<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 02:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-100070</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-100070</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfilter: nf_nat_sip: rewind offset when NAT shrinks the packet&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sashiko says:
 If map_addr() changes the packet length, such as when the public NAT IP
 string is shorter or longer than the internal IP, coff will still point to
 the offset relative to the pre-mangled packet.
 If the packet shrinks, coff could overshoot the correct position,
 potentially causing the next ct_sip_parse_header_uri() call to silently
 skip bytes and miss subsequent Contact headers. Could this lead to a
 failure to NAT those subsequent headers and leak internal network details?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfilter: nf_nat_sip: rewind offset when NAT shrinks the packet&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sashiko says:
 If map_addr() changes the packet length, such as when the public NAT IP
 string is shorter or longer than the internal IP, coff will still point to
 the offset relative to the pre-mangled packet.
 If the packet shrinks, coff could overshoot the correct position,
 potentially causing the next ct_sip_parse_header_uri() call to silently
 skip bytes and miss subsequent Contact headers. Could this lead to a
 failure to NAT those subsequent headers and leak internal network details?&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-100070</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-hw8v-4xhx-cmhp</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-hw8v-4xhx-cmhp</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfilter: nf_nat_sip: rewind offset when NAT shrinks the packet&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sashiko says:
 If map_addr() changes the packet length, such as when the public NAT IP
 string is shorter or longer than the internal IP, coff will still point to
 the offset relative to the pre-mangled packet.
 If the packet shrinks, coff could overshoot the correct position,
 potentially causing the next ct_sip_parse_header_uri() call to silently
 skip bytes and miss subsequent Contact headers. Could this lead to a
 failure to NAT those subsequent headers and leak internal network details?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfilter: nf_nat_sip: rewind offset when NAT shrinks the packet&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sashiko says:
 If map_addr() changes the packet length, such as when the public NAT IP
 string is shorter or longer than the internal IP, coff will still point to
 the offset relative to the pre-mangled packet.
 If the packet shrinks, coff could overshoot the correct position,
 potentially causing the next ct_sip_parse_header_uri() call to silently
 skip bytes and miss subsequent Contact headers. Could this lead to a
 failure to NAT those subsequent headers and leak internal network details?&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-hw8v-4xhx-cmhp</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11893-1 — kernel-devel-7.2.8-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11893-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.2.8-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.2.8-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11893-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-100070</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-100070</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_nat_sip: rewind offset when NAT shrinks the packet sashiko says:  If map_addr() changes the packet length, such as when the public NAT IP  string is shorter or longer than the internal IP, coff will still point to  the offset relative to the pre-mangled packet.  If the packet shrinks, coff could overshoot the correct position,  potentially causing the next ct_sip_parse_header_uri() call to silently  skip bytes and miss subsequent Contact headers. Could this lead to a  failure to NAT those subsequent headers and leak internal network details?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_nat_sip: rewind offset when NAT shrinks the packet sashiko says:  If map_addr() changes the packet length, such as when the public NAT IP  string is shorter or longer than the internal IP, coff will still point to  the offset relative to the pre-mangled packet.  If the packet shrinks, coff could overshoot the correct position,  potentially causing the next ct_sip_parse_header_uri() call to silently  skip bytes and miss subsequent Contact headers. Could this lead to a  failure to NAT those subsequent headers and leak internal network details?&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-100070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
