CWE-290
AllowedAuthentication Bypass by Spoofing
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
This attack-focused weakness is caused by incorrectly implemented authentication schemes that are subject to spoofing attacks.
1201 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-W3H5-P6V5-5VJM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-03 18:48 – Updated: 2024-07-03 18:48Security check loophole in HAProxy release (in combination with routing release) in Cloud Foundry prior to v40.17.0 potentially allows bypass of mTLS authentication to applications hosted on Cloud Foundry.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-37082"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-03T06:15:03Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Security check loophole in HAProxy release (in combination with routing release) in Cloud Foundry prior to v40.17.0 potentially allows bypass of mTLS authentication to applications hosted on Cloud Foundry.",
"id": "GHSA-w3h5-p6v5-5vjm",
"modified": "2024-07-03T18:48:04Z",
"published": "2024-07-03T18:48:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37082"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cloudfoundry.org/blog/cve-2024-37082-mtls-bypass"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W3JX-33QH-77F8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-12 03:30 – Updated: 2024-01-12 03:30ELAN Match-on-Chip FPR solution has design fault about potential risk of valid SID leakage and enumeration with spoof sensor. This fault leads to that Windows Hello recognition would be bypass with cloning SID to cause broken account identity. Version which is lower than 3.0.12011.08009(Legacy)/3.3.12011.08103(ESS) would suffer this risk on DELL Inspiron platform.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-0454"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-12T02:15:44Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "ELAN Match-on-Chip FPR solution has design fault about potential risk of valid SID leakage and enumeration with spoof sensor.\nThis fault leads to that Windows Hello recognition would be bypass with cloning SID to cause broken account identity.\nVersion which is lower than 3.0.12011.08009(Legacy)/3.3.12011.08103(ESS) would suffer this risk on DELL Inspiron platform.",
"id": "GHSA-w3jx-33qh-77f8",
"modified": "2024-01-12T03:30:49Z",
"published": "2024-01-12T03:30:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0454"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w3jx-33qh-77f8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.emc.com.tw/emc/tw/vulnerability-disclosure-policy"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W3MG-G64H-4H34
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:02 – Updated: 2023-08-02 00:30Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-31198.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-31195"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-05-11T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-31198.",
"id": "GHSA-w3mg-g64h-4h34",
"modified": "2023-08-02T00:30:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:02:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-31195"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31195"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W3VW-MGPX-6MJP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:20 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:20A spoofing vulnerability exists in Microsoft Exchange Server when Outlook Web Access (OWA) fails to properly handle web requests, aka "Microsoft Exchange Spoofing Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Exchange Server.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-8153"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-05-09T19:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A spoofing vulnerability exists in Microsoft Exchange Server when Outlook Web Access (OWA) fails to properly handle web requests, aka \"Microsoft Exchange Spoofing Vulnerability.\" This affects Microsoft Exchange Server.",
"id": "GHSA-w3vw-mgpx-6mjp",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:20:41Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:20:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-8153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2018-8153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104045"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040850"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W3WF-CFX3-6GCX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-11 23:59 – Updated: 2022-02-11 23:59Impact
Due to issues in Go's standard library XML parsing, a valid SAML response may be mutated by an attacker to modify the trusted document. This can result in allowing unverified logins from a SAML IdP.
Users that configure Fleet with SSO login may be vulnerable to this issue.
Patches
This issue is patched in 3.5.1 using https://github.com/mattermost/xml-roundtrip-validator.
Workarounds
If upgrade to 3.5.1 is not possible, users should disable SSO authentication in Fleet.
References
See https://mattermost.com/blog/coordinated-disclosure-go-xml-vulnerabilities/ for more information about the underlying vulnerabilities.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Email us at security@fleetdm.com * Join #fleet in osquery Slack
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.5.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-26276"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-21T20:46:21Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2020-12-17T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\nDue to issues in Go\u0027s standard library XML parsing, a valid SAML response may be mutated by an attacker to modify the trusted document. This can result in allowing unverified logins from a SAML IdP.\n\nUsers that configure Fleet with SSO login may be vulnerable to this issue.\n\n### Patches\nThis issue is patched in 3.5.1 using https://github.com/mattermost/xml-roundtrip-validator.\n\n### Workarounds\nIf upgrade to 3.5.1 is not possible, users should disable SSO authentication in Fleet.\n\n### References\nSee https://mattermost.com/blog/coordinated-disclosure-go-xml-vulnerabilities/ for more information about the underlying vulnerabilities.\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Email us at [security@fleetdm.com](mailto:security@fleetdm.com)\n* Join #fleet in [osquery Slack](https://join.slack.com/t/osquery/shared_invite/zt-h29zm0gk-s2DBtGUTW4CFel0f0IjTEw)",
"id": "GHSA-w3wf-cfx3-6gcx",
"modified": "2022-02-11T23:59:14Z",
"published": "2022-02-11T23:59:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fleetdm/fleet/security/advisories/GHSA-w3wf-cfx3-6gcx"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-26276"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fleetdm/fleet/commit/57812a532e5f749c8e18c6f6a652eca65c083607"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fleetdm/fleet/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#fleet-351-dec-14-2020"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mattermost/xml-roundtrip-validator"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mattermost.com/blog/coordinated-disclosure-go-xml-vulnerabilities"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "SAML authentication vulnerability due to stdlib XML parsing"
}
GHSA-W44J-QC22-M82H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-07 18:31 – Updated: 2026-09-07 18:31In JetBrains YouTrack before 2025.3.161254, 2026.1.14042 improper authentication in YouTrack Helpdesk allowed unauthenticated account takeover via a self-asserted email address
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-86478"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-07T17:17:25Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In JetBrains YouTrack before 2025.3.161254, \n2026.1.14042 improper authentication in YouTrack Helpdesk allowed unauthenticated account takeover via a self-asserted email address",
"id": "GHSA-w44j-qc22-m82h",
"modified": "2026-09-07T18:31:32Z",
"published": "2026-09-07T18:31:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-86478"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jetbrains.com/privacy-security/issues-fixed"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W4QR-7HMF-8W6R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-14 18:30 – Updated: 2025-10-14 18:30A Secure Boot Bypass Vulnerability exists in affected Access Points that allows an adversary to bypass the hardware root of trust verification in place to ensure only vendor-signed firmware can execute on the device. An adversary can exploit this vulnerability to run modified or custom firmware on affected Access Points.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-37147"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-14T17:15:41Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A Secure Boot Bypass Vulnerability exists in affected Access Points that allows an adversary to bypass the hardware root of trust verification in place to ensure only vendor-signed firmware can execute on the device. An adversary can exploit this vulnerability to run modified or custom firmware on affected Access Points.",
"id": "GHSA-w4qr-7hmf-8w6r",
"modified": "2025-10-14T18:30:29Z",
"published": "2025-10-14T18:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37147"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw04958en_us\u0026docLocale=en_US"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W4W5-G48Q-278G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-21 06:31 – Updated: 2025-12-21 06:31Yealink RPS before 2025-06-27 allows unauthorized access to information, including AutoP URL addresses. This was fixed by deploying an enhanced authentication mechanism through a security update to all cloud instances.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-68644"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-21T04:16:05Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Yealink RPS before 2025-06-27 allows unauthorized access to information, including AutoP URL addresses. This was fixed by deploying an enhanced authentication mechanism through a security update to all cloud instances.",
"id": "GHSA-w4w5-g48q-278g",
"modified": "2025-12-21T06:31:11Z",
"published": "2025-12-21T06:31:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68644"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.yealink.com/en/trust-center/security-bulletins/yealink-unauthorized-access-to-rps-vulnerability"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.yealink.com/website-service/download/Yealink_RPS_Security_Remediation_Verification_Report.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W56W-W5XR-Q52M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-10 21:31 – Updated: 2025-03-11 21:30Certain crafted MIME email messages that claimed to contain an encrypted OpenPGP message, which instead contained an OpenPGP signed message, were wrongly shown as being encrypted. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 136 and Thunderbird < 128.8.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-26696"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-10T19:15:40Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Certain crafted MIME email messages that claimed to contain an encrypted OpenPGP message, which instead contained an OpenPGP signed message, were wrongly shown as being encrypted. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird \u003c 136 and Thunderbird \u003c 128.8.",
"id": "GHSA-w56w-w5xr-q52m",
"modified": "2025-03-11T21:30:34Z",
"published": "2025-03-10T21:31:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-26696"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1864205"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2025-17"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2025-18"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W59W-35Q3-VCG7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-04 09:30 – Updated: 2025-01-24 18:31By default the CloudStack management server honours the x-forwarded-for HTTP header and logs it as the source IP of an API request. This could lead to authentication bypass and other operational problems should an attacker decide to spoof their IP address this way. Users are recommended to upgrade to CloudStack version 4.18.1.1 or 4.19.0.1, which fixes this issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-29006"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-04T08:15:06Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "By default the CloudStack management server honours the x-forwarded-for HTTP header and logs it as the source IP of an API request. This could lead to authentication bypass and other operational problems should an attacker decide to spoof their IP address this way. Users are recommended to upgrade to CloudStack version 4.18.1.1 or 4.19.0.1, which fixes this issue.\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-w59w-35q3-vcg7",
"modified": "2025-01-24T18:31:08Z",
"published": "2024-04-04T09:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-29006"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/82f46pv7mvh95ybto5hn8wlo6g8jhjvp"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-21: Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers
An adversary guesses, obtains, or "rides" a trusted identifier (e.g. session ID, resource ID, cookie, etc.) to perform authorized actions under the guise of an authenticated user or service.
CAPEC-22: Exploiting Trust in Client
An attack of this type exploits vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by communicating directly with the server where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
CAPEC-461: Web Services API Signature Forgery Leveraging Hash Function Extension Weakness
An adversary utilizes a hash function extension/padding weakness, to modify the parameters passed to the web service requesting authentication by generating their own call in order to generate a legitimate signature hash (as described in the notes), without knowledge of the secret token sometimes provided by the web service.
CAPEC-473: Signature Spoof
An attacker generates a message or datablock that causes the recipient to believe that the message or datablock was generated and cryptographically signed by an authoritative or reputable source, misleading a victim or victim operating system into performing malicious actions.
CAPEC-476: Signature Spoofing by Misrepresentation
An attacker exploits a weakness in the parsing or display code of the recipient software to generate a data blob containing a supposedly valid signature, but the signer's identity is falsely represented, which can lead to the attacker manipulating the recipient software or its victim user to perform compromising actions.
CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
CAPEC-667: Bluetooth Impersonation AttackS (BIAS)
An adversary disguises the MAC address of their Bluetooth enabled device to one for which there exists an active and trusted connection and authenticates successfully. The adversary can then perform malicious actions on the target Bluetooth device depending on the target’s capabilities.
CAPEC-94: Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)
An adversary targets the communication between two components (typically client and server), in order to alter or obtain data from transactions. A general approach entails the adversary placing themself within the communication channel between the two components.