CWE-269

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "motioneye"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.44.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22",
      "CWE-269",
      "CWE-306",
      "CWE-347",
      "CWE-434"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-23T18:53:04Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\nA multi\u2011stage chain in motionEye leads to remote code execution. The chain combines:\n\n1. **Arbitrary file read (LFI)** via the picture download endpoint for **local motion cameras** using absolute paths.\n2. **Pass\u2011the\u2011hash admin auth** due to accepting request signatures computed with password hashes.\n3. **Unsafe config restore** that extracts attacker\u2011controlled tarballs into `CONF_PATH`.\n4. **Unauthenticated action execution** via `/action/\u003cid\u003e/\u003caction\u003e`.\n\nIf the **normal user password is unset**, the chain becomes **unauthenticated RCE**. If a normal password exists, a **normal user** can still achieve **admin escalation and RCE**.\n\n---\n\n## Affected Code (motionEye repo)\n\n### 1) LFI (absolute path) \u2014 `picture/\u003cid\u003e/download`\n**Files:**\n- `motioneye/motioneye/handlers/picture.py` \u2192 `download()` (local motion camera branch)\n- `motioneye/motioneye/mediafiles.py` \u2192 `get_media_content()`\n\n**Issue:** `get_media_content()` only blocks `..` and then joins `target_dir` with `path`. Absolute paths (e.g. `/etc/hosts`) bypass the join and are read directly.\n\n### 2) Pass\u2011the\u2011hash admin auth\n**File:** `motioneye/motioneye/handlers/base.py` \u2192 `get_current_user()`\n\n**Issue:** The signature check allows signatures computed using the **admin password hash** (SHA1) as the key. If the hash is leaked (via LFI), admin access can be obtained without the plaintext password.\n\n### 3) Unsafe restore (tar extraction)\n**File:** `motioneye/motioneye/config.py` \u2192 `restore()`\n\n**Issue:** `tar zxC CONF_PATH` is used on user\u2011supplied data without sanitizing entries. A crafted tar can drop executable files into `CONF_PATH`.\n\n### 4) Unauthenticated action execution\n**File:** `motioneye/motioneye/handlers/action.py` \u2192 `post()`\n\n**Issue:** No authentication decorator is present. It executes `\u003caction\u003e_\u003ccamera_id\u003e` found in `CONF_PATH` with `subprocess.Popen`.\n\n---\n\n## Exploit Chain (Detailed)\n\n1. **Create or find a local motion camera id** (local motion cameras are required for the vulnerable LFI path).\n2. **LFI via picture download**:\n   - Request: `/picture/\u003cid\u003e/download/\u003cabsolute_path\u003e`\n   - Example: `/picture/1/download/%2Fetc%2Fhosts`\n   - Result: Arbitrary file read.\n3. **Read admin hash** from `/etc/motioneye/motion.conf`:\n   - Contains `@admin_password \u003cSHA1_HASH\u003e`.\n4. **Pass\u2011the\u2011hash admin**:\n   - Compute signature for `/config/restore?_username=admin` using the **hash** as key.\n   - Admin access is accepted with hash\u2011based signatures.\n5. **Restore malicious tar**:\n   - Upload a tar containing `lock_\u003cid\u003e` (or any action) as an executable.\n   - File is written into `CONF_PATH` by restore.\n6. **Trigger unauth action**:\n   - POST `/action/\u003cid\u003e/lock`\n   - The server executes the injected file.\n\n---\n\n## Proof of Execution (Observed Output)\nIn local testing, the injected action created a marker file:\n\n```\n/tmp/meye_rce_ok\n```\n\nVerification command:\n```\ndocker exec -it motioneye ls -la /tmp | grep meye_rce_ok\n```\nExample output:\n```\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 ... /tmp/meye_rce_ok\n```\n\n---\n\n## Preconditions / Requirements\n\n- At least **one local motion camera** exists (e.g., `netcam_url`, `videodevice`).\n- `picture/\u003cid\u003e/download` is reachable:\n  - **Unauth** if `@normal_password` is empty (default in some installs).\n  - **Auth required** if normal password is set (attacker needs normal creds).\n\n---\n\n## Impact\n- **Unauth RCE** (normal password unset).\n- **Authenticated RCE** (normal user \u2192 admin \u2192 RCE).\n- Arbitrary file read on server filesystem.\n- Full compromise of motionEye process account.\n\n---\n\n## Suggested Fixes\n1. **Block absolute paths** in `get_media_content()` and `get_media_path()`.\n2. **Remove hash\u2011based signature acceptance**; only accept signatures computed with plaintext passwords.\n3. **Harden restore**: reject absolute paths, `..`, symlinks, non\u2011regular files.\n4. **Require authentication** on `ActionHandler` (admin\u2011only).",
  "id": "GHSA-qxvg-h7q2-hcxh",
  "modified": "2026-06-23T18:53:04Z",
  "published": "2026-06-23T18:53:04Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/motioneye-project/motioneye/security/advisories/GHSA-qxvg-h7q2-hcxh"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/motioneye-project/motioneye"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "motionEye: LFI \u2192 pass\u2011the\u2011hash admin \u2192 unsafe restore \u2192 unauth action exec (RCE)"
}

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-0188"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-06-11T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In onCreatePermissionRequest of SettingsSliceProvider.java, there is a possible permissions bypass due to a PendingIntent error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10Android ID: A-147355897",
  "id": "GHSA-r22m-hxxc-jhh4",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:20:16Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:20:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-0188"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/pixel/2020-06-01"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-5957"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-03-05T20:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver, all versions, contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA Control Panel component in which an attacker with local system access can corrupt a system file, which may lead to denial of service or escalation of privileges.",
  "id": "GHSA-r259-m89p-gjgg",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:10:18Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:10:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-5957"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4996"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-8258"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-12-14T20:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Improper privilege management on services run by Citrix Gateway Plug-in for Windows, versions before and including 13.0-61.48 and 12.1-58.15, allows an attacker to modify arbitrary files.",
  "id": "GHSA-r269-87mv-8wp9",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:36:22Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:36:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-8258"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX282684"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-53706"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-09T07:15:27Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the Gen7 SonicOS Cloud platform NSv, allows a remote authenticated local low-privileged attacker to elevate privileges to `root` and potentially lead to code execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-r2cp-qxjw-69v8",
  "modified": "2025-01-09T18:32:13Z",
  "published": "2025-01-09T09:31:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53706"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2025-0003"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-22254"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-06-10T17:21:08Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An Improper Privilege Management vulnerability [CWE-269] affecting Fortinet FortiOS version 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, 7.0.0 through 7.0.16 and before 6.4.15, FortiProxy version 7.6.0 through 7.6.1 and before 7.4.7 \u0026 FortiWeb version 7.6.0 through 7.6.1 and before 7.4.6 allows an authenticated attacker with at least read-only admin permissions to gain super-admin privileges via crafted requests to\u00a0Node.js websocket module.",
  "id": "GHSA-r2j8-539m-45q5",
  "modified": "2026-01-14T15:32:57Z",
  "published": "2025-06-10T18:32:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22254"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-006"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-2317"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-08-01T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "The Simple Membership WordPress plugin before 4.1.3 allows user to change their membership at the registration stage due to insufficient checking of a user supplied parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-r2wm-jmvh-5q98",
  "modified": "2022-08-06T00:00:36Z",
  "published": "2022-08-02T00:00:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2317"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/77b7ca19-294c-4480-8f57-6fddfc67fffb"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.35.3"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "vaultwarden"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.35.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-27802"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269",
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-04T20:07:21Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nA Manager account (`access_all=false`) was able to escalate privileges by directly invoking the **bulk-access API** against collections that were not originally assigned to them.\nThe API allowed changing `assigned=false` to `assigned=true`, resulting in unauthorized access.\n\nAdditionally, prior to the bulk-access call, the regular single-update API correctly returned **401 Unauthorized** for the same collection. After executing the bulk-access API, the same update API returned **200 OK**, confirming an authorization gap at the HTTP level.\n\n---\n\n## Description\n\n* The endpoint accepts `ManagerHeadersLoose` and does not validate access rights for the specified `collectionIds`.\n  src/api/core/organizations.rs:551\n\n  ```rust\n  headers: ManagerHeadersLoose,\n  ```\n\n* The received `collection_ids` are processed directly without per-collection authorization checks.\n  src/api/core/organizations.rs:564\n\n  ```rust\n  for col_id in data.collection_ids {\n  ```\n\n* Existing group assignments for the collection are deleted.\n  src/api/core/organizations.rs:583\n\n  ```rust\n  CollectionGroup::delete_all_by_collection(\u0026col_id, \u0026conn).await?;\n  ```\n\n* Existing user assignments for the collection are deleted.\n  src/api/core/organizations.rs:590\n\n  ```rust\n  CollectionUser::delete_all_by_collection(\u0026col_id, \u0026conn).await?;\n  ```\n\n* By comparison, another bulk-processing endpoint performs per-collection validation using `from_loose`.\n  src/api/core/organizations.rs:787\n\n  ```rust\n  let headers = ManagerHeaders::from_loose(headers, \u0026collections, \u0026conn).await?;\n  ```\n\n* The actual access control logic is implemented in `can_access_collection`, which is not invoked in the bulk-access endpoint.\n  src/auth.rs:911\n\n  ```rust\n  if !Collection::can_access_collection(\u0026h.membership, col_id, conn).await {\n  ```\n\n---\n\n## Preconditions\n\n* The attacker possesses a valid **Manager account** within the target organization.\n* The organization contains collections that are **not assigned** to the attacker.\n* The attacker can authenticate through the standard API login process (Owner/Admin privileges are not required).\n\n---\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\n\n1. Log in as a Manager and obtain a Bearer token.\n\u003cimg width=\"4016\" height=\"1690\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/218f05e2-6a2e-4066-8f8d-6bbef1cc5858\" /\u003e\n\n2. Confirm the current values of `assigned`, `manage`, `readOnly`, and `hidePasswords` for the target collection.\n\u003cimg width=\"4026\" height=\"1694\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a6d2fc70-5370-4984-85bd-a6f74febdfa3\" /\u003e\n\n3. Verify that the standard update API returns **401 Unauthorized** when attempting to modify the unassigned collection.\n\u003cimg width=\"4030\" height=\"1708\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/802f0d2b-d474-44d2-beef-b4f7f3335225\" /\u003e\n\n4. Invoke the bulk-access API, including:\n\u003cimg width=\"4036\" height=\"1120\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1d3caa01-3ac2-4636-9ed0-189e5923c986\" /\u003e\n\n   * `collectionIds` containing the target collection\n   * `users` containing the attacker\u2019s own `membership_id`\n     Confirm that the API returns **200 OK**.\n\n5. Re-run the standard update API.\n   Confirm that it now succeeds and that the previously unauthorized modification is applied.\n\u003cimg width=\"4040\" height=\"1440\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/340e9676-d802-404c-b894-9986a176360a\" /\u003e\n\n---\n\n## Required Minimum Privileges\n\n* Manager role within the target organization\n  (the issue occurs even when `access_all=false`)\n\n---\n\n## Attack Scenario\n\nA delegated administrator or department-level Manager within an organization directly calls the API to add themselves to unauthorized collections and gain access to confidential information.\n\nBecause the bulk update process deletes and reassigns existing permissions, the attacker can also remove other users\u2019 access, enabling denial-of-service or sabotage within the organization.\n\n---\n\n## Potential Impact\n\n* **Confidentiality:** Unauthorized access to sensitive information within restricted collections.\n* **Integrity:** Unauthorized modification of collection permission settings and arbitrary changes to access controls.\n* **Availability:** Deletion of existing assignments may cause legitimate users to lose access.",
  "id": "GHSA-r32r-j5jq-3w4m",
  "modified": "2026-03-04T20:07:21Z",
  "published": "2026-03-04T20:07:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/security/advisories/GHSA-r32r-j5jq-3w4m"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Vaultwarden has Privilege Escalation via Bulk Permission Update to Unauthorized Collections by Manager"
}

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-1754"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-03-28T01:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the authorization subsystem of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated but unprivileged (level 1), remote attacker to run privileged Cisco IOS commands by using the web UI. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of user privileges of web UI users. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a malicious payload to a specific endpoint in the web UI. A successful exploit could allow the lower-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary commands with higher privileges on the affected device.",
  "id": "GHSA-r338-g5vj-mxfp",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:14:47Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:14:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-1754"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20190327-iosxe-privesc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107590"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-3482"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-11-18T19:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) server component of Cisco Expressway software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass security controls and send network traffic to restricted destinations. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of specific connection information by the TURN server within the affected software. An attacker could exploit this issue by sending specially crafted network traffic to the affected software. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send traffic through the affected software to destinations beyond the application, possibly allowing the attacker to gain unauthorized network access.",
  "id": "GHSA-r379-mpqq-hxmh",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:34:35Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:34:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-3482"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-Expressway-8J3yZ7hV"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}