<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 08:38:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-64262 — fuse-uring: end fuse_req on io-uring cancel task work</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-64262</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fuse-uring: end fuse_req on io-uring cancel task work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When io_uring delivers task work with tw.cancel set (PF_EXITING,
PF_KTHREAD fallback, or percpu_ref_is_dying on the ring context),
fuse_uring_send_in_task() takes the cancel branch, assigns
-ECANCELED, and falls through to fuse_uring_send(). That path only
flips the entry to FRRS_USERSPACE and completes the io_uring cmd;
it never discharges the ring entry&amp;#39;s owning reference to the
fuse_req that fuse_uring_add_req_to_ring_ent() handed it at
dispatch time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fuse_uring_send_in_task()
      tw.cancel == true
        err = -ECANCELED
      fuse_uring_send(ent, cmd, err, issue_flags)
        ent-&amp;gt;state = FRRS_USERSPACE
        list_move(&amp;amp;ent-&amp;gt;list, &amp;amp;queue-&amp;gt;ent_in_userspace)
        ent-&amp;gt;cmd = NULL
        io_uring_cmd_done(-ECANCELED)
        /* ent-&amp;gt;fuse_req still set, req still hashed */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fuse_req stays linked on fpq-&amp;gt;processing[hash] and
fuse_request_end() is never invoked. The originating syscall
thread blocks in D-state in request_wait_answer() until
fuse_abort_conn() runs, which can be the entire connection
lifetime. For FR_BACKGROUND requests fc-&amp;gt;num_background is never
decremented either, so repeated cancels inflate the counter until
max_background is hit and all later background ops stall. tw.cancel does
not imply a connection abort (e.g. a single io_uring worker thread exits
while the fuse connection stays up), so this cannot be left for
fus…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fuse-uring: end fuse_req on io-uring cancel task work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When io_uring delivers task work with tw.cancel set (PF_EXITING,
PF_KTHREAD fallback, or percpu_ref_is_dying on the ring context),
fuse_uring_send_in_task() takes the cancel branch, assigns
-ECANCELED, and falls through to fuse_uring_send(). That path only
flips the entry to FRRS_USERSPACE and completes the io_uring cmd;
it never discharges the ring entry&amp;#39;s owning reference to the
fuse_req that fuse_uring_add_req_to_ring_ent() handed it at
dispatch time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fuse_uring_send_in_task()
      tw.cancel == true
        err = -ECANCELED
      fuse_uring_send(ent, cmd, err, issue_flags)
        ent-&amp;gt;state = FRRS_USERSPACE
        list_move(&amp;amp;ent-&amp;gt;list, &amp;amp;queue-&amp;gt;ent_in_userspace)
        ent-&amp;gt;cmd = NULL
        io_uring_cmd_done(-ECANCELED)
        /* ent-&amp;gt;fuse_req still set, req still hashed */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fuse_req stays linked on fpq-&amp;gt;processing[hash] and
fuse_request_end() is never invoked. The originating syscall
thread blocks in D-state in request_wait_answer() until
fuse_abort_conn() runs, which can be the entire connection
lifetime. For FR_BACKGROUND requests fc-&amp;gt;num_background is never
decremented either, so repeated cancels inflate the counter until
max_background is hit and all later background ops stall. tw.cancel does
not imply a connection abort (e.g. a single io_uring worker thread exits
while the fuse connection stays up), so this cannot be left for
fus…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-64262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
