{"vulnerability": "CVE-2026-48579", "sightings": [{"uuid": "1240c608-6333-4c33-9bbb-be3b002e3bfb", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-48579", "type": "seen", "source": "https://infosec.exchange/users/vuldb/statuses/116694392154624808", "content": "A new vulnerability with increased severity was disclosed for Microsoft Exchange Online (CVE-2026-48579) https://vuldb.com/vuln/368417", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-04T23:18:35.125709Z"}, {"uuid": "be820d2f-ba58-4c98-b308-ff3dd3f1a9f7", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-48579", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/thehackerwire.bsky.social/post/3mnithjxzog2b", "content": "\ud83d\udd34 CVE-2026-48579 - Critical (9.1)\n\nImproper authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose i...\n\nhttps://www.thehackerwire.com/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48579/\n\n#infosec #cybersecurity #CVE #vulnerability #security #patchstack", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-05T00:00:59.817425Z"}, {"uuid": "be83fef1-6a1a-424c-9c8f-7a502d8ab473", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-48579", "type": "seen", "source": "https://infosec.exchange/users/vuldb/statuses/116697710954359032", "content": "It is possible to see elevated activities targeting Microsoft Exchange Online (CVE-2026-48579) https://vuldb.com/vuln/368417/cti", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-05T13:22:36.187718Z"}, {"uuid": "fcffbf76-fc5f-481a-ac14-d99748a0da44", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "86ecb4e1-bb32-44d5-9f39-8a4673af8385", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-48579", "type": "seen", "source": "https://advisories.ncsc.nl/advisory?id=NCSC-2026-0185", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-09T11:35:29.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "03801fb4-655b-438b-8a19-bc58501f2faa", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-48579", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/cyberhub.blog/post/3mnkq5qib5s2s", "content": "\ud83d\udccc CVE-2026-48579 - Improper authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. https://www.cyberhub.blog/cves/CVE-2026-48579", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-05T18:07:08.378197Z"}, {"uuid": "1838a5d6-9854-410e-a868-c88593456483", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-48579", "type": "seen", "source": "https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/6/9/the-june-2026-security-update-review", "content": "I\u2019ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I\u2019m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn\u2019t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let\u2019s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you\u2019d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check out the Patch Report webcast on our YouTube channel. It should be posted within a couple of hours after the release.\nAdobe Patches for June 2026\nFor May, June released 11 bulletins addressing 123 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, ColdFusion, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Forms, InDesign, InCopy, Substance 3D Sampler, Content Credentials SDK, Dreamweaver, Format Plugins, and Adobe Campaign Classic.\nHere\u2019s this month\u2019s overview table:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n  \n\n\n\n\n  \n    \n\n\n\n&lt;colgroup&gt;\n  &lt;col /&gt;\n  &lt;col /&gt;\n  &lt;col /&gt;\n  &lt;col /&gt;\n  &lt;col /&gt;\n  &lt;col /&gt;\n  &lt;col /&gt;\n&lt;/colgroup&gt;\n\n&lt;tfoot&gt;\n  \n&lt;/tfoot&gt;\n\n\n  \n    Bulletin ID\n    Product\n    CVE Count\n    Highest Severity\n    Highest CVSS\n    Exploited\n    Deployment Priority\n  \n\n\n  \n    APSB26-66\n    Adobe Campaign Classic\n    2\n    Critical\n    10.0\n    No\n    1\n  \n  \n    APSB26-64\n    Adobe ColdFusion\n    7\n    Critical\n    9.6\n    No\n    1\n  \n  \n    APSB26-63\n    Adobe Acrobat Reader\n    20\n    Critical\n    7.8\n    No\n    2\n  \n  \n    APSB26-57\n    Adobe Experience Manager Forms\n    3\n    Critical\n    9.3\n    No\n    2\n  \n  \n    APSB26-62\n    Adobe Dreamweaver\n    5\n    Critical\n    8.6\n    No\n    3\n  \n  \n    APSB26-65\n    Adobe Format Plugins\n    2\n    Critical\n    7.8\n    No\n    3\n  \n  \n    APSB26-59\n    Adobe InCopy\n    3\n    Critical\n    7.8\n    No\n    3\n  \n  \n    APSB26-58\n    Adobe InDesign\n    12\n    Critical\n    7.8\n    No\n    3\n  \n  \n    APSB26-60\n    Adobe Substance 3D Sampler\n    4\n    Critical\n    7.8\n    No\n    3\n  \n  \n    APSB26-61\n    Content Credentials SDK\n    8\n    Critical\n    7.5\n    No\n    3\n  \n  \n    APSB26-56\n    Adobe Experience Manager\n    57\n    Important\n    5.4\n    No\n    3\n  \n\n    TOTAL\n    11 bulletins\n    123\n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n\n  \nObviously, the update for Campaign Classic should be on the top of your deployment list if you\u2019re a user. A CVSS 10 is rare; two in the same bulletin is pretty much a unicorn. Adobe says there are no active attacks, but I would expect heavy research into creating one. The update for Coldfusion is also a Priority 1, but again, no known attacks is the wild. I suspect the Reader patch will also receive a lot of attention as malicious PDFs are common in ransomware attacks. The update for Experience Manager may be large, but it\u2019s mostly just cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs.\nMicrosoft Patches for June 2026\nThis month, Microsoft released a new record 208 CVEs Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Secure Boot, and BitLocker. At least, that\u2019s my count. Microsoft\u2019s tools seem to be having some issues, as they initially included a CVE from 2020 in this release. Regardless, the count is over 200, and I counted several times.\nOne of these bugs came through the ZDI program, but bugs submitted during Pwn2Own Berlin remain unpatched. If you include the Chromium and other third-party bugs, the total CVE count for June comes to a staggering 571 CVEs. 38 of these cases are rated Critical while the rest are rated Important in severity.\nI\u2019ve been counting CVEs on Patch Tuesday since 2017, and this is by far the largest monthly release in that time. The previous record was 177 set last year. It is extraordinary that Microsoft can produce so many patches in a single month, but it does raise concerns. How many of these cases were found using AI tools? How many patches were generated using AI to assist in coding or testing? What quality issues may exist in these patches? And likely most importantly, is this the new normal? The last two months were also large releases. Should sysadmins adjust their processes for prioritization and patch deployment based on this new volume of updates? Unfortunately, Microsoft is not providing those answers right now. Hopefully that changes in the future. BTW \u2013 just a note \u2013 the current number of CVEs shipped by Microsoft this year exceeds the total number of CVEs shipped in all of 2018.\nOne of the bugs patched by Microsoft this month is listed as under active exploitation and three others are listed as publicly known at the time of release. Let\u2019s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bug being exploited in the wild.\n-&nbsp;&nbsp; CVE-2026-41091 - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege VulnerabilitySince Microsoft doesn\u2019t provide info on how widespread exploitation is, we must read some tea leaves. For this patch, several different people were acknowledged, which indicates multiple parties say this is in the wild, meaning exploitation is likely significant. The good news is that most people won\u2019t need to take action as Defender updates itself. However, if you don\u2019t have this configured or are in an isolated environment, you\u2019ll need to update to the latest version.\n-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; CVE-2026-45657 - Windows Kernel Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityThis CVSS 9.8 bug allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code at SYSTEM level without user interaction. Yup \u2013 this is wormable. The problem lies in the way the kernel handles TCP/IP. This was listed as \u201cExploitation Less Likely\u201d by Microsoft, but rest assured that every researcher and bug shop on the planet is reversing this patch right now trying to create an exploit. Test and deploy this patch quickly.\n-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;CVE-2026-47291 - HTTP.sys Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityOur second CVSS 9.8 bug of the month, this also allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code on affected systems without user interaction. However, there is a caveat. Systems using the default MaxRequestBytes registry value used by the Windows HTTP stack are not affected by this bug. You can edit your registry settings if you need protection while you test and deploy the patch. The bulletin includes instructions and even a PowerShell script for doing this action. Microsoft lists this as \u201cExploitation more likely\u201d, so I would definitely check your registry settings.\n-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;CVE-2026-44815 - DHCP Client Service Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityHere\u2019s another CVSS 9.8 that has an odd incongruity. Although the CVSS says no permissions are required for exploitation, the write-up states it must be an \u201cauthenticated\u201d user. I would err on the side of caution here and believe the CVSS. If that\u2019s correct, then we have another bug where a remote, unauthenticated attacker could execute code on affected systems without user interaction. And since the DHCP client is on every OS, it\u2019s a juicy target. This is another one to test and deploy with haste.\n-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;CVE-2026-45585/CVE-2026-50507 - Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass VulnerabilityIf you\u2019ve followed the ongoing saga of Nightmare Eclipse vs. MSRC, the bugs should look familiar. One is definitely a fix for \u201cYellowKey\u201d, while the other appears to be a fix for \u201cGreenPlasma\u201d. The researcher has promised a \u201cbone shattering\u201d drop on June 14, so let\u2019s hope Microsoft is able to reach some understanding with the researcher before more 0-days are released. Also, there is a script provided by Microsoft as a mitigation, but the better strategy is to test and deploy the updates.\n&nbsp;Here\u2019s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for June 2026:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n  \n\n\n\n\n  \n    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n &lt;col width=\"144\" /&gt;\n &lt;col width=\"256\" /&gt;\n &lt;col span=\"6\" width=\"104\" /&gt;\n \n\n  CVE\n  Title\n  Severity\n  CVSS\n  Public\n  Exploited\n  XI\n  Type\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-41091&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Defender\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  Yes\n  Yes\n  0\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-49160&lt;/span&gt;\n  HTTP.sys Denial of\n  Service Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.5\n  Yes\n  No\n  1\n  DoS\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-50507&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows BitLocker\n  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  6.8\n  Yes\n  No\n  1\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45586&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Collaborative\n  Translation Framework (CTFMON) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  Yes\n  No\n  1\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2025-10263 *&lt;/span&gt;\n  ARM: CVE-2025-10263\n  Completion of affected memory accesses might not be guaranteed by completion\n  of a TLBI [kernel]\n  Critical\n  9.3\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48567&lt;/span&gt;\n  Azure HorizonDB&lt;span&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  10\n  No\n  No\n  N/A\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-32193&lt;/span&gt;\n  Azure Kubernetes\n  Service (AKS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47644&lt;/span&gt;\n  Copilot Chat\n  (Microsoft Edge) Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  6.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44815&lt;/span&gt;\n  DHCP Client Service\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  9.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47291&lt;/span&gt;\n  HTTP.sys Remote Code\n  Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  9.8\n  No\n  No\n  1\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42824&lt;/span&gt;\n  M365 Copilot\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  6.5\n  No\n  No\n  N/A\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45476&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Azure\n  Network Adapter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.2\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44810&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft\n  Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48579&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Exchange\n  Online Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  9.1\n  No\n  No\n  N/A\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47655&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Graph\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  6.5\n  No\n  No\n  N/A\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45497&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft M365 Copilot\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  7.7\n  No\n  No\n  N/A\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45460&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  4.7\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45472&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45474&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45461&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45463&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45456&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Outlook and\n  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45458&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Outlook and\n  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47635&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Outlook and\n  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-26142&lt;/span&gt;\n  Nuance PowerScribe\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  9.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47289&lt;/span&gt;\n  Remote Desktop Client\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47654&lt;/span&gt;\n  Remote Desktop Client\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48563&lt;/span&gt;\n  Remote Desktop Client\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42992&lt;/span&gt;\n  Remote Desktop Client\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44799&lt;/span&gt;\n  Remote Desktop Client\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44801&lt;/span&gt;\n  Remote Desktop Client\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42985&lt;/span&gt;\n  Remote Desktop Client\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.8\n  No\n  No\n  1\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45648&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Active\n  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42987&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Deployment\n  Services (WDS) Remote Code Execution\n  Critical\n  8.1\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-33828&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Device Health\n  Attestation (DHA) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44803&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Graphics\n  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  1\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44812&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Graphics\n  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  1\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45607&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Hyper-V Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45641&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Hyper-V Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47652&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Hyper-V Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  8.2\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47288&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Kerberos Key\n  Distribution Center (KDC) Remote Code Execution\n  Critical\n  7.1\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45657&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Kernel Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  9.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48574&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Media Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Critical\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45490&lt;/span&gt;\n  .NET SDK Elevation of\n  Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45491&lt;/span&gt;\n  .NET Tampering\n  Vulnerability\n  Important\n  6.2\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  Tampering\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45591&lt;/span&gt;\n  ASP.NET Core Denial of\n  Service Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  DoS\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47643&lt;/span&gt;\n  Azure Stack Edge\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  9.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-41098&lt;/span&gt;\n  Azure Stack Edge\n  Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45642&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Azure\n  Attestation service and Device Health Attestation Service Spoofing\n  Vulnerability\n  Important\n  3.9\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45650&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Bing Search\n  Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  4.3\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45637&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft DWM Core\n  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45647&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Defender for\n  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-40371&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Dynamics 365\n  (on-premises) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44822&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Excel\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.2\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45455&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Excel\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  3.3\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45469&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Excel Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44817&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Excel Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44818&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Excel Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44820&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Excel Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44823&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Excel Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45459&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Excel\n  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  3.3\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45504&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Exchange\n  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45502&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Exchange\n  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45503&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Exchange\n  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.1\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45583&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Exchange\n  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45500&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Exchange\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  6.1\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45501&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Exchange\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  6.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47631&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Exchange\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.1\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42986&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Graphics\n  Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  1\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-41092&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Kinect\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45644&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Live Share\n  Canvas SDK Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47293&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45485&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  3.3\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44821&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45483&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Project Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  4.6\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45475&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44819&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44824&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45645&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Office\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-49161&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft PC Manager\n  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42902&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft PowerToys\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45484&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45454&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  6.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47298&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45467&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  4.6\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45468&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  4.6\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45479&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  4.6\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45453&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47636&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47637&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  4.6\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47638&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  4.6\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47639&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.4\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47641&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  4.6\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-33113&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45462&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  4.6\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45464&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45465&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47634&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.3\n  No\n  No\n  1\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47640&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  4.6\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45481&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.3\n  No\n  No\n  1\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48560&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48562&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft SharePoint\n  Server Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  4.6\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42835&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Teams for\n  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.1\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45606&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft UxTheme\n  Library (uxtheme.dll) Denial of Service Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  DoS\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45482&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Visual\n  Studio Code CoPilot Chat Extension Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45466&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Word\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  3.3\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45471&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Word Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45486&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Word Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45643&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Word Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45457&lt;/span&gt;\n  Microsoft Word Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42980&lt;/span&gt;\n  NT OS Kernel Elevation\n  of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  1\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42916&lt;/span&gt;\n  NT OS Kernel Elevation\n  of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45649&lt;/span&gt;\n  Office for Android\n  Spoofing Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.1\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47653&lt;/span&gt;\n  Remote Desktop Client\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42909&lt;/span&gt;\n  Remote Desktop Client\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42913&lt;/span&gt;\n  Remote Desktop Client\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42993&lt;/span&gt;\n  Remote Desktop Client\n  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45588&lt;/span&gt;\n  Secure Boot Security\n  Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.9\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48568&lt;/span&gt;\n  Secure Boot Security\n  Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.9\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48570&lt;/span&gt;\n  Secure Boot Security\n  Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.9\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48573&lt;/span&gt;\n  Secure Boot Security\n  Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.9\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48575&lt;/span&gt;\n  Secure Boot Security\n  Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.9\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48576&lt;/span&gt;\n  Secure Boot Security\n  Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.9\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48578&lt;/span&gt;\n  Secure Boot Security\n  Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.9\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45654&lt;/span&gt;\n  Secure Boot Security\n  Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.9\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45656&lt;/span&gt;\n  UEFI Secure Boot\n  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-8863&lt;/span&gt;\n  UEFI Secure Boot\n  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-40376&lt;/span&gt;\n  Visual Studio Code\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47281&lt;/span&gt;\n  Visual Studio Code\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  9.6\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47284&lt;/span&gt;\n  Visual Studio Code\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  6.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47292&lt;/span&gt;\n  Visual Studio Code\n  MSSQL Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48569&lt;/span&gt;\n  Visual Studio Code\n  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.1\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47287&lt;/span&gt;\n  Visual Studio Code\n  Tampering Vulnerability\n  Important\n  6.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Tampering\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42829&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Administrator\n  Protection Secure Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  \n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-34335&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Ancillary\n  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45601&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Ancillary\n  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45598&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Ancillary\n  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45596&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Ancillary\n  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45638&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Ancillary\n  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45603&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Ancillary\n  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42911&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Ancillary\n  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45594&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Application\n  Identity (AppID) Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45655&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows BitLocker\n  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.3\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45658&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows BitLocker\n  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  1\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45640&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Bluetooth Port\n  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45605&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Bluetooth\n  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47656&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Boot Manager\n  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.9\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44809&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Common Log\n  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45634&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DHCP Client\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45608&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DHCP Client\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  6.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-41108&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DNS Client\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42905&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DWM Core\n  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  1\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44811&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DWM Core\n  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44808&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DWM Core\n  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44807&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DWM Core\n  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42983&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DWM Core\n  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44802&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DWM Core\n  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44813&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DWM Core\n  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44804&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DWM Core\n  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48566&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DWM Core\n  Library Information Disclosure&lt;span&gt; \n  &lt;/span&gt;Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44814&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows DWM Core\n  Library Information Disclosure&lt;span&gt; \n  &lt;/span&gt;Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45602&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Dynamic Host\n  Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Tampering Vulnerability\n  Important\n  9.1\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Tampering\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42836&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Function\n  Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42910&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Hotpatch\n  Monitoring Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42972&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Hyper-V\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45592&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Internet\n  (wininet.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42903&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Kerberos\n  Denial of Service Vulnerability\n  Important\n  6.5\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  DoS\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42914&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Kerberos\n  Denial of Service Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.3\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  DoS\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48583&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Kernel\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45653&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Kernel\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42984&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Kernel\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45600&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Kernel-Mode\n  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45604&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Managed\n  Installer Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45595&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Mark of the\n  Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.4\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  SFB\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45636&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows NTFS Remote\n  Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-50508&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows NTLM Spoofing\n  Vulnerability\n  Important\n  6.5\n  No\n  No\n  1\n  Spoofing\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-48565&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Narrator\n  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-44805&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Network\n  Controller (NC) Host Agent Denial of Service Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  DoS\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42981&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Performance\n  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.1\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42974&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Performance\n  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.1\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45487&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Program\n  Compatibility Assistant Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42828&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Projected File\n  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42837&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Projected File\n  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42969&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Push\n  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42971&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Push\n  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42970&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Push\n  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42973&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Push\n  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42978&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Push\n  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42977&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Push\n  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42979&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Push\n  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42991&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Push\n  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45639&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Remote Desktop\n  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42908&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Remote Desktop\n  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45593&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows SDK Elevation\n  of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42906&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Shell\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42907&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Shell\n  Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  6.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-47648&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Storage\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42915&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows TCP/IP Denial\n  of Service Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.7\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  DoS\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42904&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows TCP/IP\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  9.6\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42968&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Telephony\n  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n  Important\n  5.5\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  Info\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42912&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Telephony\n  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45597&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows UI Automation\n  Manager (uiamanager.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7\n  No\n  No\n  3\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45599&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows UPnP Device\n  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.1\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-45635&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows UPnP Device\n  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n  Important\n  8.1\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  RCE\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-40409&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Universal Disk\n  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-40404&lt;/span&gt;\n  Windows Universal Disk\n  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  2\n  EoP\n \n \n  &lt;span&gt;CVE-2026-42989&lt;/span&gt;\n  Winlogon\n  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n  Important\n  7.8\n  No\n  No\n  1\n  EoP\n \n \n \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n\n  \n* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases.\n\u2020 Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.\n&nbsp;\nLooking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this release, the scariest-looking one is actually nothing to concern yourself with at all. The CVSS 10 bug in Azure HorizonDB has already been addressed by Microsoft and is just being documented now. That\u2019s also the case for five others. Of course, there wouldn\u2019t be a release without Office bugs that have the Preview Pane as an attack vector. There are multiple in June. There\u2019s a handful of bugs in the Remote Desktop Client, but these rely on connecting to a malicious RDP server. There are three patches for Hyper-V that allow for guest-to-host code execution. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication, but any authenticated user can hit it. For the Windows Directory Service vulnerability, it needs to be listening for TFTP. You have blocked that everywhere, right? The bug in Azure Network Adapter is somewhat unique as you need to update your Linux kernel to be protected. The bug in Azure Kubernetes allows an attacker to break out of a container and gain control of the AKS worker node. Finally, the bug in the Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) seems unlikely, but if exploited, it could allow authenticated attackers to get code execution on affected systems.\nMoving on to the other code execution bugs, there are the ubiquitous open-an-own bugs in Office components like Excel and Word. The code injection bug in Exchange Server looks troubling, but it requires a machine-in-the-middle (MiTM), so exploitation is unlikely. The bugs in SharePoint require authentication, but you should note that the patch applies to both SharePoint Server 2016 and SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016. The two bugs in UPnP are interesting. Both can lead to code execution by causing an error during the handling of specially crafted data, which could lead to a Use After Free (UAF) bug. The bugs in RDP Client all require connecting to a malicious RDP server, but it\u2019s not clear why some are rated Critical and some are rated Important. The NTFS vulnerability requires a user to mount a virtual hard drive on an affected system. The last RCE bug this month is in Azure Stack Edge and requires the attacker to send a specially crafted file upload request that includes a manipulated file name or path, leading to code execution.\nThere are more than 60 Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs in this month\u2019s release, and as usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there\u2019s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. A notable exception is in Exchange Server, where a user on Outlook Web Access (OWA) could gain access to other mailboxes. The bug in Visual Studio Code could allow attackers to gain permissions associated with the MCP Server\u2019s managed identity. The bugs in Windows SDK and Windows UI Automation Manager could let attacker go from low integrity up to medium integrity code execution. The bug in Bluetooth just allows \u201celevated\u201d privileges without really describing what elevated might be. \nMoving on to the more than 20 security feature bypass (SFB) bugs in the June release, there are a total of 10 that impact Secure Boot. All carry scope change (S:C) in the CVSS, meaning successful exploitation affects security boundaries beyond the vulnerable component itself \u2014 specifically the ability to load untrusted code at boot, bypass Virtual Secure Mode, and undermine boot integrity guarantees. CVE-2026-45654 explicitly calls out VSM exposure. The bulk of these are credited to Alon Leviev (STORM), which is notable given his prior BootKitty/BlackLotus-adjacent research. The bugs in the Windows Boot Manager have a similar impact as the Secure Boot bugs. The UEFI Secure Boot vulnerabilities go a layer deeper. They require either local admin or physical access but could allow for the running of untrusted code even before the OS loads. Rootkits anyone? The four bugs in BitLocker all require physical access but could yield encrypted data if exploited. The bug in Windows Administration Protection allows attackers to bypass the feature that prevents standard-user apps from performing admin-level actions. The bug in Visual Studio Copilot Chat could be the most interesting non-boot bug here as it allows authentication impersonation. Mark of the Web (MotW) and Excel vulns could bypass user warnings. Lastly, the bug in PC Manager bypasses expected user controls. \nTurning our attention to the mass of spoofing bugs in the release, we instantly see 18 impacting SharePoint Server. Fortunately, these are simply cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. It\u2019s the Exchange bugs we should really watch for. One is an XSS that an attacker can exploit by convincing an Exchange administrator to open a malicious link or message, which then runs code in the admin's web session. That's a meaningful privilege escalation path. Another is listed as an SSRF-based attack, but no other details are available. The last is a lower-impact XSS with limited confidentiality/integrity loss. The bug in Bing Search (remember Bing?) is a classic search result spoofing. The bug in Azure Stack Edge is interesting as it could allow access to resources outside the vulnerable component's security boundary. The bug in Office for Android requires user interaction. The Office Project Server bug is an authenticated XSS with low impact. The final spoofing bug is in Azure Attestation but has already been addressed. You should still verify you are protected by following the instructions in the write-up from Microsoft.\nThere are 30 different information disclosure bugs in this release, and fortunately, the vast majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The two bugs in Visual Studio require user interaction and could \u201cdisclose information over a network.\u201d How obtuse. The bug in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code could disclose discloses a sign-in access token for a user's work account. That's a meaningful credential exposure, not just random memory. That leaves the two bugs in Exchange Server. One could allow an authenticated user to gain information about which network services that the Exchange server can reach. The other sounds much like the spoofing bug in OWA as it allows attackers to see information in mailboxes they should not have access to.\nI\u2019ve never been a fan of the \u201ctampering\u201d category, as it could mean so many different things. For example, the bug in .NET simply says it could allow an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally. Similarly, the bug in Visual Studio says the same, expect here the tampering occurs over a network. Microsoft doesn\u2019t even bother with a CWE for the tampering bug in the DHCP Server, so your guess is as good as mine.\nThere are seven DoS bugs in the June release, and as usual, Microsoft provides little to no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. The most interesting is the bug in HTTP.sys, which is listed as publicly known. This is an uncontrolled resource consumption, rated \"Exploitation More Likely,\" and publicly disclosed. Since, HTTP.sys sits at the core of IIS and Windows web services, a network-accessible DoS here can take down any Windows server running HTTP-based services. Based on the Acknowledgement, it looks like this bug may have been found using AI. There are no real details for the other bugs, but based simply on the impact, I would focus on the Kerberos and TCP/IP bugs if you had to prioritize.\nNo new advisories are being released this month.\nLooking Ahead\nThe next Patch Tuesday will be on July 14 and will be the last one before Black Hat/DEFCON. It\u2019s usually a big release, so strap in and hang on. I\u2019ll be back then to give you my full thoughts. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!\n&nbsp;", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-09T16:12:18.000000Z"}]}