<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 16:20:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-64262</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64262</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64262</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1162 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1162</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1162</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1162</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-64262</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64262</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fuse-uring: end fuse_req on io-uring cancel task work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When io_uring delivers task work with tw.cancel set (PF_EXITING,
PF_KTHREAD fallback, or percpu_ref_is_dying on the ring context),
fuse_uring_send_in_task() takes the cancel branch, assigns
-ECANCELED, and falls through to fuse_uring_send(). That path only
flips the entry to FRRS_USERSPACE and completes the io_uring cmd;
it never discharges the ring entry&amp;#39;s owning reference to the
fuse_req that fuse_uring_add_req_to_ring_ent() handed it at
dispatch time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fuse_uring_send_in_task()
      tw.cancel == true
        err = -ECANCELED
      fuse_uring_send(ent, cmd, err, issue_flags)
        ent-&amp;gt;state = FRRS_USERSPACE
        list_move(&amp;amp;ent-&amp;gt;list, &amp;amp;queue-&amp;gt;ent_in_userspace)
        ent-&amp;gt;cmd = NULL
        io_uring_cmd_done(-ECANCELED)
        /* ent-&amp;gt;fuse_req still set, req still hashed */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fuse_req stays linked on fpq-&amp;gt;processing[hash] and
fuse_request_end() is never invoked. The originating syscall
thread blocks in D-state in request_wait_answer() until
fuse_abort_conn() runs, which can be the entire connection
lifetime. For FR_BACKGROUND requests fc-&amp;gt;num_background is never
decremented either, so repeated cancels inflate the counter until
max_background is hit and all later background ops stall. tw.cancel does
not imply a connection abort (e.g. a single io_uring worker thread exits
while the fuse connection stays up), so this cannot be left for
fus…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fuse-uring: end fuse_req on io-uring cancel task work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When io_uring delivers task work with tw.cancel set (PF_EXITING,
PF_KTHREAD fallback, or percpu_ref_is_dying on the ring context),
fuse_uring_send_in_task() takes the cancel branch, assigns
-ECANCELED, and falls through to fuse_uring_send(). That path only
flips the entry to FRRS_USERSPACE and completes the io_uring cmd;
it never discharges the ring entry&amp;#39;s owning reference to the
fuse_req that fuse_uring_add_req_to_ring_ent() handed it at
dispatch time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fuse_uring_send_in_task()
      tw.cancel == true
        err = -ECANCELED
      fuse_uring_send(ent, cmd, err, issue_flags)
        ent-&amp;gt;state = FRRS_USERSPACE
        list_move(&amp;amp;ent-&amp;gt;list, &amp;amp;queue-&amp;gt;ent_in_userspace)
        ent-&amp;gt;cmd = NULL
        io_uring_cmd_done(-ECANCELED)
        /* ent-&amp;gt;fuse_req still set, req still hashed */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fuse_req stays linked on fpq-&amp;gt;processing[hash] and
fuse_request_end() is never invoked. The originating syscall
thread blocks in D-state in request_wait_answer() until
fuse_abort_conn() runs, which can be the entire connection
lifetime. For FR_BACKGROUND requests fc-&amp;gt;num_background is never
decremented either, so repeated cancels inflate the counter until
max_background is hit and all later background ops stall. tw.cancel does
not imply a connection abort (e.g. a single io_uring worker thread exits
while the fuse connection stays up), so this cannot be left for
fus…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64262</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-fxm4-5828-j89m</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-fxm4-5828-j89m</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fuse-uring: end fuse_req on io-uring cancel task work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When io_uring delivers task work with tw.cancel set (PF_EXITING,
PF_KTHREAD fallback, or percpu_ref_is_dying on the ring context),
fuse_uring_send_in_task() takes the cancel branch, assigns
-ECANCELED, and falls through to fuse_uring_send(). That path only
flips the entry to FRRS_USERSPACE and completes the io_uring cmd;
it never discharges the ring entry&amp;#39;s owning reference to the
fuse_req that fuse_uring_add_req_to_ring_ent() handed it at
dispatch time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fuse_uring_send_in_task()
      tw.cancel == true
        err = -ECANCELED
      fuse_uring_send(ent, cmd, err, issue_flags)
        ent-&amp;gt;state = FRRS_USERSPACE
        list_move(&amp;amp;ent-&amp;gt;list, &amp;amp;queue-&amp;gt;ent_in_userspace)
        ent-&amp;gt;cmd = NULL
        io_uring_cmd_done(-ECANCELED)
        /* ent-&amp;gt;fuse_req still set, req still hashed */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fuse_req stays linked on fpq-&amp;gt;processing[hash] and
fuse_request_end() is never invoked. The originating syscall
thread blocks in D-state in request_wait_answer() until
fuse_abort_conn() runs, which can be the entire connection
lifetime. For FR_BACKGROUND requests fc-&amp;gt;num_background is never
decremented either, so repeated cancels inflate the counter until
max_background is hit and all later background ops stall. tw.cancel does
not imply a connection abort (e.g. a single io_uring worker thread exits
while the fuse connection stays up), so this cannot be left for
fus…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fuse-uring: end fuse_req on io-uring cancel task work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When io_uring delivers task work with tw.cancel set (PF_EXITING,
PF_KTHREAD fallback, or percpu_ref_is_dying on the ring context),
fuse_uring_send_in_task() takes the cancel branch, assigns
-ECANCELED, and falls through to fuse_uring_send(). That path only
flips the entry to FRRS_USERSPACE and completes the io_uring cmd;
it never discharges the ring entry&amp;#39;s owning reference to the
fuse_req that fuse_uring_add_req_to_ring_ent() handed it at
dispatch time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fuse_uring_send_in_task()
      tw.cancel == true
        err = -ECANCELED
      fuse_uring_send(ent, cmd, err, issue_flags)
        ent-&amp;gt;state = FRRS_USERSPACE
        list_move(&amp;amp;ent-&amp;gt;list, &amp;amp;queue-&amp;gt;ent_in_userspace)
        ent-&amp;gt;cmd = NULL
        io_uring_cmd_done(-ECANCELED)
        /* ent-&amp;gt;fuse_req still set, req still hashed */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fuse_req stays linked on fpq-&amp;gt;processing[hash] and
fuse_request_end() is never invoked. The originating syscall
thread blocks in D-state in request_wait_answer() until
fuse_abort_conn() runs, which can be the entire connection
lifetime. For FR_BACKGROUND requests fc-&amp;gt;num_background is never
decremented either, so repeated cancels inflate the counter until
max_background is hit and all later background ops stall. tw.cancel does
not imply a connection abort (e.g. a single io_uring worker thread exits
while the fuse connection stays up), so this cannot be left for
fus…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-fxm4-5828-j89m</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11476-1 — kernel-devel-7.1.7-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11476-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.1.7-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.1.7-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11476-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-64262</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64262</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 119 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fuse-uring: end fuse_req on io-uring cancel task work When io_uring delivers task work with tw.cancel set (PF_EXITING, PF_KTHREAD fallback, or percpu_ref_is_dying on the ring context), fuse_uring_send_in_task() takes the cancel branch, assigns -ECANCELED, and falls through to fuse_uring_send(). That path only flips the entry to FRRS_USERSPACE and completes the io_uring cmd; it never discharges the ring entry&amp;#39;s owning reference to the fuse_req that fuse_uring_add_req_to_ring_ent() handed it at dispatch time.     fuse_uring_send_in_task()       tw.cancel == true         err = -ECANCELED       fuse_uring_send(ent, cmd, err, issue_flags)         ent-&amp;gt;state = FRRS_USERSPACE         list_move(&amp;amp;ent-&amp;gt;list, &amp;amp;queue-&amp;gt;ent_in_userspace)         ent-&amp;gt;cmd = NULL         io_uring_cmd_done(-ECANCELED)         /* ent-&amp;gt;fuse_req still set, req still hashed */ The fuse_req stays linked on fpq-&amp;gt;processing[hash] and fuse_request_end() is never invoked. The originating syscall thread blocks in D-state in request_wait_answer() until fuse_abort_conn() runs, which can be the entire connection lifetime. For FR_BACKGROUND requests fc-&amp;gt;num_background is never decremented either, so repeated cancels inflate the counter until max_background is hit and all later background ops stall. tw.cancel does not imply a connection abort (e.g. a single io_uring worker thread exits while the fuse connection stays up), so this cannot be left for fuse_ab…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 119 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fuse-uring: end fuse_req on io-uring cancel task work When io_uring delivers task work with tw.cancel set (PF_EXITING, PF_KTHREAD fallback, or percpu_ref_is_dying on the ring context), fuse_uring_send_in_task() takes the cancel branch, assigns -ECANCELED, and falls through to fuse_uring_send(). That path only flips the entry to FRRS_USERSPACE and completes the io_uring cmd; it never discharges the ring entry&amp;#39;s owning reference to the fuse_req that fuse_uring_add_req_to_ring_ent() handed it at dispatch time.     fuse_uring_send_in_task()       tw.cancel == true         err = -ECANCELED       fuse_uring_send(ent, cmd, err, issue_flags)         ent-&amp;gt;state = FRRS_USERSPACE         list_move(&amp;amp;ent-&amp;gt;list, &amp;amp;queue-&amp;gt;ent_in_userspace)         ent-&amp;gt;cmd = NULL         io_uring_cmd_done(-ECANCELED)         /* ent-&amp;gt;fuse_req still set, req still hashed */ The fuse_req stays linked on fpq-&amp;gt;processing[hash] and fuse_request_end() is never invoked. The originating syscall thread blocks in D-state in request_wait_answer() until fuse_abort_conn() runs, which can be the entire connection lifetime. For FR_BACKGROUND requests fc-&amp;gt;num_background is never decremented either, so repeated cancels inflate the counter until max_background is hit and all later background ops stall. tw.cancel does not imply a connection abort (e.g. a single io_uring worker thread exits while the fuse connection stays up), so this cannot be left for fuse_ab…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64262</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2527 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2527</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
