<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-64459</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64459</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64459</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1162 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1162</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1162</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1162</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-64459</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64459</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tcp: restore RCU grace period in tcp_ao_destroy_sock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit 51e547e8c89c (&amp;#34;tcp: Free TCP-AO/TCP-MD5 info/keys without RCU&amp;#34;)
removed the call_rcu() callback from tcp_ao_destroy_sock(), arguing that
&amp;#34;the destruction of info/keys is delayed until the socket destructor&amp;#34;
and therefore &amp;#34;no one can discover it anymore&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That argument does not hold for the call site in tcp_connect()
(net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4327-4332). At that point the socket is in
TCP_SYN_SENT, has already been inserted into the inet ehash by
inet_hash_connect() in tcp_v4_connect(), and is therefore very much
discoverable: any softirq running tcp_v4_rcv() on another CPU can take
the socket out of the ehash, walk into tcp_inbound_hash(), and load
tp-&amp;gt;ao_info via implicit RCU before bh_lock_sock_nested() is taken on
the destroying CPU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reader path then enters __tcp_ao_do_lookup() (net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c:208)
which re-loads tp-&amp;gt;ao_info via rcu_dereference_check(); the re-load can
still observe the (about-to-be-freed) pointer because there is no
synchronize_rcu() between rcu_assign_pointer(tp-&amp;gt;ao_info, NULL) and
tcp_ao_info_free() in tcp_ao_destroy_sock(). The captured pointer is
then walked at line 223:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &amp;amp;ao-&amp;gt;head, node, ...)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The writer&amp;#39;s synchronous kfree() is free to complete between the line
218 re-fetch and the line 223 hlist iteration. The slab is reused
(or simply LIST_POISON1-stamped if not yet reused) and the…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tcp: restore RCU grace period in tcp_ao_destroy_sock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit 51e547e8c89c (&amp;#34;tcp: Free TCP-AO/TCP-MD5 info/keys without RCU&amp;#34;)
removed the call_rcu() callback from tcp_ao_destroy_sock(), arguing that
&amp;#34;the destruction of info/keys is delayed until the socket destructor&amp;#34;
and therefore &amp;#34;no one can discover it anymore&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That argument does not hold for the call site in tcp_connect()
(net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4327-4332). At that point the socket is in
TCP_SYN_SENT, has already been inserted into the inet ehash by
inet_hash_connect() in tcp_v4_connect(), and is therefore very much
discoverable: any softirq running tcp_v4_rcv() on another CPU can take
the socket out of the ehash, walk into tcp_inbound_hash(), and load
tp-&amp;gt;ao_info via implicit RCU before bh_lock_sock_nested() is taken on
the destroying CPU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reader path then enters __tcp_ao_do_lookup() (net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c:208)
which re-loads tp-&amp;gt;ao_info via rcu_dereference_check(); the re-load can
still observe the (about-to-be-freed) pointer because there is no
synchronize_rcu() between rcu_assign_pointer(tp-&amp;gt;ao_info, NULL) and
tcp_ao_info_free() in tcp_ao_destroy_sock(). The captured pointer is
then walked at line 223:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &amp;amp;ao-&amp;gt;head, node, ...)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The writer&amp;#39;s synchronous kfree() is free to complete between the line
218 re-fetch and the line 223 hlist iteration. The slab is reused
(or simply LIST_POISON1-stamped if not yet reused) and the…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64459</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-6hpw-qg6p-q7xc</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-6hpw-qg6p-q7xc</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tcp: restore RCU grace period in tcp_ao_destroy_sock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit 51e547e8c89c (&amp;#34;tcp: Free TCP-AO/TCP-MD5 info/keys without RCU&amp;#34;)
removed the call_rcu() callback from tcp_ao_destroy_sock(), arguing that
&amp;#34;the destruction of info/keys is delayed until the socket destructor&amp;#34;
and therefore &amp;#34;no one can discover it anymore&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That argument does not hold for the call site in tcp_connect()
(net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4327-4332). At that point the socket is in
TCP_SYN_SENT, has already been inserted into the inet ehash by
inet_hash_connect() in tcp_v4_connect(), and is therefore very much
discoverable: any softirq running tcp_v4_rcv() on another CPU can take
the socket out of the ehash, walk into tcp_inbound_hash(), and load
tp-&amp;gt;ao_info via implicit RCU before bh_lock_sock_nested() is taken on
the destroying CPU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reader path then enters __tcp_ao_do_lookup() (net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c:208)
which re-loads tp-&amp;gt;ao_info via rcu_dereference_check(); the re-load can
still observe the (about-to-be-freed) pointer because there is no
synchronize_rcu() between rcu_assign_pointer(tp-&amp;gt;ao_info, NULL) and
tcp_ao_info_free() in tcp_ao_destroy_sock(). The captured pointer is
then walked at line 223:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &amp;amp;ao-&amp;gt;head, node, ...)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The writer&amp;#39;s synchronous kfree() is free to complete between the line
218 re-fetch and the line 223 hlist iteration. The slab is reused
(or simply LIST_POISON1-stamped if not yet reused) and the…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tcp: restore RCU grace period in tcp_ao_destroy_sock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit 51e547e8c89c (&amp;#34;tcp: Free TCP-AO/TCP-MD5 info/keys without RCU&amp;#34;)
removed the call_rcu() callback from tcp_ao_destroy_sock(), arguing that
&amp;#34;the destruction of info/keys is delayed until the socket destructor&amp;#34;
and therefore &amp;#34;no one can discover it anymore&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That argument does not hold for the call site in tcp_connect()
(net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4327-4332). At that point the socket is in
TCP_SYN_SENT, has already been inserted into the inet ehash by
inet_hash_connect() in tcp_v4_connect(), and is therefore very much
discoverable: any softirq running tcp_v4_rcv() on another CPU can take
the socket out of the ehash, walk into tcp_inbound_hash(), and load
tp-&amp;gt;ao_info via implicit RCU before bh_lock_sock_nested() is taken on
the destroying CPU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reader path then enters __tcp_ao_do_lookup() (net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c:208)
which re-loads tp-&amp;gt;ao_info via rcu_dereference_check(); the re-load can
still observe the (about-to-be-freed) pointer because there is no
synchronize_rcu() between rcu_assign_pointer(tp-&amp;gt;ao_info, NULL) and
tcp_ao_info_free() in tcp_ao_destroy_sock(). The captured pointer is
then walked at line 223:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &amp;amp;ao-&amp;gt;head, node, ...)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The writer&amp;#39;s synchronous kfree() is free to complete between the line
218 re-fetch and the line 223 hlist iteration. The slab is reused
(or simply LIST_POISON1-stamped if not yet reused) and the…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-6hpw-qg6p-q7xc</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11476-1 — kernel-devel-7.1.7-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11476-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.1.7-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.1.7-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11476-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-64459</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64459</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 112 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: restore RCU grace period in tcp_ao_destroy_sock Commit 51e547e8c89c (&amp;#34;tcp: Free TCP-AO/TCP-MD5 info/keys without RCU&amp;#34;) removed the call_rcu() callback from tcp_ao_destroy_sock(), arguing that &amp;#34;the destruction of info/keys is delayed until the socket destructor&amp;#34; and therefore &amp;#34;no one can discover it anymore&amp;#34;. That argument does not hold for the call site in tcp_connect() (net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4327-4332). At that point the socket is in TCP_SYN_SENT, has already been inserted into the inet ehash by inet_hash_connect() in tcp_v4_connect(), and is therefore very much discoverable: any softirq running tcp_v4_rcv() on another CPU can take the socket out of the ehash, walk into tcp_inbound_hash(), and load tp-&amp;gt;ao_info via implicit RCU before bh_lock_sock_nested() is taken on the destroying CPU. The reader path then enters __tcp_ao_do_lookup() (net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c:208) which re-loads tp-&amp;gt;ao_info via rcu_dereference_check(); the re-load can still observe the (about-to-be-freed) pointer because there is no synchronize_rcu() between rcu_assign_pointer(tp-&amp;gt;ao_info, NULL) and tcp_ao_info_free() in tcp_ao_destroy_sock(). The captured pointer is then walked at line 223: 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &amp;amp;ao-&amp;gt;head, node, ...) The writer&amp;#39;s synchronous kfree() is free to complete between the line 218 re-fetch and the line 223 hlist iteration. The slab is reused (or simply LIST_POISON1-stamped if not yet reused) and the iterat…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 112 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: restore RCU grace period in tcp_ao_destroy_sock Commit 51e547e8c89c (&amp;#34;tcp: Free TCP-AO/TCP-MD5 info/keys without RCU&amp;#34;) removed the call_rcu() callback from tcp_ao_destroy_sock(), arguing that &amp;#34;the destruction of info/keys is delayed until the socket destructor&amp;#34; and therefore &amp;#34;no one can discover it anymore&amp;#34;. That argument does not hold for the call site in tcp_connect() (net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4327-4332). At that point the socket is in TCP_SYN_SENT, has already been inserted into the inet ehash by inet_hash_connect() in tcp_v4_connect(), and is therefore very much discoverable: any softirq running tcp_v4_rcv() on another CPU can take the socket out of the ehash, walk into tcp_inbound_hash(), and load tp-&amp;gt;ao_info via implicit RCU before bh_lock_sock_nested() is taken on the destroying CPU. The reader path then enters __tcp_ao_do_lookup() (net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c:208) which re-loads tp-&amp;gt;ao_info via rcu_dereference_check(); the re-load can still observe the (about-to-be-freed) pointer because there is no synchronize_rcu() between rcu_assign_pointer(tp-&amp;gt;ao_info, NULL) and tcp_ao_info_free() in tcp_ao_destroy_sock(). The captured pointer is then walked at line 223: 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &amp;amp;ao-&amp;gt;head, node, ...) The writer&amp;#39;s synchronous kfree() is free to complete between the line 218 re-fetch and the line 223 hlist iteration. The slab is reused (or simply LIST_POISON1-stamped if not yet reused) and the iterat…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64459</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2527 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2527</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
