Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-141

Allowed

Improper Neutralization of Parameter/Argument Delimiters

Abstraction: Variant · Status: Draft

The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could be interpreted as parameter or argument delimiters when they are sent to a downstream component.

15 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-6HFP-GFWW-3G4C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-17 12:31 – Updated: 2025-10-17 12:31
VLAI
Details

Some versions of Hikvision's iSecure Center Product contain insufficient parameter validation, resulting in a command injection vulnerability. Attackers may exploit this to gain platform privileges and execute arbitrary commands on the system.iSecure Center is software released for China's domestic market only, with no overseas release.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-28815"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-141"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-17T12:15:37Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Some versions of Hikvision\u0027s iSecure Center Product contain insufficient parameter validation, resulting in a command injection vulnerability. Attackers may exploit this to gain platform privileges and execute arbitrary commands on the system.iSecure Center is software released for China\u0027s domestic market only, with no overseas release.",
  "id": "GHSA-6hfp-gfww-3g4c",
  "modified": "2025-10-17T12:31:17Z",
  "published": "2025-10-17T12:31:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28815"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.hikvision.com/cn/support/CybersecurityCenter/SecurityNotices/2023-04"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JG72-RMMW-HP49

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-29 21:30 – Updated: 2024-04-29 21:30
VLAI
Details

The Grandstream UCM Series IP PBX before firmware version 1.0.20.52 is affected by a parameter injection vulnerability in the HTTP interface. A remote and authenticated attacker can execute arbitrary code by sending a crafted HTTP request. Authentication may be possible using a default user and password. Affected models are the UCM6202, UCM6204, UCM6208, and UCM6510.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-0840"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-141"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-29T19:15:19Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Grandstream UCM Series IP PBX before firmware version 1.0.20.52 is affected by a parameter injection vulnerability in the HTTP interface. A remote and authenticated attacker can execute arbitrary code by sending a crafted HTTP request. Authentication may be possible using a default user and password. Affected models are the UCM6202, UCM6204, UCM6208, and UCM6510.\n",
  "id": "GHSA-jg72-rmmw-hp49",
  "modified": "2024-04-29T21:30:34Z",
  "published": "2024-04-29T21:30:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0840"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vulncheck.com/advisories/grand-stream-param-injection"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JR8P-XQ33-3425

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-11 12:00 – Updated: 2025-12-09 18:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.10). Affected devices do not properly validate the parameter of a specific GET request. This could allow an authenticated attacker to set the device to a denial of service state or to control the program counter and, thus, execute arbitrary code on the device.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-41665"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-141"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-10-11T11:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.10). Affected devices do not properly validate the parameter of a specific GET request. This could allow an authenticated attacker to set the device to a denial of service state or to control the program counter and, thus, execute arbitrary code on the device.",
  "id": "GHSA-jr8p-xq33-3425",
  "modified": "2025-12-09T18:30:28Z",
  "published": "2022-10-11T12:00:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41665"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-471761.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-572005.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-572005.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-QXQ3-P28M-QC36

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-21 00:01 – Updated: 2025-12-09 18:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00). Affected devices do not properly validate parameters of POST requests. This could allow an authenticated attacker to set the device to a denial of service state or to control the program counter and, thus, execute arbitrary code on the device.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-29872"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-141",
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-05-20T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00). Affected devices do not properly validate parameters of POST requests. This could allow an authenticated attacker to set the device to a denial of service state or to control the program counter and, thus, execute arbitrary code on the device.",
  "id": "GHSA-qxq3-p28m-qc36",
  "modified": "2025-12-09T18:30:25Z",
  "published": "2022-05-21T00:01:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-29872"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-165073.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-471761.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-165073.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V36V-C6XP-CPV3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-21 00:01 – Updated: 2025-12-09 18:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00). Affected devices do not properly validate parameters of certain GET and POST requests. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to set the device to a denial of service state or to control the program counter and, thus, execute arbitrary code on the device.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-29873"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-141"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-05-20T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions \u003c V3.00). Affected devices do not properly validate parameters of certain GET and POST requests. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to set the device to a denial of service state or to control the program counter and, thus, execute arbitrary code on the device.",
  "id": "GHSA-v36v-c6xp-cpv3",
  "modified": "2025-12-09T18:30:26Z",
  "published": "2022-05-21T00:01:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-29873"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-165073.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-471761.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-165073.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation

Developers should anticipate that parameter/argument delimiters will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system.

Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation MIT-28
Implementation

Strategy: Output Encoding

While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).

Mitigation MIT-20
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.

No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.