<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 23:05:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-23255 — net: add proper RCU protection to /proc/net/ptype</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23255</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: add proper RCU protection to /proc/net/ptype&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yin Fengwei reported an RCU stall in ptype_seq_show() and provided
a patch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Real issue is that ptype_seq_next() and ptype_seq_show() violate
RCU rules.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ptype_seq_show() runs under rcu_read_lock(), and reads pt-&amp;gt;dev
to get device name without any barrier.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the same time, concurrent writers can remove a packet_type structure
(which is correctly freed after an RCU grace period) and clear pt-&amp;gt;dev
without an RCU grace period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Define ptype_iter_state to carry a dev pointer along seq_net_private:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;struct ptype_iter_state {
	struct seq_net_private	p;
	struct net_device	*dev; // added in this patch
};&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We need to record the device pointer in ptype_get_idx() and
ptype_seq_next() so that ptype_seq_show() is safe against
concurrent pt-&amp;gt;dev changes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We also need to add full RCU protection in ptype_seq_next().
(Missing READ_ONCE() when reading list.next values)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many thanks to Dong Chenchen for providing a repro.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: add proper RCU protection to /proc/net/ptype&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yin Fengwei reported an RCU stall in ptype_seq_show() and provided
a patch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Real issue is that ptype_seq_next() and ptype_seq_show() violate
RCU rules.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ptype_seq_show() runs under rcu_read_lock(), and reads pt-&amp;gt;dev
to get device name without any barrier.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the same time, concurrent writers can remove a packet_type structure
(which is correctly freed after an RCU grace period) and clear pt-&amp;gt;dev
without an RCU grace period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Define ptype_iter_state to carry a dev pointer along seq_net_private:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;struct ptype_iter_state {
	struct seq_net_private	p;
	struct net_device	*dev; // added in this patch
};&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We need to record the device pointer in ptype_get_idx() and
ptype_seq_next() so that ptype_seq_show() is safe against
concurrent pt-&amp;gt;dev changes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We also need to add full RCU protection in ptype_seq_next().
(Missing READ_ONCE() when reading list.next values)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many thanks to Dong Chenchen for providing a repro.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
