<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 03:53:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2022-48675 — IB/core: Fix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-48675</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IB/core: Fix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow by using mmput_async().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From the below call trace [1] can see that calling mmput() once we have
the umem_odp-&amp;gt;umem_mutex locked as required by
ib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock() might trigger in the same task the
exit_mmap()-&amp;gt;__mmu_notifier_release()-&amp;gt;mlx5_ib_invalidate_range() which
may dead lock when trying to lock the same mutex.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moving to use mmput_async() will solve the problem as the above
exit_mmap() flow will be called in other task and will be executed once
the lock will be available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1]
[64843.077665] task:kworker/u133:2  state:D stack:    0 pid:80906 ppid:
2 flags:0x00004000
[64843.077672] Workqueue: mlx5_ib_page_fault mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action [mlx5_ib]
[64843.077719] Call Trace:
[64843.077722]  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
[64843.077724]  __schedule+0x23d/0x590
[64843.077729]  schedule+0x4e/0xb0
[64843.077735]  schedule_preempt_disabled+0xe/0x10
[64843.077740]  __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x263/0x490
[64843.077747]  __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x13/0x20
[64843.077752]  mutex_lock+0x34/0x40
[64843.077758]  mlx5_ib_invalidate_range+0x48/0x270 [mlx5_ib]
[64843.077808]  __mmu_notifier_release+0x1a4/0x200
[64843.077816]  exit_mmap+0x1bc/0x200
[64843.077822]  ? walk_page_range+0x9c/0x120
[64843.077828]  ? __cond_resched+0x1a/0x50
[64843.077833]  ? mutex_lock+0x13/0x40
[64843.077839]  ? uprobe_clear_state+0xac/0x120
[64843.077860]  mmput+0x5…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IB/core: Fix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow by using mmput_async().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From the below call trace [1] can see that calling mmput() once we have
the umem_odp-&amp;gt;umem_mutex locked as required by
ib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock() might trigger in the same task the
exit_mmap()-&amp;gt;__mmu_notifier_release()-&amp;gt;mlx5_ib_invalidate_range() which
may dead lock when trying to lock the same mutex.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moving to use mmput_async() will solve the problem as the above
exit_mmap() flow will be called in other task and will be executed once
the lock will be available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1]
[64843.077665] task:kworker/u133:2  state:D stack:    0 pid:80906 ppid:
2 flags:0x00004000
[64843.077672] Workqueue: mlx5_ib_page_fault mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action [mlx5_ib]
[64843.077719] Call Trace:
[64843.077722]  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
[64843.077724]  __schedule+0x23d/0x590
[64843.077729]  schedule+0x4e/0xb0
[64843.077735]  schedule_preempt_disabled+0xe/0x10
[64843.077740]  __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x263/0x490
[64843.077747]  __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x13/0x20
[64843.077752]  mutex_lock+0x34/0x40
[64843.077758]  mlx5_ib_invalidate_range+0x48/0x270 [mlx5_ib]
[64843.077808]  __mmu_notifier_release+0x1a4/0x200
[64843.077816]  exit_mmap+0x1bc/0x200
[64843.077822]  ? walk_page_range+0x9c/0x120
[64843.077828]  ? __cond_resched+0x1a/0x50
[64843.077833]  ? mutex_lock+0x13/0x40
[64843.077839]  ? uprobe_clear_state+0xac/0x120
[64843.077860]  mmput+0x5…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-48675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
