<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 13:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825</link>
      <description>CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-15732</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bdu:2025-15732</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-15732</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bdu:2025-15732</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-39685</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39685</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39685</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-39685</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39685</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;comedi: pcl726: Prevent invalid irq number&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reproducer passed in an irq number(0x80008000) that was too large,
which triggered the oob.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Added an interrupt number check to prevent users from passing in an irq
number that was too large.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If `it-&amp;gt;options[1]` is 31, then `1 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; it-&amp;gt;options[1]` is still invalid
because it shifts a 1-bit into the sign bit (which is UB in C).
Possible solutions include reducing the upper bound on the
`it-&amp;gt;options[1]` value to 30 or lower, or using `1U &amp;lt;&amp;lt; it-&amp;gt;options[1]`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The old code would just not attempt to request the IRQ if the
`options[1]` value were invalid.  And it would still configure the
device without interrupts even if the call to `request_irq` returned an
error.  So it would be better to combine this test with the test below.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;comedi: pcl726: Prevent invalid irq number&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reproducer passed in an irq number(0x80008000) that was too large,
which triggered the oob.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Added an interrupt number check to prevent users from passing in an irq
number that was too large.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If `it-&amp;gt;options[1]` is 31, then `1 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; it-&amp;gt;options[1]` is still invalid
because it shifts a 1-bit into the sign bit (which is UB in C).
Possible solutions include reducing the upper bound on the
`it-&amp;gt;options[1]` value to 30 or lower, or using `1U &amp;lt;&amp;lt; it-&amp;gt;options[1]`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The old code would just not attempt to request the IRQ if the
`options[1]` value were invalid.  And it would still configure the
device without interrupts even if the call to `request_irq` returned an
error.  So it would be better to combine this test with the test below.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39685</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-jx84-vrfm-c347</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-jx84-vrfm-c347</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;comedi: pcl726: Prevent invalid irq number&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reproducer passed in an irq number(0x80008000) that was too large,
which triggered the oob.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Added an interrupt number check to prevent users from passing in an irq
number that was too large.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If `it-&amp;gt;options[1]` is 31, then `1 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; it-&amp;gt;options[1]` is still invalid
because it shifts a 1-bit into the sign bit (which is UB in C).
Possible solutions include reducing the upper bound on the
`it-&amp;gt;options[1]` value to 30 or lower, or using `1U &amp;lt;&amp;lt; it-&amp;gt;options[1]`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The old code would just not attempt to request the IRQ if the
`options[1]` value were invalid.  And it would still configure the
device without interrupts even if the call to `request_irq` returned an
error.  So it would be better to combine this test with the test below.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;comedi: pcl726: Prevent invalid irq number&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reproducer passed in an irq number(0x80008000) that was too large,
which triggered the oob.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Added an interrupt number check to prevent users from passing in an irq
number that was too large.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If `it-&amp;gt;options[1]` is 31, then `1 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; it-&amp;gt;options[1]` is still invalid
because it shifts a 1-bit into the sign bit (which is UB in C).
Possible solutions include reducing the upper bound on the
`it-&amp;gt;options[1]` value to 30 or lower, or using `1U &amp;lt;&amp;lt; it-&amp;gt;options[1]`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The old code would just not attempt to request the IRQ if the
`options[1]` value were invalid.  And it would still configure the
device without interrupts even if the call to `request_irq` returned an
error.  So it would be better to combine this test with the test below.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-jx84-vrfm-c347</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICSA-26-134-10 — Siemens SIMATIC</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/icsa-26-134-10</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/icsa-26-134-10</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2025-39685 — comedi: pcl726: Prevent invalid irq number</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-39685</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2025-39685</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-39685</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NCSC-2026-0147 — Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</link>
      <description>NCSC-2026-0147</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-2633 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/oesa-2025-2633</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:x86/microcode/AMD: Fix out-of-bounds on systems with CPU-less NUMA nodesCurrently, load_microcode_amd() iterates over all NUMA nodes, retrieves theirCPU masks and unconditionally accesses per-CPU data for the first CPU of eachmask.According to Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst:   Some memory may share the same node as a CPU, and others are provided as  memory only nodes. Therefore, some node CPU masks may be empty and wouldn t have a  first CPU .On a machine with far memory (and therefore CPU-less NUMA nodes):- cpumask_of_node(nid) is 0- cpumask_first(0) is CONFIG_NR_CPUS- cpu_data(CONFIG_NR_CPUS) accesses the cpu_info per-CPU array at an  index that is 1 out of boundsThis does not have any security implications since flashing microcode isa privileged operation but I believe this has reliability implications bypotentially corrupting memory while flashing a microcode update.When booting with CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS=y on an AMD machine that flashesa microcode update. I get the following splat:  UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c:X:Y  index 512 is out of range for type  unsigned long[512]   [...]  Call Trace:   dump_stack   __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds   load_microcode_amd   request_microcode_amd   reload_store   kernfs_fop_write_iter   vfs_write   ksys_write   do_syscall_64   entry_SYSCALL_64_after…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:x86/microcode/AMD: Fix out-of-bounds on systems with CPU-less NUMA nodesCurrently, load_microcode_amd() iterates over all NUMA nodes, retrieves theirCPU masks and unconditionally accesses per-CPU data for the first CPU of eachmask.According to Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst:   Some memory may share the same node as a CPU, and others are provided as  memory only nodes. Therefore, some node CPU masks may be empty and wouldn t have a  first CPU .On a machine with far memory (and therefore CPU-less NUMA nodes):- cpumask_of_node(nid) is 0- cpumask_first(0) is CONFIG_NR_CPUS- cpu_data(CONFIG_NR_CPUS) accesses the cpu_info per-CPU array at an  index that is 1 out of boundsThis does not have any security implications since flashing microcode isa privileged operation but I believe this has reliability implications bypotentially corrupting memory while flashing a microcode update.When booting with CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS=y on an AMD machine that flashesa microcode update. I get the following splat:  UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c:X:Y  index 512 is out of range for type  unsigned long[512]   [...]  Call Trace:   dump_stack   __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds   load_microcode_amd   request_microcode_amd   reload_store   kernfs_fop_write_iter   vfs_write   ksys_write   do_syscall_64   entry_SYSCALL_64_after…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/oesa-2025-2633</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2025-20081-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2025-20081-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2025-20081-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SSA-032379 — SSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ssa-032379</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ssa-032379</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:03600-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/suse-su-2025:03600-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/suse-su-2025:03600-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-39685</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39685</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 215 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: comedi: pcl726: Prevent invalid irq number The reproducer passed in an irq number(0x80008000) that was too large, which triggered the oob. Added an interrupt number check to prevent users from passing in an irq number that was too large. If `it-&amp;gt;options[1]` is 31, then `1 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; it-&amp;gt;options[1]` is still invalid because it shifts a 1-bit into the sign bit (which is UB in C). Possible solutions include reducing the upper bound on the `it-&amp;gt;options[1]` value to 30 or lower, or using `1U &amp;lt;&amp;lt; it-&amp;gt;options[1]`. The old code would just not attempt to request the IRQ if the `options[1]` value were invalid.  And it would still configure the device without interrupts even if the call to `request_irq` returned an error.  So it would be better to combine this test with the test below.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 215 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: comedi: pcl726: Prevent invalid irq number The reproducer passed in an irq number(0x80008000) that was too large, which triggered the oob. Added an interrupt number check to prevent users from passing in an irq number that was too large. If `it-&amp;gt;options[1]` is 31, then `1 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; it-&amp;gt;options[1]` is still invalid because it shifts a 1-bit into the sign bit (which is UB in C). Possible solutions include reducing the upper bound on the `it-&amp;gt;options[1]` value to 30 or lower, or using `1U &amp;lt;&amp;lt; it-&amp;gt;options[1]`. The old code would just not attempt to request the IRQ if the `options[1]` value were invalid.  And it would still configure the device without interrupts even if the call to `request_irq` returned an error.  So it would be better to combine this test with the test below.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39685</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-1988 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1988</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
