website\u003c/a\u003e for the Philips advisory and the latest security information for Philips products.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "As a mitigation to these vulnerabilities, Philips recommends the following:\n\n\n\n * The Philips patient monitoring network is required to be physically \nor logically isolated from the hospital local area network (LAN). \nPhilips recommends using a firewall or routers that can implement access\n control lists restricting access in and out of the patient monitoring \nnetwork for only necessary ports and IP addresses. Refer to the Philips \nPatient Monitoring System Security for Clinical Networks guide for \nadditional information on InCenter https://incenter.medical.philips.com/ .\n\n * By default, the simple certificate enrollment protocol (SCEP) \nservice is not running. When needed, the service is configured to run \nbased on the duration or the number of certificates to be assigned. One \ncertificate is default, but if a certificate is not issued, the service \nwill continue to run. Limit exposure by ensuring the SCEP service is not\n running unless it is actively being used to enroll new devices.\n\n * When enrolling new devices using SCEP, enter a unique challenge password of 8-12 unpredictable and randomized digits.\n\n * Implement physical security controls to prevent unauthorized login \nattempts on the PIC iX application. Servers should be kept in controlled\n locked data centers. Access to equipment at nurses\u2019 stations should be \ncontrolled and monitored.\n\n * Only grant remote access to PIC iX servers on a must-have basis.\n\n * Grant login privileges to the bedside monitor and PIC iX application\n on a role-based, least-privilege basis, and only to trusted users.\n\n\n\n\nUsers with questions regarding their specific Philips Patient \nInformation Center (PIC iX) and/or IntelliVue patient monitor \ninstallations and new release eligibility should contact their local Philips service support team, or regional service support https://www.usa.philips.com/healthcare/solutions/customer-service-solutions , or call 1-800-722-9377.\n\n\nPlease see the Philips product security website https://www.philips.com/productsecurity for the Philips advisory and the latest security information for Philips products."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
"ID": "CVE-2020-16228",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Philips Patient Information Center iX (PICiX), PerformanceBridge Focal Point, IntelliVue patient monitors MX100, MX400-MX850, and MP2-MP90, IntelliVue X3 and X2.",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "Patient Information Center iX (PICiX) Versions B.02, C.02, C.03, PerformanceBridge Focal Point Version A.01, IntelliVue patient monitors MX100, MX400-MX850, and MP2-MP90 Versions N and prior, IntelliVue X3 and X2 Versions N and prior."
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Patient Information Center iX (PICiX) Versions B.02, C.02, C.03, PerformanceBridge Focal Point Version A.01, IntelliVue patient monitors MX100, MX400-MX850, and MP2-MP90 Versions N and prior, IntelliVue X3 and X2 Versions N and prior. The software does not check or incorrectly checks the revocation status of a certificate, which may cause it to use a compromised certificate."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "IMPROPER CHECK FOR CERTIFICATE REVOCATION CWE-299"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsma-20-254-01",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsma-20-254-01"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2020-16228",
"datePublished": "2020-09-11T12:58:13.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2020-07-31T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T13:37:54.179Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2020-1675 (GCVE-0-2020-1675)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-10-16 20:31 – Updated: 2024-09-16 22:01- CWE-299 - Improper Check for Certificate Revocation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://kb.juniper.net/JSA11072 | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juniper Networks | MIST Cloud UI |
Affected:
unspecified , < 09/02/2020
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T06:46:30.238Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://kb.juniper.net/JSA11072"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "MIST Cloud UI",
"vendor": "Juniper Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "09/02/2020",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2020-10-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "When Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) authentication is enabled, Juniper Networks Mist Cloud UI might incorrectly process invalid authentication certificates which could allow a malicious network-based user to access unauthorized data. This issue affects all Juniper Networks Mist Cloud UI versions prior to September 2 2020."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 8.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-299",
"description": "CWE-299 Improper Check for Certificate Revocation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2020-10-16T20:31:32.000Z",
"orgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"shortName": "juniper"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://kb.juniper.net/JSA11072"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mist Cloud UI has been updated on September 2 2020 to resolve this specific issue."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "JSA11072",
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Juniper Networks Mist Cloud UI: SAML authentication certificate vulnerability.",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "No workarounds are required since the issue has been resolved in the Mist cloud UI."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "sirt@juniper.net",
"DATE_PUBLIC": "2020-10-14T16:00:00.000Z",
"ID": "CVE-2020-1675",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Juniper Networks Mist Cloud UI: SAML authentication certificate vulnerability."
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "MIST Cloud UI",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_value": "09/02/2020"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Juniper Networks"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "When Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) authentication is enabled, Juniper Networks Mist Cloud UI might incorrectly process invalid authentication certificates which could allow a malicious network-based user to access unauthorized data. This issue affects all Juniper Networks Mist Cloud UI versions prior to September 2 2020."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 8.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-299 Improper Check for Certificate Revocation"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://kb.juniper.net/JSA11072",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://kb.juniper.net/JSA11072"
}
]
},
"solution": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mist Cloud UI has been updated on September 2 2020 to resolve this specific issue."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "JSA11072",
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"work_around": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "No workarounds are required since the issue has been resolved in the Mist cloud UI."
}
]
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"assignerShortName": "juniper",
"cveId": "CVE-2020-1675",
"datePublished": "2020-10-16T20:31:32.283Z",
"dateReserved": "2019-11-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T22:01:32.790Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
GHSA-45V3-38PC-874V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-13 16:14 – Updated: 2025-01-14 21:05This issue was identified during Quarkslab's audit of the timestamp feature.
Summary
During the timestamp signature generation, the revocation status of the certificate(s) used to generate the timestamp signature was not verified.
Details
During timestamp signature generation, notation-go did not check the revocation status of the certificate chain used by the TSA. This oversight creates a vulnerability that could be exploited through a Man-in-The-Middle attack. An attacker could potentially use a compromised, intermediate, or revoked leaf certificate to generate a malicious countersignature, which would then be accepted and stored by notation.
Impact
This could lead to denial of service scenarios, particularly in CI/CD environments during signature verification processes because timestamp signature would fail due to the presence of a revoked certificate(s) potentially disrupting operations.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.3.0-rc.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/notaryproject/notation-go"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.2.0-beta.1"
},
{
"fixed": "1.3.0-rc.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-56138"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-299"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-01-13T16:14:07Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-13T22:15:14Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "This issue was identified during Quarkslab\u0027s audit of the timestamp feature.\n\n### Summary\nDuring the timestamp signature generation, the revocation status of the certificate(s) used to generate the timestamp signature was not verified.\n\n### Details\nDuring timestamp signature generation, notation-go did not check the revocation status of the certificate chain used by the TSA. This oversight creates a vulnerability that could be exploited through a Man-in-The-Middle attack. An attacker could potentially use a compromised, intermediate, or revoked leaf certificate to generate a malicious countersignature, which would then be accepted and stored by `notation`.\n\n### Impact\nThis could lead to denial of service scenarios, particularly in CI/CD environments during signature verification processes because timestamp signature would fail due to the presence of a revoked certificate(s) potentially disrupting operations.\n",
"id": "GHSA-45v3-38pc-874v",
"modified": "2025-01-14T21:05:54Z",
"published": "2025-01-13T16:14:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/notaryproject/notation-go/security/advisories/GHSA-45v3-38pc-874v"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56138"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/notaryproject/notation-go/commit/e7005a6d13e5ba472d4e166fbb085152f909e102"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/notaryproject/notation-go/commit/e99be1954a15673020150c5f8800b8174cd7428d"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/notaryproject/notation-go"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3381"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "notation-go\u0027s timestamp signature generation lacks certificate revocation check"
}
GHSA-5J2H-PWP3-258R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-21 21:31 – Updated: 2025-07-21 21:31IBM Cognos Analytics Mobile (iOS) 1.1.0 through 1.1.22
is vulnerable to authentication bypass by using the Local Authentication Framework library which is not needed as biometric authentication is not used in the application.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-36057"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-299"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-21T19:15:28Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "IBM Cognos Analytics Mobile (iOS) 1.1.0 through 1.1.22 \n\nis vulnerable to authentication bypass by using the Local Authentication Framework library which is not needed as biometric authentication is not used in the application.",
"id": "GHSA-5j2h-pwp3-258r",
"modified": "2025-07-21T21:31:37Z",
"published": "2025-07-21T21:31:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-36057"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7239635"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8CW5-PXRW-VQHC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-27 12:32 – Updated: 2025-10-27 12:32Incorrect validation of OCSP certificates vulnerability in TheGreenBow VPN, versions 7.5 and 7.6. During the IKEv2 authentication step, the OCSP-enabled VPN client establishes the tunnel even if it does not receive an OCSP response or if the OCSP response signature is invalid.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-11955"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-299"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-27T12:15:32Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Incorrect validation of OCSP certificates vulnerability in TheGreenBow VPN, versions 7.5 and 7.6. During the IKEv2 authentication step, the OCSP-enabled VPN client establishes the tunnel even if it does not receive an OCSP response or if the OCSP response signature is invalid.",
"id": "GHSA-8cw5-pxrw-vqhc",
"modified": "2025-10-27T12:32:52Z",
"published": "2025-10-27T12:32:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-11955"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/incorrect-validation-ocsp-certificates-thegreenbow-vpn-client-windows"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.thegreenbow.com/en/support/security-alerts"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-8F6J-263M-G72X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-13 23:49 – Updated: 2026-07-13 23:49Summary
SignedDataVerifier attempts to perform online revocation checking when enable_online_checks=True, but its OCSP validation logic accepts stale GOOD responses as valid indefinitely. In appstoreserverlibrary/signed_data_verifier.py, _ChainVerifier.check_ocsp_status() verifies the OCSP response signature and CertID match, but never validates the freshness window carried by producedAt, thisUpdate, or nextUpdate.
As a result, a previously valid signed OCSP GOOD response can be replayed after it is expired, and the library will still treat the certificate as good. If an App Store signing certificate or intermediate is ever revoked, applications using this library with online checks enabled can continue accepting JWS objects signed with the revoked key as long as a stale signed OCSP response is replayed.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.1.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "app-store-server-library"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.1.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295",
"CWE-299"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-13T23:49:14Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n`SignedDataVerifier` attempts to perform online revocation checking when `enable_online_checks=True`, but its OCSP validation logic accepts stale `GOOD` responses as valid indefinitely. In `appstoreserverlibrary/signed_data_verifier.py`, `_ChainVerifier.check_ocsp_status()` verifies the OCSP response signature and CertID match, but never validates the freshness window carried by `producedAt`, `thisUpdate`, or `nextUpdate`.\n\nAs a result, a previously valid signed OCSP `GOOD` response can be replayed after it is expired, and the library will still treat the certificate as good. If an App Store signing certificate or intermediate is ever revoked, applications using this library with online checks enabled can continue accepting JWS objects signed with the revoked key as long as a stale signed OCSP response is replayed.",
"id": "GHSA-8f6j-263m-g72x",
"modified": "2026-07-13T23:49:14Z",
"published": "2026-07-13T23:49:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apple/app-store-server-library-python/security/advisories/GHSA-8f6j-263m-g72x"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apple/app-store-server-library-python"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Apple App Store Server Python Library: SignedDataVerifier accepts stale OCSP GOOD responses and can bypass certificate revocation checks"
}
GHSA-8HRM-P5H4-6VCX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-18 15:32 – Updated: 2026-09-18 15:32rustls-webpki versions before 0.103.10 and 0.104.0-alpha.5 contain faulty CRL authority-matching logic that compares only the first distributionPoint against each CRL's IssuingDistributionPoint, ignoring additional distributionPoints. Attackers with a compromised trusted issuing authority can present revoked certificates that pass revocation checks under UnknownStatusPolicy::Allow, or cause incorrect errors under the default deny policy.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-93602"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-299"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-18T14:19:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "rustls-webpki versions before 0.103.10 and 0.104.0-alpha.5 contain faulty CRL authority-matching logic that compares only the first distributionPoint against each CRL\u0027s IssuingDistributionPoint, ignoring additional distributionPoints. Attackers with a compromised trusted issuing authority can present revoked certificates that pass revocation checks under UnknownStatusPolicy::Allow, or cause incorrect errors under the default deny policy.",
"id": "GHSA-8hrm-p5h4-6vcx",
"modified": "2026-09-18T15:32:18Z",
"published": "2026-09-18T15:32:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-pwjx-qhcg-rvj4"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93602"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rustls-webpki-before-0.103.10-crl-revocation-check-bypass"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Mitigation
Ensure that certificates are checked for revoked status.
Mitigation
If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the revoked status.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.