https://vulnerability.circl.lu Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Sun, 11 Oct 2026 13:58:15 +0000 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-8916 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC Java, Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BCPKIX FIPS, Siemens SIMATIC CN 4100</p> <p>Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC Java bcpkix on All (API modules), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC Java bcprov on All (API modules), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BCPKIX FIPS bcpkix-fips on All (API modules) allows Excessive Allocation. This vulnerability is associated with program files https://github.Com/bcgit/bc-java/blob/main/pkix/src/main/java/org/bouncycastle/pkix/jcajce/PKIXCertPathReviewer.Java, https://github.Com/bcgit/bc-java/blob/main/prov/src/main/java/org/bouncycastle/x509/PKIXCertPathReviewer.Java.</p> <p>This issue affects BC Java: from 1.44 through 1.78; BC Java: from 1.44 through 1.78; BCPKIX FIPS: from 1.0.0 through 1.0.7, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.7.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC Java, Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BCPKIX FIPS, Siemens SIMATIC CN 4100</p> <p>Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC Java bcpkix on All (API modules), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC Java bcprov on All (API modules), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BCPKIX FIPS bcpkix-fips on All (API modules) allows Excessive Allocation. This vulnerability is associated with program files https://github.Com/bcgit/bc-java/blob/main/pkix/src/main/java/org/bouncycastle/pkix/jcajce/PKIXCertPathReviewer.Java, https://github.Com/bcgit/bc-java/blob/main/prov/src/main/java/org/bouncycastle/x509/PKIXCertPathReviewer.Java.</p> <p>This issue affects BC Java: from 1.44 through 1.78; BC Java: from 1.44 through 1.78; BCPKIX FIPS: from 1.0.0 through 1.0.7, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.7.</p> https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-8916 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/usn-8108-1 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS: bouncycastle</p> <p>It was discovered that Bouncy Castle did not sanitize user input when inserting it into an LDAP search filter. An attacker could possibly use this issue to perform an LDAP injection attack. This issue only affected Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. (CVE-2023-33201)</p> <p>It was discovered that Bouncy Castle incorrectly handled specially crafted F2m parameters in the ECCurve algorithm. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bouncy Castle to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-29857)</p> <p>It was discovered that Bouncy Castle leaked timing information when handling exceptions during an RSA handshake. An attacker could possibly use this issue to obtain sensitive information. This issue only affected Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-30171)</p> <p>It was discovered that Bouncy Castle incorrectly handled endpoint identification with an SSL socket enabled without an explicit hostname. An attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a DNS poisoning attack. This issue only affected Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-34447)</p> <p>Bing Shi discovered that Bouncy Castle incorrectly handled resource memory allocation. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bouncy Castle to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of serv…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS: bouncycastle</p> <p>It was discovered that Bouncy Castle did not sanitize user input when inserting it into an LDAP search filter. An attacker could possibly use this issue to perform an LDAP injection attack. This issue only affected Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. (CVE-2023-33201)</p> <p>It was discovered that Bouncy Castle incorrectly handled specially crafted F2m parameters in the ECCurve algorithm. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bouncy Castle to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-29857)</p> <p>It was discovered that Bouncy Castle leaked timing information when handling exceptions during an RSA handshake. An attacker could possibly use this issue to obtain sensitive information. This issue only affected Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-30171)</p> <p>It was discovered that Bouncy Castle incorrectly handled endpoint identification with an SSL socket enabled without an explicit hostname. An attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a DNS poisoning attack. This issue only affected Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-34447)</p> <p>Bing Shi discovered that Bouncy Castle incorrectly handled resource memory allocation. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bouncy Castle to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of serv…</p> https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/usn-8108-1