Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-190

Allowed

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

4357 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-XW82-FPCP-CG6Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-19 21:30 – Updated: 2026-08-19 21:30
VLAI
Details

Power Systems Firmware FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, and FW1060.00 through FW1060.80 is affected by a vulnerability in the host firmware. An attacker with service access to the service processor can supply a carefully crafted command that could leak the contents of hardware registers that should be inaccessible to the service processor. Successful exploitation could result in limited confidentiality or availability impacts to the affected host system.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-19321"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-19T19:17:12Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Power Systems Firmware FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, and FW1060.00 through FW1060.80 is affected by a vulnerability in the host firmware. An attacker with service access to the service processor can supply a carefully crafted command that could leak the contents of hardware registers that should be inaccessible to the service processor. Successful exploitation could result in limited confidentiality or availability impacts to the affected host system.",
  "id": "GHSA-xw82-fpcp-cg6q",
  "modified": "2026-08-19T21:30:32Z",
  "published": "2026-08-19T21:30:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-19321"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283222"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XW8P-6VV6-4C5G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-04 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-13 00:00
VLAI
Details

RIOT OS version 2020.01.1 is vulnerable to integer wrap-around in its implementation of calloc function, which can lead to arbitrary memory allocation, resulting in unexpected behavior such as a crash or a remote code injection/execution.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-27427"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-05-03T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "RIOT OS version 2020.01.1 is vulnerable to integer wrap-around in its implementation of calloc function, which can lead to arbitrary memory allocation, resulting in unexpected behavior such as a crash or a remote code injection/execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-xw8p-6vv6-4c5g",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T00:00:51Z",
  "published": "2022-05-04T00:00:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27427"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-21-119-04"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XWG4-73V4-XW9W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-01 19:23 – Updated: 2026-09-01 19:23
VLAI
Summary
nanoid: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Details

Summary

An integer overflow in nanoid(size) permanently corrupts the process-wide CSPRNG pool, causing all subsequent ID generation to return the deterministic string "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu". Any application that passes user-influenced values to the size parameter loses all randomness guarantees for session tokens, CSRF tokens, and unique identifiers until process restart.

Details

nanoid() at index.js:101 coerces the size parameter with size |= 0, which converts it to a signed 32-bit integer. When size >= 2^31 (e.g., 2147483648), this wraps to -2147483648.

The negative value is passed to fillPool() (index.js:15):

function fillPool(bytes) {
  if (!pool || pool.length < bytes) {       // false: pool exists, -2B < pool.length
    pool = Buffer.allocUnsafe(bytes * POOL_SIZE_MULTIPLIER)
    crypto.getRandomValues(pool)
    poolOffset = 0
  } else if (poolOffset + bytes > pool.length) {  // false: poolOffset + (-2B) < pool.length
    crypto.getRandomValues(pool)
    poolOffset = 0
  }
  poolOffset += bytes  // poolOffset += -2147483648 → deeply negative
}

Neither branch triggers, so the pool is never refreshed. poolOffset becomes ~-2.1 billion.

Subsequent nanoid() calls execute:

for (let i = poolOffset - size; i < poolOffset; i++) {
  id += scopedUrlAlphabet[pool[i] & 63]
}

pool[negative_index] returns undefined. undefined & 63 evaluates to 0. urlAlphabet[0] is 'u'. Every ID becomes "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu".

The corruption is persistent — it affects all subsequent calls in the process until ~100 million calls eventually wrap poolOffset back to positive, or the process restarts.

PoC

import { nanoid } from 'nanoid'

// Step 1: Normal operation
console.log(nanoid())  // e.g., "V1StGXR8_Z5jdHi6B-myT"

// Step 2: Trigger overflow (e.g., from an API parameter)
try { nanoid(2147483648) } catch(e) {}

// Step 3: All subsequent IDs are deterministic
console.log(nanoid())  // "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu"
console.log(nanoid())  // "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu"
console.log(nanoid())  // "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu"
// ... forever, process-wide

Run with: node --experimental-vm-modules poc.mjs

Attack scenario: Any API endpoint that accepts a user-controlled length/size parameter (URL shortener slug length, configurable token size, etc.) and passes it to nanoid(userInput).

Impact

Complete loss of ID unpredictability and uniqueness, process-wide, from a single request.

  • All session IDs, CSRF tokens, API keys, and database identifiers generated after the attack are identical and predictable
  • An attacker can predict all tokens issued to other users, enabling session hijacking and authentication bypass
  • The corruption is persistent (survives across requests) and affects all consumers of nanoid in the same process
  • No special privileges or preconditions required — a single unauthenticated request is sufficient
  • Affects any application that passes external input to the size parameter without validation
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "nanoid"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.3.12"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "nanoid"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.1.11"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-73086"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-01T19:23:45Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-11T17:19:16Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nAn integer overflow in `nanoid(size)` permanently corrupts the process-wide CSPRNG pool, causing all subsequent ID generation to return the deterministic string `\"uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu\"`. Any application that passes user-influenced values to the `size` parameter loses all randomness guarantees for session tokens, CSRF tokens, and unique identifiers until process restart.\n\n### Details\n\n`nanoid()` at [`index.js:101`](https://github.com/ai/nanoid/blob/main/index.js#L101) coerces the `size` parameter with `size |= 0`, which converts it to a signed 32-bit integer. When `size \u003e= 2^31` (e.g., `2147483648`), this wraps to `-2147483648`.\n\nThe negative value is passed to `fillPool()` ([`index.js:15`](https://github.com/ai/nanoid/blob/main/index.js#L15)):\n\n```javascript\nfunction fillPool(bytes) {\n  if (!pool || pool.length \u003c bytes) {       // false: pool exists, -2B \u003c pool.length\n    pool = Buffer.allocUnsafe(bytes * POOL_SIZE_MULTIPLIER)\n    crypto.getRandomValues(pool)\n    poolOffset = 0\n  } else if (poolOffset + bytes \u003e pool.length) {  // false: poolOffset + (-2B) \u003c pool.length\n    crypto.getRandomValues(pool)\n    poolOffset = 0\n  }\n  poolOffset += bytes  // poolOffset += -2147483648 \u2192 deeply negative\n}\n```\n\nNeither branch triggers, so the pool is never refreshed. `poolOffset` becomes ~-2.1 billion.\n\nSubsequent `nanoid()` calls execute:\n```javascript\nfor (let i = poolOffset - size; i \u003c poolOffset; i++) {\n  id += scopedUrlAlphabet[pool[i] \u0026 63]\n}\n```\n\n`pool[negative_index]` returns `undefined`. `undefined \u0026 63` evaluates to `0`. `urlAlphabet[0]` is `\u0027u\u0027`. Every ID becomes `\"uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu\"`.\n\nThe corruption is **persistent** \u2014 it affects all subsequent calls in the process until ~100 million calls eventually wrap `poolOffset` back to positive, or the process restarts.\n\n### PoC\n\n```javascript\nimport { nanoid } from \u0027nanoid\u0027\n\n// Step 1: Normal operation\nconsole.log(nanoid())  // e.g., \"V1StGXR8_Z5jdHi6B-myT\"\n\n// Step 2: Trigger overflow (e.g., from an API parameter)\ntry { nanoid(2147483648) } catch(e) {}\n\n// Step 3: All subsequent IDs are deterministic\nconsole.log(nanoid())  // \"uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu\"\nconsole.log(nanoid())  // \"uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu\"\nconsole.log(nanoid())  // \"uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu\"\n// ... forever, process-wide\n```\n\nRun with: `node --experimental-vm-modules poc.mjs`\n\nAttack scenario: Any API endpoint that accepts a user-controlled length/size parameter (URL shortener slug length, configurable token size, etc.) and passes it to `nanoid(userInput)`.\n\n### Impact\n\n**Complete loss of ID unpredictability and uniqueness, process-wide, from a single request.**\n\n- All session IDs, CSRF tokens, API keys, and database identifiers generated after the attack are identical and predictable\n- An attacker can predict all tokens issued to other users, enabling session hijacking and authentication bypass\n- The corruption is persistent (survives across requests) and affects all consumers of `nanoid` in the same process\n- No special privileges or preconditions required \u2014 a single unauthenticated request is sufficient\n- Affects any application that passes external input to the `size` parameter without validation",
  "id": "GHSA-xwg4-73v4-xw9w",
  "modified": "2026-09-01T19:23:45Z",
  "published": "2026-09-01T19:23:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ai/nanoid/security/advisories/GHSA-xwg4-73v4-xw9w"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-73086"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ai/nanoid/commit/7087969281cab8ba8ae3babf1894e819068b3bb4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ai/nanoid/commit/821dfed7b5db7f88e92f56c60eef32c8135077c3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ai/nanoid/commit/b0036ed60dc9facd7f1191a50dfb3076500202ac"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ai/nanoid"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ai/nanoid/releases/tag/3.3.12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ai/nanoid/releases/tag/5.1.11"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "nanoid: Integer Overflow or Wraparound"
}

GHSA-XWGC-VV45-5JGH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:09 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:09
VLAI
Details

A buffer overflow vulnerability in the vlc_input_attachment_New component of VideoLAN VLC Media Player 3.0.11 allows attackers to cause an out-of-bounds read via a crafted .avi file.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-25803"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-120",
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-07-26T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A buffer overflow vulnerability in the vlc_input_attachment_New component of VideoLAN VLC Media Player 3.0.11 allows attackers to cause an out-of-bounds read via a crafted .avi file.",
  "id": "GHSA-xwgc-vv45-5jgh",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:09:12Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:09:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-25803"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://code.videolan.org/videolan/vlc-3.0/-/commit/56cbe9c4b59edbdc5e1bb2687992f3bbf492eccb"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XWHW-9P7R-3VQ8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-31 00:00 – Updated: 2022-09-02 00:01
VLAI
Details

Xpdf prior to 4.04 lacked an integer overflow check in JPXStream.cc.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-24107"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-08-30T04:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Xpdf prior to 4.04 lacked an integer overflow check in JPXStream.cc.",
  "id": "GHSA-xwhw-9p7r-3vq8",
  "modified": "2022-09-02T00:01:02Z",
  "published": "2022-08-31T00:00:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-24107"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://dl.xpdfreader.com/old/xpdf-4.04.tar.gz"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://dl.xpdfreader.com/xpdf-4.04.tar.gz"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.xpdfreader.com/old-versions.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.xpdfreader.com/security-fixes.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XWJ3-M7CH-J848

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-06 15:30 – Updated: 2024-05-06 15:30
VLAI
Details

Memory corruption in HLOS while checking for the storage type.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-43530"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-06T15:15:21Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Memory corruption in HLOS while checking for the storage type.",
  "id": "GHSA-xwj3-m7ch-j848",
  "modified": "2024-05-06T15:30:39Z",
  "published": "2024-05-06T15:30:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-43530"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.qualcomm.com/product/publicresources/securitybulletin/may-2024-bulletin.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XWMF-VQ46-MHWP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 06:10 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:35
VLAI
Details

Integer overflow in Adobe Shockwave Player before 11.5.7.609 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .dir (aka Director) file.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-0130"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2010-05-13T17:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Integer overflow in Adobe Shockwave Player before 11.5.7.609 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .dir (aka Director) file.",
  "id": "GHSA-xwmf-vq46-mhwp",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T03:35:11Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T06:10:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0130"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A7108"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/38751"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2010-22"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-12.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/511263/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40084"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1128"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XWQR-XMGG-J69Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-01-28 22:59 – Updated: 2023-04-26 22:14
VLAI
Summary
Integer overflow in solana_rbpf
Details

From version 0.2.14 to 0.2.16 for Solana rBPF, function "relocate" in the file src/elf.rs has an integer overflow bug because the sym.st_value is read directly from ELF file without checking. If the sym.st_value is rather large, an integer overflow is triggered while calculating the variable "addr" via addr = (sym.st_value + refd_pa) as u64

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "solana_rbpf"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.2.14"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.2.17"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-46102"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-01-28T19:06:48Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-01-27T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "From version 0.2.14 to 0.2.16 for Solana rBPF, function \"relocate\" in the file src/elf.rs has an integer overflow bug because the sym.st_value is read directly from ELF file without checking. If the sym.st_value is rather large, an integer overflow is triggered while calculating the variable \"addr\" via `addr = (sym.st_value + refd_pa) as u64`",
  "id": "GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q",
  "modified": "2023-04-26T22:14:09Z",
  "published": "2022-01-28T22:59:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-46102"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/solana-labs/rbpf/pull/200"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/solana-labs/rbpf/pull/236"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blocksecteam.medium.com/new-integer-overflow-bug-discovered-in-solana-rbpf-7729717159ee"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/solana-labs/rbpf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/solana-labs/rbpf/blob/c14764850f0b83b58aa013248eaf6d65836c1218/src/elf.rs#L609-L630"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/solana-labs/rbpf/releases/tag/v0.2.17"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Integer overflow in solana_rbpf"
}

GHSA-XWV3-34J2-7JGX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-25 03:30 – Updated: 2024-09-25 03:30
VLAI
Details

Integer overflow in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 129.0.6668.70 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory write via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-9123"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190",
      "CWE-472"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-09-25T01:15:48Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Integer overflow in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 129.0.6668.70 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory write via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)",
  "id": "GHSA-xwv3-34j2-7jgx",
  "modified": "2024-09-25T03:30:36Z",
  "published": "2024-09-25T03:30:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-9123"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2024/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_24.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/365884464"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XX2V-HW92-QXMX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-05 00:31 – Updated: 2026-06-05 18:31
VLAI
Details

Integer overflow in Fonts in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-11299"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-125",
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-05T00:17:07Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Integer overflow in Fonts in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)",
  "id": "GHSA-xx2v-hw92-qxmx",
  "modified": "2026-06-05T18:31:39Z",
  "published": "2026-06-05T00:31:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11299"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/502598424"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Requirements

Ensure that all protocols are strictly defined, such that all out-of-bounds behavior can be identified simply, and require strict conformance to the protocol.

Mitigation MIT-3
Requirements

Strategy: Language Selection

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
  • Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
Mitigation MIT-8
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range.
  • Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum values.
Mitigation MIT-36
Implementation
  • Understand the programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]
  • Also be careful to account for 32-bit, 64-bit, and other potential differences that may affect the numeric representation.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design

For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

Mitigation MIT-26
Implementation

Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening

Examine compiler warnings closely and eliminate problems with potential security implications, such as signed / unsigned mismatch in memory operations, or use of uninitialized variables. Even if the weakness is rarely exploitable, a single failure may lead to the compromise of the entire system.

CAPEC-92: Forced Integer Overflow

This attack forces an integer variable to go out of range. The integer variable is often used as an offset such as size of memory allocation or similarly. The attacker would typically control the value of such variable and try to get it out of range. For instance the integer in question is incremented past the maximum possible value, it may wrap to become a very small, or negative number, therefore providing a very incorrect value which can lead to unexpected behavior. At worst the attacker can execute arbitrary code.