<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-13697 — undici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure and parse-time crash via degenerate private cache directives</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-13697</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; undici&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;undici&amp;#39;s cache interceptor mishandles malformed Cache-Control private directives. In undici 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, a response carrying a degenerate qualified private directive, such as private set to an empty value, can be stored in the default shared cache and later served to a different caller with the same cache key, disclosing private response bodies and headers including Set-Cookie. Separately, a Cache-Control header that combines an unqualified private directive with a qualified one triggers an uncaught TypeError in the cache-control parser, which rejects the request and, depending on the consumer&amp;#39;s error handling, can terminate the process. Both issues affect applications using the cache interceptor in shared mode, including the default configuration. The issues are fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; undici&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;undici&amp;#39;s cache interceptor mishandles malformed Cache-Control private directives. In undici 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, a response carrying a degenerate qualified private directive, such as private set to an empty value, can be stored in the default shared cache and later served to a different caller with the same cache key, disclosing private response bodies and headers including Set-Cookie. Separately, a Cache-Control header that combines an unqualified private directive with a qualified one triggers an uncaught TypeError in the cache-control parser, which rejects the request and, depending on the consumer&amp;#39;s error handling, can terminate the process. Both issues affect applications using the cache interceptor in shared mode, including the default configuration. The issues are fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-13697</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-55q2-fjhq-7xh7 — DOMPurify: IN_PLACE hook removal leaves a detached subtree executable, causing XSS</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-55q2-fjhq-7xh7</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: dompurify&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During `IN_PLACE` sanitization, a hook that removes an element can leave that element&amp;#39;s detached descendants executable. A descendant image can retain its attacker-provided `onload` handler and fire after `sanitize()` returns, even though the returned root is clean and the image remains disconnected from the document.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In DOMPurify 3.4.12, `_sanitizeElements()` in `src/purify.ts:1862-1904` runs the `beforeSanitizeElements` or `uponSanitizeElement` hook and returns immediately when the hook detached the current node. The return does not call `_neutralizeSubtree(currentNode)`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The detached subtree is not added to `DOMPurify.removed`, so the post-walk `IN_PLACE` neutralization cannot reach it. If the browser queued a resource event while the application constructed the detached dirty root, a descendant can therefore retain its handler and execute after sanitization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hook only rejects the containing element and does not add or approve the event handler. DOMPurify&amp;#39;s ordinary removal path de-arms the same queued event; only the hook-detachment early return skips the existing subtree neutralization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### PoC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Load the published `dompurify@3.4.12` `dist/purify.js` before this script in Chromium:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```html
&amp;lt;div id=&amp;#34;result&amp;#34;&amp;gt;not fired&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;script&amp;gt;
const root = document.createElement(&amp;#39;div&amp;#39;);
root.innerHTML = `
  &amp;lt;footer&amp;gt;
    &amp;lt;img src=&amp;#34;&amp;#34;
         onload=&amp;#34;result.textContent = &amp;#39;XS…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: dompurify&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During `IN_PLACE` sanitization, a hook that removes an element can leave that element&amp;#39;s detached descendants executable. A descendant image can retain its attacker-provided `onload` handler and fire after `sanitize()` returns, even though the returned root is clean and the image remains disconnected from the document.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In DOMPurify 3.4.12, `_sanitizeElements()` in `src/purify.ts:1862-1904` runs the `beforeSanitizeElements` or `uponSanitizeElement` hook and returns immediately when the hook detached the current node. The return does not call `_neutralizeSubtree(currentNode)`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The detached subtree is not added to `DOMPurify.removed`, so the post-walk `IN_PLACE` neutralization cannot reach it. If the browser queued a resource event while the application constructed the detached dirty root, a descendant can therefore retain its handler and execute after sanitization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hook only rejects the containing element and does not add or approve the event handler. DOMPurify&amp;#39;s ordinary removal path de-arms the same queued event; only the hook-detachment early return skips the existing subtree neutralization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### PoC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Load the published `dompurify@3.4.12` `dist/purify.js` before this script in Chromium:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```html
&amp;lt;div id=&amp;#34;result&amp;#34;&amp;gt;not fired&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;script&amp;gt;
const root = document.createElement(&amp;#39;div&amp;#39;);
root.innerHTML = `
  &amp;lt;footer&amp;gt;
    &amp;lt;img src=&amp;#34;&amp;#34;
         onload=&amp;#34;result.textContent = &amp;#39;XS…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-55q2-fjhq-7xh7</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
