CWE-290
AllowedAuthentication Bypass by Spoofing
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
This attack-focused weakness is caused by incorrectly implemented authentication schemes that are subject to spoofing attacks.
927 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-6G28-PPR3-C5V8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-29 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:31Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Yassine Idrissi Maintenance & Coming Soon Redirect Animation allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Maintenance & Coming Soon Redirect Animation: from n/a through 2.1.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-43944"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-08-29T16:15:09Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Yassine Idrissi Maintenance \u0026 Coming Soon Redirect Animation allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Maintenance \u0026 Coming Soon Redirect Animation: from n/a through 2.1.3.",
"id": "GHSA-6g28-ppr3-c5v8",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:31:53Z",
"published": "2024-08-29T18:31:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43944"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/maintenance-coming-soon-redirect-animation/vulnerability/wordpress-maintenance-coming-soon-redirect-animation-plugin-2-1-3-ip-bypass-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/maintenance-coming-soon-redirect-animation/wordpress-maintenance-coming-soon-redirect-animation-plugin-2-1-3-ip-bypass-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6G2F-W7G3-77VF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-02 21:13 – Updated: 2026-07-02 21:13Summary
The fix for CVE-2026-46339 (unauthenticated RCE via unprotected MCP plugin routes) introduced a local-only access gate in src/dashboardGuard.js that restricts spawn-capable routes (/api/mcp/*, /api/tunnel/*, /api/cli-tools/*) to loopback requests. The gate determines "local" by inspecting the Host and Origin HTTP headers rather than the TCP source address. When 9router is deployed behind a reverse proxy, tunnel (Cloudflare Tunnel, Tailscale — both natively supported), or is subject to DNS rebinding, these headers are attacker-controlled, allowing the local-only gate to be bypassed.
A second factor (CLI token or JWT cookie) is required by canAccessLocalOnlyRoute(), but the CLI token is a deterministic HMAC of the machine ID (getConsistentMachineId), which is stable and predictable on cloud VMs. If the attacker can obtain or guess the machine ID (e.g., via another information disclosure, or on shared-tenant infrastructure), the full chain to MCP child process stdin injection is reachable.
This is a variant / incomplete fix of CVE-2026-46339 — the same attack surface (remote → MCP child process stdin) remains reachable under specific but realistic deployment configurations.
Root Cause
isLocalRequest() at src/dashboardGuard.js:93-101:
function isLocalRequest(request) {
if (!isLoopbackHostname(request.headers.get("host"))) return false;
const origin = request.headers.get("origin");
if (origin) {
try {
if (!isLoopbackHostname(new URL(origin).hostname)) return false;
} catch { return false; }
}
return true;
}
This function trusts Host and Origin headers as proof of local origin. Both are attacker-controlled in any proxied deployment. The LOOPBACK_HOSTS set (localhost, 127.0.0.1, ::1) is checked against these headers, not against the actual connection source IP.
Attack Scenario
Scenario 1: Cloudflare Tunnel / Tailscale Funnel
9router natively supports Cloudflare Tunnel and Tailscale (see LOCAL_ONLY_PATHS entries for /api/tunnel/*). When exposed via tunnel:
- Attacker sends request to
https://<tunnel-domain>/api/mcp/<plugin>/sse - Sets
Host: localhost:3000andOrigin: http://localhost:3000 isLocalRequest()returnstruecanAccessLocalOnlyRoute()then requires CLI token or (local + JWT)- CLI token is
getConsistentMachineId("9r-cli-auth")— a deterministic HMAC of the machine's hardware/OS identifiers
Scenario 2: DNS Rebinding
- Attacker controls
evil.comDNS, initially resolving to attacker IP - Victim's browser navigates to
evil.com(or via iframe/redirect) - DNS rebinding switches
evil.com→127.0.0.1 - Subsequent fetch to
evil.com:3000/api/mcp/<plugin>/messagereaches 9router Hostheader isevil.com:3000— this is blocked by the current check (not in LOOPBACK_HOSTS)- However, if the attacker uses
localhost:3000as the request host via CORS or service worker tricks, and the browser sendsHost: localhost:3000, the gate opens
Exploitation (when CLI token is obtained)
Once past the gate, the attacker can:
GET /api/mcp/<plugin>/sse— establish SSE session, getsessionIdPOST /api/mcp/<plugin>/message— send arbitrary JSON-RPC to the child process stdin- The child process is one of:
npx,node,python,python3,uvx,bunx,bun - Depending on the MCP plugin implementation, this can achieve arbitrary code execution on the host
Steps to Reproduce
- Deploy 9router behind a reverse proxy or tunnel
- From a remote host, send:
GET /api/mcp/browser/sse HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:3000
Origin: http://localhost:3000
x-9r-cli-token: <machine-id-derived-token>
- Observe: SSE connection established,
endpointevent received with message URL - POST arbitrary JSON-RPC to the message endpoint
Impact
An attacker who can reach a proxied/tunneled 9router instance and obtain the deterministic CLI token can bypass the local-only restriction and interact with MCP child processes (node, python, npx, etc.) via stdin. This achieves the same impact as CVE-2026-46339: remote code execution on the host.
The severity is reduced from CVE-2026-46339's CVSS 10.0 because: - Requires proxied/tunneled deployment (not default localhost-only) - Requires obtaining the CLI token (deterministic but not trivially guessable without another primitive)
Remediation
-
Check actual source IP, not headers. Use
request.ip,request.socket.remoteAddress, or a trustedX-Forwarded-Forheader with known proxy configuration instead ofHost/Originfor the local-only gate. -
Make CLI token non-deterministic. Generate a random token on first run and persist it, rather than deriving from machine ID. Machine IDs are often predictable or discoverable on cloud infrastructure.
-
Bind MCP routes to loopback at the network layer. If MCP is local-only by design, the server should bind those routes to
127.0.0.1only, not rely on middleware header checks.
Credit: @snailsploit
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "9router"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.4.55"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-49353"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-02T21:13:19Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nThe fix for CVE-2026-46339 (unauthenticated RCE via unprotected MCP plugin routes) introduced a local-only access gate in `src/dashboardGuard.js` that restricts spawn-capable routes (`/api/mcp/*`, `/api/tunnel/*`, `/api/cli-tools/*`) to loopback requests. The gate determines \"local\" by inspecting the `Host` and `Origin` HTTP headers rather than the TCP source address. When 9router is deployed behind a reverse proxy, tunnel (Cloudflare Tunnel, Tailscale \u2014 both natively supported), or is subject to DNS rebinding, these headers are attacker-controlled, allowing the local-only gate to be bypassed.\n\nA second factor (CLI token or JWT cookie) is required by `canAccessLocalOnlyRoute()`, but the CLI token is a deterministic HMAC of the machine ID (`getConsistentMachineId`), which is stable and predictable on cloud VMs. If the attacker can obtain or guess the machine ID (e.g., via another information disclosure, or on shared-tenant infrastructure), the full chain to MCP child process stdin injection is reachable.\n\nThis is a variant / incomplete fix of CVE-2026-46339 \u2014 the same attack surface (remote \u2192 MCP child process stdin) remains reachable under specific but realistic deployment configurations.\n\n## Root Cause\n\n`isLocalRequest()` at `src/dashboardGuard.js:93-101`:\n\n```javascript\nfunction isLocalRequest(request) {\n if (!isLoopbackHostname(request.headers.get(\"host\"))) return false;\n const origin = request.headers.get(\"origin\");\n if (origin) {\n try {\n if (!isLoopbackHostname(new URL(origin).hostname)) return false;\n } catch { return false; }\n }\n return true;\n}\n```\n\nThis function trusts `Host` and `Origin` headers as proof of local origin. Both are attacker-controlled in any proxied deployment. The `LOOPBACK_HOSTS` set (`localhost`, `127.0.0.1`, `::1`) is checked against these headers, not against the actual connection source IP.\n\n## Attack Scenario\n\n### Scenario 1: Cloudflare Tunnel / Tailscale Funnel\n\n9router natively supports Cloudflare Tunnel and Tailscale (see `LOCAL_ONLY_PATHS` entries for `/api/tunnel/*`). When exposed via tunnel:\n\n1. Attacker sends request to `https://\u003ctunnel-domain\u003e/api/mcp/\u003cplugin\u003e/sse`\n2. Sets `Host: localhost:3000` and `Origin: http://localhost:3000`\n3. `isLocalRequest()` returns `true`\n4. `canAccessLocalOnlyRoute()` then requires CLI token or (local + JWT)\n5. CLI token is `getConsistentMachineId(\"9r-cli-auth\")` \u2014 a deterministic HMAC of the machine\u0027s hardware/OS identifiers\n\n### Scenario 2: DNS Rebinding\n\n1. Attacker controls `evil.com` DNS, initially resolving to attacker IP\n2. Victim\u0027s browser navigates to `evil.com` (or via iframe/redirect)\n3. DNS rebinding switches `evil.com` \u2192 `127.0.0.1`\n4. Subsequent fetch to `evil.com:3000/api/mcp/\u003cplugin\u003e/message` reaches 9router\n5. `Host` header is `evil.com:3000` \u2014 this is **blocked** by the current check (not in LOOPBACK_HOSTS)\n6. However, if the attacker uses `localhost:3000` as the request host via CORS or service worker tricks, and the browser sends `Host: localhost:3000`, the gate opens\n\n### Exploitation (when CLI token is obtained)\n\nOnce past the gate, the attacker can:\n\n1. `GET /api/mcp/\u003cplugin\u003e/sse` \u2014 establish SSE session, get `sessionId`\n2. `POST /api/mcp/\u003cplugin\u003e/message` \u2014 send arbitrary JSON-RPC to the child process stdin\n3. The child process is one of: `npx`, `node`, `python`, `python3`, `uvx`, `bunx`, `bun`\n4. Depending on the MCP plugin implementation, this can achieve arbitrary code execution on the host\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\n\n1. Deploy 9router behind a reverse proxy or tunnel\n2. From a remote host, send:\n\n```http\nGET /api/mcp/browser/sse HTTP/1.1\nHost: localhost:3000\nOrigin: http://localhost:3000\nx-9r-cli-token: \u003cmachine-id-derived-token\u003e\n```\n\n3. Observe: SSE connection established, `endpoint` event received with message URL\n4. POST arbitrary JSON-RPC to the message endpoint\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker who can reach a proxied/tunneled 9router instance and obtain the deterministic CLI token can bypass the local-only restriction and interact with MCP child processes (node, python, npx, etc.) via stdin. This achieves the same impact as CVE-2026-46339: remote code execution on the host.\n\nThe severity is reduced from CVE-2026-46339\u0027s CVSS 10.0 because:\n- Requires proxied/tunneled deployment (not default localhost-only)\n- Requires obtaining the CLI token (deterministic but not trivially guessable without another primitive)\n\n## Remediation\n\n1. **Check actual source IP, not headers.** Use `request.ip`, `request.socket.remoteAddress`, or a trusted `X-Forwarded-For` header with known proxy configuration instead of `Host`/`Origin` for the local-only gate.\n\n2. **Make CLI token non-deterministic.** Generate a random token on first run and persist it, rather than deriving from machine ID. Machine IDs are often predictable or discoverable on cloud infrastructure.\n\n3. **Bind MCP routes to loopback at the network layer.** If MCP is local-only by design, the server should bind those routes to `127.0.0.1` only, not rely on middleware header checks.\n\n\nCredit: @snailsploit",
"id": "GHSA-6g2f-w7g3-77vf",
"modified": "2026-07-02T21:13:19Z",
"published": "2026-07-02T21:13:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/decolua/9router/security/advisories/GHSA-6g2f-w7g3-77vf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/decolua/9router/commit/5e1c1261368e06dced1cbc650684561b2c8844db"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/decolua/9router/commit/bb86808582067e4fc6f004508a919efb9970d1d5"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/decolua/9router"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "9router has an Incomplete Fix: Local-Only Access Gate Bypass in 9router via Host Header SpoofING"
}
GHSA-6GV3-7GP2-WQGF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-09 21:31 – Updated: 2025-04-10 21:31An issue in TOTVS Framework (Linha Protheus) 12.1.2310 allows attackers to bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA) via a crafted websocket message.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-55210"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-09T20:15:24Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An issue in TOTVS Framework (Linha Protheus) 12.1.2310 allows attackers to bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA) via a crafted websocket message.",
"id": "GHSA-6gv3-7gp2-wqgf",
"modified": "2025-04-10T21:31:08Z",
"published": "2025-04-09T21:31:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-55210"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/c4cnm/CVE-2024-55210"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6H98-CF9G-VMG2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:41 – Updated: 2022-09-15 19:40Electron version 1.7.0 - 1.7.5 is vulnerable to a URL Spoofing problem when opening PDFs in PDFium resulting loading arbitrary PDFs that a hacker can control.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "electron"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.7.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.7.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-1000424"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290",
"CWE-345"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-09-15T19:40:19Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2018-01-02T20:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Electron version 1.7.0 - 1.7.5 is vulnerable to a URL Spoofing problem when opening PDFs in PDFium resulting loading arbitrary PDFs that a hacker can control.",
"id": "GHSA-6h98-cf9g-vmg2",
"modified": "2022-09-15T19:40:19Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:41:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-1000424"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/electron/electron/pull/10008"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/electron/electron/pull/10008/files"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/electron/electron"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/electron/electron/releases/tag/v1.7.6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Electron vulnerable to URL spoofing via PDFium"
}
GHSA-6HF2-CHQ7-2MHH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-27 21:32 – Updated: 2024-11-19 00:32DESIGNA ABACUS v.18 and before allows an attacker to bypass the payment process via a crafted QR code.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-31802"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-27T20:15:21Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "DESIGNA ABACUS v.18 and before allows an attacker to bypass the payment process via a crafted QR code.",
"id": "GHSA-6hf2-chq7-2mhh",
"modified": "2024-11-19T00:32:42Z",
"published": "2024-06-27T21:32:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31802"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.rodrigofavarini.com.br/cybersecurity/designa-abacus-v-18-and-before-allows-an-attacker-to-bypass-the-payment-process-via-a-crafted-qr-code"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6JG6-G5FM-JQJQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-07 00:30 – Updated: 2024-02-14 21:30An issue discovered in Dronetag Drone Scanner 1.5.2 allows attackers to impersonate other drones via transmission of crafted data packets.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-22520"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-06T22:16:14Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue discovered in Dronetag Drone Scanner 1.5.2 allows attackers to impersonate other drones via transmission of crafted data packets.",
"id": "GHSA-6jg6-g5fm-jqjq",
"modified": "2024-02-14T21:30:32Z",
"published": "2024-02-07T00:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22520"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Drone-Lab/Dronetag-vulnerability"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6JRF-V33R-V8H2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-12 19:00 – Updated: 2022-10-14 19:00An authentication bypass vulnerability in the Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 8.1 web interface allows a network-based attacker with specific knowledge of the target firewall or Panorama appliance to impersonate an existing PAN-OS administrator and perform privileged actions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-0030"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-10-12T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An authentication bypass vulnerability in the Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 8.1 web interface allows a network-based attacker with specific knowledge of the target firewall or Panorama appliance to impersonate an existing PAN-OS administrator and perform privileged actions.",
"id": "GHSA-6jrf-v33r-v8h2",
"modified": "2022-10-14T19:00:40Z",
"published": "2022-10-12T19:00:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0030"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2022-0030"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6MGP-P75R-VHJM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-22 15:30 – Updated: 2025-02-13 19:00Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in Apache HugeGraph-Server.This issue affects Apache HugeGraph-Server: from 1.0.0 before 1.3.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.3.0, which fixes the issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.hugegraph:hugegraph-api"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.3.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-27349"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-22T18:37:58Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-22T14:15:07Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in Apache HugeGraph-Server.This issue affects Apache HugeGraph-Server: from 1.0.0 before 1.3.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.3.0, which fixes the issue.",
"id": "GHSA-6mgp-p75r-vhjm",
"modified": "2025-02-13T19:00:33Z",
"published": "2024-04-22T15:30:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27349"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph/commit/713d88d1fd9953c3c3e3f130389501910ba40e1d"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/dz9n9lndqfsf64t72o73r7sttrc6ocsd"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/22/4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apache HugeGraph-Server: Bypass whitelist in Auth mode"
}
GHSA-6MH7-865M-MMMR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-21 18:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 06:18Microsoft Edge for Android Spoofing Vulnerability
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-38173"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-07-21T18:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Microsoft Edge for Android Spoofing Vulnerability",
"id": "GHSA-6mh7-865m-mmmr",
"modified": "2024-04-04T06:18:38Z",
"published": "2023-07-21T18:30:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-38173"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-38173"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6P44-5X7X-8VXJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-26 00:03 – Updated: 2022-08-29 20:06A flaw was found in Samba. The KDC accepts kpasswd requests encrypted with any key known to it. By encrypting forged kpasswd requests with its own key, a user can change other users' passwords, enabling full domain takeover.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-32744"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-08-25T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A flaw was found in Samba. The KDC accepts kpasswd requests encrypted with any key known to it. By encrypting forged kpasswd requests with its own key, a user can change other users\u0027 passwords, enabling full domain takeover.",
"id": "GHSA-6p44-5x7x-8vxj",
"modified": "2022-08-29T20:06:47Z",
"published": "2022-08-26T00:03:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-32744"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2022-32744.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-21: Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers
An adversary guesses, obtains, or "rides" a trusted identifier (e.g. session ID, resource ID, cookie, etc.) to perform authorized actions under the guise of an authenticated user or service.
CAPEC-22: Exploiting Trust in Client
An attack of this type exploits vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by communicating directly with the server where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
CAPEC-461: Web Services API Signature Forgery Leveraging Hash Function Extension Weakness
An adversary utilizes a hash function extension/padding weakness, to modify the parameters passed to the web service requesting authentication by generating their own call in order to generate a legitimate signature hash (as described in the notes), without knowledge of the secret token sometimes provided by the web service.
CAPEC-473: Signature Spoof
An attacker generates a message or datablock that causes the recipient to believe that the message or datablock was generated and cryptographically signed by an authoritative or reputable source, misleading a victim or victim operating system into performing malicious actions.
CAPEC-476: Signature Spoofing by Misrepresentation
An attacker exploits a weakness in the parsing or display code of the recipient software to generate a data blob containing a supposedly valid signature, but the signer's identity is falsely represented, which can lead to the attacker manipulating the recipient software or its victim user to perform compromising actions.
CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
CAPEC-667: Bluetooth Impersonation AttackS (BIAS)
An adversary disguises the MAC address of their Bluetooth enabled device to one for which there exists an active and trusted connection and authenticates successfully. The adversary can then perform malicious actions on the target Bluetooth device depending on the target’s capabilities.
CAPEC-94: Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)
An adversary targets the communication between two components (typically client and server), in order to alter or obtain data from transactions. A general approach entails the adversary placing themself within the communication channel between the two components.