<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-06T08:18:40.128941+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-48974</id>
    <title>CVE-2022-48974 — netfilter: conntrack: fix using __this_cpu_add in preemptible</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T08:18:40.433176+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>netfilter: conntrack: fix using __this_cpu_add in preemptible</p>
<p>Currently in nf_conntrack_hash_check_insert(), when it fails in
nf_ct_ext_valid_pre/post(), NF_CT_STAT_INC() will be called in the
preemptible context, a call trace can be triggered:</p>
<p>BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: conntrack/1636
   caller is nf_conntrack_hash_check_insert+0x45/0x430 [nf_conntrack]
   Call Trace:
    &lt;TASK&gt;
    dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x46
    check_preemption_disabled+0xc3/0xf0
    nf_conntrack_hash_check_insert+0x45/0x430 [nf_conntrack]
    ctnetlink_create_conntrack+0x3cd/0x4e0 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
    ctnetlink_new_conntrack+0x1c0/0x450 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
    nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x277/0x2f0 [nfnetlink]
    netlink_rcv_skb+0x50/0x100
    nfnetlink_rcv+0x65/0x144 [nfnetlink]
    netlink_unicast+0x1ae/0x290
    netlink_sendmsg+0x257/0x4f0
    sock_sendmsg+0x5f/0x70</p>
<p>This patch is to fix it by changing to use NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC() for
nf_ct_ext_valid_pre/post() check in nf_conntrack_hash_check_insert(),
as well as nf_ct_ext_valid_post() in __nf_conntrack_confirm().</p>
<p>Note that nf_ct_ext_valid_pre() check in __nf_conntrack_confirm() is
safe to use NF_CT_STAT_INC(), as it's under local_bh_disable().</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-48974"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
