<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 17:13:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2021-47391 — RDMA/cma: Ensure rdma_addr_cancel() happens before issuing more requests</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2021-47391</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RDMA/cma: Ensure rdma_addr_cancel() happens before issuing more requests&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FSM can run in a circle allowing rdma_resolve_ip() to be called twice
on the same id_priv. While this cannot happen without going through the
work, it violates the invariant that the same address resolution
background request cannot be active twice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU 1                                  CPU 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rdma_resolve_addr():
  RDMA_CM_IDLE -&amp;gt; RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY
  rdma_resolve_ip(addr_handler)  #1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;process_one_req(): for #1
                          addr_handler():
                            RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY -&amp;gt; RDMA_CM_ADDR_BOUND
                            mutex_unlock(&amp;amp;id_priv-&amp;gt;handler_mutex);
                            [.. handler still running ..]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rdma_resolve_addr():
  RDMA_CM_ADDR_BOUND -&amp;gt; RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY
  rdma_resolve_ip(addr_handler)
    !! two requests are now on the req_list&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rdma_destroy_id():
 destroy_id_handler_unlock():
  _destroy_id():
   cma_cancel_operation():
    rdma_addr_cancel()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;// process_one_req() self removes it
		          spin_lock_bh(&amp;amp;lock);
                           cancel_delayed_work(&amp;amp;req-&amp;gt;work);
	                   if (!list_empty(&amp;amp;req-&amp;gt;list)) == true&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;! rdma_addr_cancel() returns after process_on_req #1 is done&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kfree(id_priv)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;process_one_req(): for #2
                          addr_handler():
	                    mutex_lock(&amp;amp;id_priv-&amp;gt;handler_mutex…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RDMA/cma: Ensure rdma_addr_cancel() happens before issuing more requests&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FSM can run in a circle allowing rdma_resolve_ip() to be called twice
on the same id_priv. While this cannot happen without going through the
work, it violates the invariant that the same address resolution
background request cannot be active twice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU 1                                  CPU 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rdma_resolve_addr():
  RDMA_CM_IDLE -&amp;gt; RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY
  rdma_resolve_ip(addr_handler)  #1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;process_one_req(): for #1
                          addr_handler():
                            RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY -&amp;gt; RDMA_CM_ADDR_BOUND
                            mutex_unlock(&amp;amp;id_priv-&amp;gt;handler_mutex);
                            [.. handler still running ..]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rdma_resolve_addr():
  RDMA_CM_ADDR_BOUND -&amp;gt; RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY
  rdma_resolve_ip(addr_handler)
    !! two requests are now on the req_list&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rdma_destroy_id():
 destroy_id_handler_unlock():
  _destroy_id():
   cma_cancel_operation():
    rdma_addr_cancel()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;// process_one_req() self removes it
		          spin_lock_bh(&amp;amp;lock);
                           cancel_delayed_work(&amp;amp;req-&amp;gt;work);
	                   if (!list_empty(&amp;amp;req-&amp;gt;list)) == true&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;! rdma_addr_cancel() returns after process_on_req #1 is done&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kfree(id_priv)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;process_one_req(): for #2
                          addr_handler():
	                    mutex_lock(&amp;amp;id_priv-&amp;gt;handler_mutex…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2021-47391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
