<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:18:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-93165 — platform/chrome: sensorhub: Fix memory overread in ring handler</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-93165</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;platform/chrome: sensorhub: Fix memory overread in ring handler&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`max_response` and `sensor_num` are read from different EC commands:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- `max_response` is from cros_ec_get_proto_info().
    ec_dev-&amp;gt;max_response = info-&amp;gt;max_response_packet_size -
                                    sizeof(struct ec_host_response);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- `sensor_num` is from cros_ec_get_sensor_count().
    sensor_num = cros_ec_get_sensor_count(ec);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With a malfunctioning EC firmware, it is possible that the `msg-&amp;gt;insize`
(i.e., `fifo_info_length` in the context) could be clamped in
cros_ec_cmd_xfer() because `msg-&amp;gt;insize` is greater than `max_response`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;int fifo_info_length =
            sizeof(struct ec_response_motion_sense_fifo_info) +
            sizeof(u16) * sensorhub-&amp;gt;sensor_num;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This means the number of read bytes could be less than expected.  As a
result, the subsequent memcpy() in cros_ec_sensorhub_ring_handler()
overreads the `resp-&amp;gt;fifo_info` buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check the return value of cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() and abort if the
number of bytes read does not match the expected length.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;platform/chrome: sensorhub: Fix memory overread in ring handler&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`max_response` and `sensor_num` are read from different EC commands:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- `max_response` is from cros_ec_get_proto_info().
    ec_dev-&amp;gt;max_response = info-&amp;gt;max_response_packet_size -
                                    sizeof(struct ec_host_response);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- `sensor_num` is from cros_ec_get_sensor_count().
    sensor_num = cros_ec_get_sensor_count(ec);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With a malfunctioning EC firmware, it is possible that the `msg-&amp;gt;insize`
(i.e., `fifo_info_length` in the context) could be clamped in
cros_ec_cmd_xfer() because `msg-&amp;gt;insize` is greater than `max_response`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;int fifo_info_length =
            sizeof(struct ec_response_motion_sense_fifo_info) +
            sizeof(u16) * sensorhub-&amp;gt;sensor_num;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This means the number of read bytes could be less than expected.  As a
result, the subsequent memcpy() in cros_ec_sensorhub_ring_handler()
overreads the `resp-&amp;gt;fifo_info` buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check the return value of cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() and abort if the
number of bytes read does not match the expected length.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-93165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
