<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:59:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-10050 — Digest authentication lossy encoding</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-10050</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Jetty - EE8, Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Jetty - EE9, Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Jetty&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Eclipse Jetty, the Digest authentication server-side component uses ISO-8859-1 to encode the password as bytes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was done because the initial specification for HTTP did not specify explicitly a charset, and it was assumed to be ISO-8859-1 for historical reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the password contains characters that cannot be represented in ISO-8859-1, they are silently replaced by `?`. This happens with passwords that contain Chinese, Cyrillic or Greek characters, for example: `αβ123` converts to `??123`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An attacker can send a request with a digest `Authorization` header crafted with a password made of only `?` characters; the server would match any password of the same length that contains non-ISO-8859-1 characters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent HTTP Digest [RFC-7616](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7616) supports a `charset` parameters that defaults to UTF-8 that allows for correct encoding/decoding of passwords.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Jetty - EE8, Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Jetty - EE9, Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Jetty&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Eclipse Jetty, the Digest authentication server-side component uses ISO-8859-1 to encode the password as bytes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was done because the initial specification for HTTP did not specify explicitly a charset, and it was assumed to be ISO-8859-1 for historical reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the password contains characters that cannot be represented in ISO-8859-1, they are silently replaced by `?`. This happens with passwords that contain Chinese, Cyrillic or Greek characters, for example: `αβ123` converts to `??123`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An attacker can send a request with a digest `Authorization` header crafted with a password made of only `?` characters; the server would match any password of the same length that contains non-ISO-8859-1 characters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent HTTP Digest [RFC-7616](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7616) supports a `charset` parameters that defaults to UTF-8 that allows for correct encoding/decoding of passwords.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-10050</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq — jackson-core: Number Length Constraint Bypass in Async Parser Leads to Potential DoS Condition</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-72hv-8253-57qq</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Maven: tools.jackson.core:jackson-core, Maven: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
The non-blocking (async) JSON parser in `jackson-core` bypasses the `maxNumberLength` constraint (default: 1000 characters) defined in `StreamReadConstraints`. This allows an attacker to send JSON with arbitrarily long numbers through the async parser API, leading to excessive memory allocation and potential CPU exhaustion, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The standard synchronous parser correctly enforces this limit, but the async parser fails to do so, creating an inconsistent enforcement policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
The root cause is that the async parsing path in `NonBlockingUtf8JsonParserBase` (and related classes) does not call the methods responsible for number length validation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- The number parsing methods (e.g., `_finishNumberIntegralPart`) accumulate digits into the `TextBuffer` without any length checks.
- After parsing, they call `_valueComplete()`, which finalizes the token but does **not** call `resetInt()` or `resetFloat()`.
- The `resetInt()`/`resetFloat()` methods in `ParserBase` are where the `validateIntegerLength()` and `validateFPLength()` checks are performed.
- Because this validation step is skipped, the `maxNumberLength` constraint is never enforced in the async code path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### PoC
The following JUnit 5 test demonstrates the vulnerability. It shows that the async parser accepts a 5,000-digit number, whereas the limit should be 1,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```java
package tools.jackson.core.unittest.dos;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;import org…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Maven: tools.jackson.core:jackson-core, Maven: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
The non-blocking (async) JSON parser in `jackson-core` bypasses the `maxNumberLength` constraint (default: 1000 characters) defined in `StreamReadConstraints`. This allows an attacker to send JSON with arbitrarily long numbers through the async parser API, leading to excessive memory allocation and potential CPU exhaustion, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The standard synchronous parser correctly enforces this limit, but the async parser fails to do so, creating an inconsistent enforcement policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
The root cause is that the async parsing path in `NonBlockingUtf8JsonParserBase` (and related classes) does not call the methods responsible for number length validation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- The number parsing methods (e.g., `_finishNumberIntegralPart`) accumulate digits into the `TextBuffer` without any length checks.
- After parsing, they call `_valueComplete()`, which finalizes the token but does **not** call `resetInt()` or `resetFloat()`.
- The `resetInt()`/`resetFloat()` methods in `ParserBase` are where the `validateIntegerLength()` and `validateFPLength()` checks are performed.
- Because this validation step is skipped, the `maxNumberLength` constraint is never enforced in the async code path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### PoC
The following JUnit 5 test demonstrates the vulnerability. It shows that the async parser accepts a 5,000-digit number, whereas the limit should be 1,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```java
package tools.jackson.core.unittest.dos;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;import org…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-72hv-8253-57qq</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
