https://vulnerability.circl.lu Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Fri, 02 Oct 2026 08:48:22 +0000 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-46754 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>bpf: Remove tst_run from lwt_seg6local_prog_ops.</p> <p>The syzbot reported that the lwt_seg6 related BPF ops can be invoked via bpf_test_run() without without entering input_action_end_bpf() first.</p> <p>Martin KaFai Lau said that self test for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL probably didn&#39;t work since it was introduced in commit 04d4b274e2a (&#34;ipv6: sr: Add seg6local action End.BPF&#34;). The reason is that the per-CPU variable seg6_bpf_srh_states::srh is never assigned in the self test case but each BPF function expects it.</p> <p>Remove test_run for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>bpf: Remove tst_run from lwt_seg6local_prog_ops.</p> <p>The syzbot reported that the lwt_seg6 related BPF ops can be invoked via bpf_test_run() without without entering input_action_end_bpf() first.</p> <p>Martin KaFai Lau said that self test for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL probably didn&#39;t work since it was introduced in commit 04d4b274e2a (&#34;ipv6: sr: Add seg6local action End.BPF&#34;). The reason is that the per-CPU variable seg6_bpf_srh_states::srh is never assigned in the self test case but each BPF function expects it.</p> <p>Remove test_run for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL.</p> https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-46754