<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 17:26:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-6vj9-mwq6-2f5v — Nodemailer: Process-global DNS cache reuses TLS `servername` across transports, enabling cross-tenant SMTP credential d…</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-6vj9-mwq6-2f5v</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: nodemailer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nodemailer&amp;#39;s process-global DNS cache is keyed only by `host`, but each cache entry also stores the caller-specific TLS `servername`. When two direct SMTPS transports use the same DNS host with different `tls.servername` values, the first transport&amp;#39;s server name is returned to the second transport and overwrites its explicitly configured value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, Nodemailer sends the wrong SNI value and verifies the peer certificate against the wrong identity. In a multi-tenant service or SNI-routed SMTP gateway, one tenant can prime the cache so that a victim transport connects to the attacker&amp;#39;s TLS virtual host, accepts the attacker&amp;#39;s certificate with `rejectUnauthorized: true`, and sends the victim&amp;#39;s SMTP credentials to it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Affected component&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- **Ecosystem:** npm
- **Package:** `nodemailer`
- **Repository:** https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer
- **Tested version:** `10.0.1`
- **Tested commit:** `40d52215aac65b811d7e131bc916f68605efd9d2`
- **Runtime-confirmed vulnerable versions:** `5.0.0` and `10.0.1`
- **Affected versions:** `&amp;gt;= 5.0.0, &amp;lt;= 10.0.1`
- **Patched versions:** None known at the time of this report
- **Affected mode:** Direct TLS/SMTPS connections (`secure: true`) where different transports use the same non-IP `host` and different TLS `servername` values&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vulnerable cache implementation was introduced in commit `6859b5dd96c8d9f0070a3169a877181b71df4a3b` on 2018-12-28. Git history shows `v5.0.0` as the first release tag containing that commi…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: nodemailer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nodemailer&amp;#39;s process-global DNS cache is keyed only by `host`, but each cache entry also stores the caller-specific TLS `servername`. When two direct SMTPS transports use the same DNS host with different `tls.servername` values, the first transport&amp;#39;s server name is returned to the second transport and overwrites its explicitly configured value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, Nodemailer sends the wrong SNI value and verifies the peer certificate against the wrong identity. In a multi-tenant service or SNI-routed SMTP gateway, one tenant can prime the cache so that a victim transport connects to the attacker&amp;#39;s TLS virtual host, accepts the attacker&amp;#39;s certificate with `rejectUnauthorized: true`, and sends the victim&amp;#39;s SMTP credentials to it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Affected component&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- **Ecosystem:** npm
- **Package:** `nodemailer`
- **Repository:** https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer
- **Tested version:** `10.0.1`
- **Tested commit:** `40d52215aac65b811d7e131bc916f68605efd9d2`
- **Runtime-confirmed vulnerable versions:** `5.0.0` and `10.0.1`
- **Affected versions:** `&amp;gt;= 5.0.0, &amp;lt;= 10.0.1`
- **Patched versions:** None known at the time of this report
- **Affected mode:** Direct TLS/SMTPS connections (`secure: true`) where different transports use the same non-IP `host` and different TLS `servername` values&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vulnerable cache implementation was introduced in commit `6859b5dd96c8d9f0070a3169a877181b71df4a3b` on 2018-12-28. Git history shows `v5.0.0` as the first release tag containing that commi…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-6vj9-mwq6-2f5v</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
