<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:08:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-68161 — Apache Log4j Core: Missing TLS hostname verification in Socket appender</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-68161</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Apache Software Foundation Apache Log4j Core&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Socket Appender in Apache Log4j Core versions 2.0-beta9 through 2.25.2 does not perform TLS hostname verification of the peer certificate, even when the  verifyHostName https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders/network.html#SslConfiguration-attr-verifyHostName  configuration attribute or the  log4j2.sslVerifyHostName https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/systemproperties.html#log4j2.sslVerifyHostName  system property is set to true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue may allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to intercept or redirect log traffic under the following conditions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*  The attacker is able to intercept or redirect network traffic between the client and the log receiver.
  *  The attacker can present a server certificate issued by a certification authority trusted by the Socket Appender’s configured trust store (or by the default Java trust store if no custom trust store is configured).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j Core version 2.25.3, which addresses this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As an alternative mitigation, the Socket Appender may be configured to use a private or restricted trust root to limit the set of trusted certificates.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Apache Software Foundation Apache Log4j Core&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Socket Appender in Apache Log4j Core versions 2.0-beta9 through 2.25.2 does not perform TLS hostname verification of the peer certificate, even when the  verifyHostName https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders/network.html#SslConfiguration-attr-verifyHostName  configuration attribute or the  log4j2.sslVerifyHostName https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/systemproperties.html#log4j2.sslVerifyHostName  system property is set to true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue may allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to intercept or redirect log traffic under the following conditions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*  The attacker is able to intercept or redirect network traffic between the client and the log receiver.
  *  The attacker can present a server certificate issued by a certification authority trusted by the Socket Appender’s configured trust store (or by the default Java trust store if no custom trust store is configured).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j Core version 2.25.3, which addresses this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As an alternative mitigation, the Socket Appender may be configured to use a private or restricted trust root to limit the set of trusted certificates.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-68161</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq — jackson-core: Number Length Constraint Bypass in Async Parser Leads to Potential DoS Condition</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-72hv-8253-57qq</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Maven: tools.jackson.core:jackson-core, Maven: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
The non-blocking (async) JSON parser in `jackson-core` bypasses the `maxNumberLength` constraint (default: 1000 characters) defined in `StreamReadConstraints`. This allows an attacker to send JSON with arbitrarily long numbers through the async parser API, leading to excessive memory allocation and potential CPU exhaustion, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The standard synchronous parser correctly enforces this limit, but the async parser fails to do so, creating an inconsistent enforcement policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
The root cause is that the async parsing path in `NonBlockingUtf8JsonParserBase` (and related classes) does not call the methods responsible for number length validation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- The number parsing methods (e.g., `_finishNumberIntegralPart`) accumulate digits into the `TextBuffer` without any length checks.
- After parsing, they call `_valueComplete()`, which finalizes the token but does **not** call `resetInt()` or `resetFloat()`.
- The `resetInt()`/`resetFloat()` methods in `ParserBase` are where the `validateIntegerLength()` and `validateFPLength()` checks are performed.
- Because this validation step is skipped, the `maxNumberLength` constraint is never enforced in the async code path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### PoC
The following JUnit 5 test demonstrates the vulnerability. It shows that the async parser accepts a 5,000-digit number, whereas the limit should be 1,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```java
package tools.jackson.core.unittest.dos;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;import org…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Maven: tools.jackson.core:jackson-core, Maven: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
The non-blocking (async) JSON parser in `jackson-core` bypasses the `maxNumberLength` constraint (default: 1000 characters) defined in `StreamReadConstraints`. This allows an attacker to send JSON with arbitrarily long numbers through the async parser API, leading to excessive memory allocation and potential CPU exhaustion, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The standard synchronous parser correctly enforces this limit, but the async parser fails to do so, creating an inconsistent enforcement policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
The root cause is that the async parsing path in `NonBlockingUtf8JsonParserBase` (and related classes) does not call the methods responsible for number length validation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- The number parsing methods (e.g., `_finishNumberIntegralPart`) accumulate digits into the `TextBuffer` without any length checks.
- After parsing, they call `_valueComplete()`, which finalizes the token but does **not** call `resetInt()` or `resetFloat()`.
- The `resetInt()`/`resetFloat()` methods in `ParserBase` are where the `validateIntegerLength()` and `validateFPLength()` checks are performed.
- Because this validation step is skipped, the `maxNumberLength` constraint is never enforced in the async code path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### PoC
The following JUnit 5 test demonstrates the vulnerability. It shows that the async parser accepts a 5,000-digit number, whereas the limit should be 1,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```java
package tools.jackson.core.unittest.dos;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;import org…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-72hv-8253-57qq</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
