<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:24:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2024-40917 — memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-40917</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On an (old) x86 system with SRAT just covering space above 4Gb:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x100000000-0xfffffffff] hotplug&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the commit referenced below leads to this NUMA configuration no longer
being refused by a CONFIG_NUMA=y kernel (previously&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NUMA: nodes only cover 6144MB of your 8185MB e820 RAM. Not used.
    No NUMA configuration found
    Faking a node at [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000027fffffff]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;was seen in the log directly after the message quoted above), because of
memblock_validate_numa_coverage() checking for NUMA_NO_NODE (only). This
in turn led to memblock_alloc_range_nid()&amp;#39;s warning about MAX_NUMNODES
triggering, followed by a NULL deref in memmap_init() when trying to
access node 64&amp;#39;s (NODE_SHIFT=6) node data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To compensate said change, make memblock_set_node() warn on and adjust
a passed in value of MAX_NUMNODES, just like various other functions
already do.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On an (old) x86 system with SRAT just covering space above 4Gb:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x100000000-0xfffffffff] hotplug&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the commit referenced below leads to this NUMA configuration no longer
being refused by a CONFIG_NUMA=y kernel (previously&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NUMA: nodes only cover 6144MB of your 8185MB e820 RAM. Not used.
    No NUMA configuration found
    Faking a node at [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000027fffffff]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;was seen in the log directly after the message quoted above), because of
memblock_validate_numa_coverage() checking for NUMA_NO_NODE (only). This
in turn led to memblock_alloc_range_nid()&amp;#39;s warning about MAX_NUMNODES
triggering, followed by a NULL deref in memmap_init() when trying to
access node 64&amp;#39;s (NODE_SHIFT=6) node data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To compensate said change, make memblock_set_node() warn on and adjust
a passed in value of MAX_NUMNODES, just like various other functions
already do.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-40917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
