<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-72288</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-72288</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-72288</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1164 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1164</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1164</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1164</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-72288</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-72288</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: arm64: vgic: Handle race between interrupt affinity change and LPI disabling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hyunwoo Kim reports some really bad races should the following
situation occur:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- LPI-I is pending in vcpu-B&amp;#39;s AP list
- vcpu-A writes to vcpu-B&amp;#39;s RD to disable its LPIs
- vcpu-C moves I from B to C&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the last two race nicely enough, vgic_prune_ap_list() can drop
the irq and AP list locks, reacquire them, and in the interval
the irq has been freed. UAF follows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix is two-fold:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Before dropping the irq and ap_list locks, take a reference on
  the irq&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Do not try to handle migration of the pending bit: there is no
  expectation that this state is retained, as per the architecture&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With that, we&amp;#39;re sure that the interrupt is still around, and we
safely remove it from the AP list as it has no target at this
stage (unless another interrupt fires, but that&amp;#39;s another story).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: arm64: vgic: Handle race between interrupt affinity change and LPI disabling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hyunwoo Kim reports some really bad races should the following
situation occur:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- LPI-I is pending in vcpu-B&amp;#39;s AP list
- vcpu-A writes to vcpu-B&amp;#39;s RD to disable its LPIs
- vcpu-C moves I from B to C&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the last two race nicely enough, vgic_prune_ap_list() can drop
the irq and AP list locks, reacquire them, and in the interval
the irq has been freed. UAF follows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix is two-fold:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Before dropping the irq and ap_list locks, take a reference on
  the irq&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Do not try to handle migration of the pending bit: there is no
  expectation that this state is retained, as per the architecture&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With that, we&amp;#39;re sure that the interrupt is still around, and we
safely remove it from the AP list as it has no target at this
stage (unless another interrupt fires, but that&amp;#39;s another story).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-72288</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-9726-h75p-mc3x</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-9726-h75p-mc3x</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: arm64: vgic: Handle race between interrupt affinity change and LPI disabling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hyunwoo Kim reports some really bad races should the following
situation occur:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- LPI-I is pending in vcpu-B&amp;#39;s AP list
- vcpu-A writes to vcpu-B&amp;#39;s RD to disable its LPIs
- vcpu-C moves I from B to C&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the last two race nicely enough, vgic_prune_ap_list() can drop
the irq and AP list locks, reacquire them, and in the interval
the irq has been freed. UAF follows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix is two-fold:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Before dropping the irq and ap_list locks, take a reference on
  the irq&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Do not try to handle migration of the pending bit: there is no
  expectation that this state is retained, as per the architecture&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With that, we&amp;#39;re sure that the interrupt is still around, and we
safely remove it from the AP list as it has no target at this
stage (unless another interrupt fires, but that&amp;#39;s another story).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: arm64: vgic: Handle race between interrupt affinity change and LPI disabling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hyunwoo Kim reports some really bad races should the following
situation occur:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- LPI-I is pending in vcpu-B&amp;#39;s AP list
- vcpu-A writes to vcpu-B&amp;#39;s RD to disable its LPIs
- vcpu-C moves I from B to C&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the last two race nicely enough, vgic_prune_ap_list() can drop
the irq and AP list locks, reacquire them, and in the interval
the irq has been freed. UAF follows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix is two-fold:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Before dropping the irq and ap_list locks, take a reference on
  the irq&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Do not try to handle migration of the pending bit: there is no
  expectation that this state is retained, as per the architecture&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With that, we&amp;#39;re sure that the interrupt is still around, and we
safely remove it from the AP list as it has no target at this
stage (unless another interrupt fires, but that&amp;#39;s another story).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-9726-h75p-mc3x</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-72288 — KVM: arm64: vgic: Handle race between interrupt affinity change and LPI disabling</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-72288</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-72288</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-72288</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3707 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/oesa-2026-3707</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;seg6: separate dst_cache for input and output paths in seg6 lwtunnel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The seg6 lwtunnel uses a single dst_cache per encap route, shared
between seg6_input_core() and seg6_output_core(). These two paths
can perform the post-encap SID lookup in different routing contexts
(e.g., ip rules matching on the ingress interface, or VRF table
separation). Whichever path runs first populates the cache, and the
other reuses it blindly, bypassing its own lookup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by splitting the cache into cache_input and cache_output,
so each path maintains its own cached dst independently.(CVE-2026-31668)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RDMA/rxe: Fix iova-to-va conversion for MR page sizes != PAGE_SIZE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current implementation incorrectly handles memory regions (MRs) with
page sizes different from the system PAGE_SIZE. The core issue is that
rxe_set_page() is called with mr-&amp;amp;gt;page_size step increments, but the
page_list stores individual struct page pointers, each representing
PAGE_SIZE of memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ib_sg_to_page() has ensured that when i&amp;amp;gt;=1 either
a) SG[i-1].dma_end and SG[i].dma_addr are contiguous
or
b) SG[i-1].dma_end and SG[i].dma_addr are mr-&amp;amp;gt;page_size aligned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leads to incorrect iova-to-va conversion in scenarios:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) page_size &amp;amp;lt; PAGE_SIZE (e.g., MR: 4K, system: 64K):
   ibmr-&amp;amp;gt;iova = 0x1…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;seg6: separate dst_cache for input and output paths in seg6 lwtunnel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The seg6 lwtunnel uses a single dst_cache per encap route, shared
between seg6_input_core() and seg6_output_core(). These two paths
can perform the post-encap SID lookup in different routing contexts
(e.g., ip rules matching on the ingress interface, or VRF table
separation). Whichever path runs first populates the cache, and the
other reuses it blindly, bypassing its own lookup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by splitting the cache into cache_input and cache_output,
so each path maintains its own cached dst independently.(CVE-2026-31668)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RDMA/rxe: Fix iova-to-va conversion for MR page sizes != PAGE_SIZE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current implementation incorrectly handles memory regions (MRs) with
page sizes different from the system PAGE_SIZE. The core issue is that
rxe_set_page() is called with mr-&amp;amp;gt;page_size step increments, but the
page_list stores individual struct page pointers, each representing
PAGE_SIZE of memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ib_sg_to_page() has ensured that when i&amp;amp;gt;=1 either
a) SG[i-1].dma_end and SG[i].dma_addr are contiguous
or
b) SG[i-1].dma_end and SG[i].dma_addr are mr-&amp;amp;gt;page_size aligned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leads to incorrect iova-to-va conversion in scenarios:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) page_size &amp;amp;lt; PAGE_SIZE (e.g., MR: 4K, system: 64K):
   ibmr-&amp;amp;gt;iova = 0x1…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/oesa-2026-3707</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:21910-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21910-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21910-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23477-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/suse-su-2026:23477-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/suse-su-2026:23477-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-72288</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-72288</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0 and 239 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: arm64: vgic: Handle race between interrupt affinity change and LPI disabling Hyunwoo Kim reports some really bad races should the following situation occur: - LPI-I is pending in vcpu-B&amp;#39;s AP list - vcpu-A writes to vcpu-B&amp;#39;s RD to disable its LPIs - vcpu-C moves I from B to C If the last two race nicely enough, vgic_prune_ap_list() can drop the irq and AP list locks, reacquire them, and in the interval the irq has been freed. UAF follows. The fix is two-fold: - Before dropping the irq and ap_list locks, take a reference on   the irq - Do not try to handle migration of the pending bit: there is no   expectation that this state is retained, as per the architecture With that, we&amp;#39;re sure that the interrupt is still around, and we safely remove it from the AP list as it has no target at this stage (unless another interrupt fires, but that&amp;#39;s another story).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0 and 239 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: arm64: vgic: Handle race between interrupt affinity change and LPI disabling Hyunwoo Kim reports some really bad races should the following situation occur: - LPI-I is pending in vcpu-B&amp;#39;s AP list - vcpu-A writes to vcpu-B&amp;#39;s RD to disable its LPIs - vcpu-C moves I from B to C If the last two race nicely enough, vgic_prune_ap_list() can drop the irq and AP list locks, reacquire them, and in the interval the irq has been freed. UAF follows. The fix is two-fold: - Before dropping the irq and ap_list locks, take a reference on   the irq - Do not try to handle migration of the pending bit: there is no   expectation that this state is retained, as per the architecture With that, we&amp;#39;re sure that the interrupt is still around, and we safely remove it from the AP list as it has no target at this stage (unless another interrupt fires, but that&amp;#39;s another story).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-72288</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2852 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2852</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
