<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:13:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-90393</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-90393</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-90393</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-90393</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-90393</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: Fix potential UAF in bpf_netns_link_update_prog&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In bpf_netns_link_update_prog, the checks for old_prog and prog type
are currently performed locklessly before acquiring netns_bpf_mutex.
This creates a race condition that can lead to a UAF issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If two threads concurrently execute BPF_LINK_UPDATE on the same netns
link, the following execution path can trigger a UAF:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                                          CPU1
bpf_netns_link_update_prog
  if (old_prog &amp;amp;&amp;amp; old_prog != link-&amp;gt;prog)
    return -EPERM;
                                              bpf_netns_link_update_prog
                                                if (old_prog &amp;amp;&amp;amp; old_prog != link-&amp;gt;prog)
                                                ...
                                                old_prog = xchg(&amp;amp;link-&amp;gt;prog, new_prog);
                                                bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
  if (new_prog-&amp;gt;type != link-&amp;gt;prog-&amp;gt;type) &amp;lt;-- trigger UAF&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by moving the old_prog and prog-&amp;gt;type checks inside the
netns_bpf_mutex critical section. Meanwhile, use guard() to simplify
lock management and avoid all the goto jumping.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: Fix potential UAF in bpf_netns_link_update_prog&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In bpf_netns_link_update_prog, the checks for old_prog and prog type
are currently performed locklessly before acquiring netns_bpf_mutex.
This creates a race condition that can lead to a UAF issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If two threads concurrently execute BPF_LINK_UPDATE on the same netns
link, the following execution path can trigger a UAF:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                                          CPU1
bpf_netns_link_update_prog
  if (old_prog &amp;amp;&amp;amp; old_prog != link-&amp;gt;prog)
    return -EPERM;
                                              bpf_netns_link_update_prog
                                                if (old_prog &amp;amp;&amp;amp; old_prog != link-&amp;gt;prog)
                                                ...
                                                old_prog = xchg(&amp;amp;link-&amp;gt;prog, new_prog);
                                                bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
  if (new_prog-&amp;gt;type != link-&amp;gt;prog-&amp;gt;type) &amp;lt;-- trigger UAF&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by moving the old_prog and prog-&amp;gt;type checks inside the
netns_bpf_mutex critical section. Meanwhile, use guard() to simplify
lock management and avoid all the goto jumping.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-90393</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-9prj-6xm5-hxjf</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-9prj-6xm5-hxjf</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: Fix potential UAF in bpf_netns_link_update_prog&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In bpf_netns_link_update_prog, the checks for old_prog and prog type
are currently performed locklessly before acquiring netns_bpf_mutex.
This creates a race condition that can lead to a UAF issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If two threads concurrently execute BPF_LINK_UPDATE on the same netns
link, the following execution path can trigger a UAF:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                                          CPU1
bpf_netns_link_update_prog
  if (old_prog &amp;amp;&amp;amp; old_prog != link-&amp;gt;prog)
    return -EPERM;
                                              bpf_netns_link_update_prog
                                                if (old_prog &amp;amp;&amp;amp; old_prog != link-&amp;gt;prog)
                                                ...
                                                old_prog = xchg(&amp;amp;link-&amp;gt;prog, new_prog);
                                                bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
  if (new_prog-&amp;gt;type != link-&amp;gt;prog-&amp;gt;type) &amp;lt;-- trigger UAF&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by moving the old_prog and prog-&amp;gt;type checks inside the
netns_bpf_mutex critical section. Meanwhile, use guard() to simplify
lock management and avoid all the goto jumping.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: Fix potential UAF in bpf_netns_link_update_prog&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In bpf_netns_link_update_prog, the checks for old_prog and prog type
are currently performed locklessly before acquiring netns_bpf_mutex.
This creates a race condition that can lead to a UAF issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If two threads concurrently execute BPF_LINK_UPDATE on the same netns
link, the following execution path can trigger a UAF:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                                          CPU1
bpf_netns_link_update_prog
  if (old_prog &amp;amp;&amp;amp; old_prog != link-&amp;gt;prog)
    return -EPERM;
                                              bpf_netns_link_update_prog
                                                if (old_prog &amp;amp;&amp;amp; old_prog != link-&amp;gt;prog)
                                                ...
                                                old_prog = xchg(&amp;amp;link-&amp;gt;prog, new_prog);
                                                bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
  if (new_prog-&amp;gt;type != link-&amp;gt;prog-&amp;gt;type) &amp;lt;-- trigger UAF&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by moving the old_prog and prog-&amp;gt;type checks inside the
netns_bpf_mutex critical section. Meanwhile, use guard() to simplify
lock management and avoid all the goto jumping.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-9prj-6xm5-hxjf</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11893-1 — kernel-devel-7.2.8-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11893-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.2.8-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.2.8-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11893-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-90393</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-90393</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 193 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix potential UAF in bpf_netns_link_update_prog In bpf_netns_link_update_prog, the checks for old_prog and prog type are currently performed locklessly before acquiring netns_bpf_mutex. This creates a race condition that can lead to a UAF issue. If two threads concurrently execute BPF_LINK_UPDATE on the same netns link, the following execution path can trigger a UAF: CPU0                                          CPU1 bpf_netns_link_update_prog   if (old_prog &amp;amp;&amp;amp; old_prog != link-&amp;gt;prog)     return -EPERM;                                               bpf_netns_link_update_prog                                                 if (old_prog &amp;amp;&amp;amp; old_prog != link-&amp;gt;prog)                                                 ...                                                 old_prog = xchg(&amp;amp;link-&amp;gt;prog, new_prog);                                                 bpf_prog_put(old_prog);   if (new_prog-&amp;gt;type != link-&amp;gt;prog-&amp;gt;type) &amp;lt;-- trigger UAF Fix this by moving the old_prog and prog-&amp;gt;type checks inside the netns_bpf_mutex critical section. Meanwhile, use guard() to simplify lock management and avoid all the goto jumping.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 193 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix potential UAF in bpf_netns_link_update_prog In bpf_netns_link_update_prog, the checks for old_prog and prog type are currently performed locklessly before acquiring netns_bpf_mutex. This creates a race condition that can lead to a UAF issue. If two threads concurrently execute BPF_LINK_UPDATE on the same netns link, the following execution path can trigger a UAF: CPU0                                          CPU1 bpf_netns_link_update_prog   if (old_prog &amp;amp;&amp;amp; old_prog != link-&amp;gt;prog)     return -EPERM;                                               bpf_netns_link_update_prog                                                 if (old_prog &amp;amp;&amp;amp; old_prog != link-&amp;gt;prog)                                                 ...                                                 old_prog = xchg(&amp;amp;link-&amp;gt;prog, new_prog);                                                 bpf_prog_put(old_prog);   if (new_prog-&amp;gt;type != link-&amp;gt;prog-&amp;gt;type) &amp;lt;-- trigger UAF Fix this by moving the old_prog and prog-&amp;gt;type checks inside the netns_bpf_mutex critical section. Meanwhile, use guard() to simplify lock management and avoid all the goto jumping.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-90393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
