<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:03:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2023-53585 — bpf: reject unhashed sockets in bpf_sk_assign</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53585</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: reject unhashed sockets in bpf_sk_assign&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The semantics for bpf_sk_assign are as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sk = some_lookup_func()
    bpf_sk_assign(skb, sk)
    bpf_sk_release(sk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is, the sk is not consumed by bpf_sk_assign. The function
therefore needs to make sure that sk lives long enough to be
consumed from __inet_lookup_skb. The path through the stack for a
TCPv4 packet is roughly:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netif_receive_skb_core: takes RCU read lock
    __netif_receive_skb_core:
      sch_handle_ingress:
        tcf_classify:
          bpf_sk_assign()
      deliver_ptype_list_skb:
        deliver_skb:
          ip_packet_type-&amp;gt;func == ip_rcv:
            ip_rcv_core:
            ip_rcv_finish_core:
              dst_input:
                ip_local_deliver:
                  ip_local_deliver_finish:
                    ip_protocol_deliver_rcu:
                      tcp_v4_rcv:
                        __inet_lookup_skb:
                          skb_steal_sock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The existing helper takes advantage of the fact that everything
happens in the same RCU critical section: for sockets with
SOCK_RCU_FREE set bpf_sk_assign never takes a reference.
skb_steal_sock then checks SOCK_RCU_FREE again and does sock_put
if necessary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This approach assumes that SOCK_RCU_FREE is never set on a sk
between bpf_sk_assign and skb_steal_sock, but this invariant is
violated by unhashed UDP sockets. A new UDP socket is created
in TCP_CLOSE state but wi…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: reject unhashed sockets in bpf_sk_assign&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The semantics for bpf_sk_assign are as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sk = some_lookup_func()
    bpf_sk_assign(skb, sk)
    bpf_sk_release(sk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is, the sk is not consumed by bpf_sk_assign. The function
therefore needs to make sure that sk lives long enough to be
consumed from __inet_lookup_skb. The path through the stack for a
TCPv4 packet is roughly:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netif_receive_skb_core: takes RCU read lock
    __netif_receive_skb_core:
      sch_handle_ingress:
        tcf_classify:
          bpf_sk_assign()
      deliver_ptype_list_skb:
        deliver_skb:
          ip_packet_type-&amp;gt;func == ip_rcv:
            ip_rcv_core:
            ip_rcv_finish_core:
              dst_input:
                ip_local_deliver:
                  ip_local_deliver_finish:
                    ip_protocol_deliver_rcu:
                      tcp_v4_rcv:
                        __inet_lookup_skb:
                          skb_steal_sock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The existing helper takes advantage of the fact that everything
happens in the same RCU critical section: for sockets with
SOCK_RCU_FREE set bpf_sk_assign never takes a reference.
skb_steal_sock then checks SOCK_RCU_FREE again and does sock_put
if necessary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This approach assumes that SOCK_RCU_FREE is never set on a sk
between bpf_sk_assign and skb_steal_sock, but this invariant is
violated by unhashed UDP sockets. A new UDP socket is created
in TCP_CLOSE state but wi…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
