Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.20, the KleverUpdateAccountPermission built-in authorizes replacement of a target account's permissions by checking attacker-controlled vmInput.RecipientAddr instead of authenticated vmInput.CallerAddr. An attacker-controlled contract can choose a victim account with configured permissions as RecipientAddr, and contractHasValidPermission can accept the victim's default self-signer as authorization. UpdatePermission can then replace the victim's entire permission set with attacker-supplied Owner permissions, enabling asset theft or permanent lockout without a victim key or signature. Accounts without stored permissions and the native transaction path are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.20.

Affected: Go: github.com/klever-io/klever-go

### Description

The VM built-in function `KleverUpdateAccountPermission` (registered always-active, `creator.go:381-390` / `core/vmconstants.go:234`) rewrites an account's entire permission set. Its authorization check uses `vmInput.RecipientAddr` **attacker-controlled** instead of the authenticated `vmInput.CallerAddr`. The sibling handler `kleverChangeOwnerAddress.go:86` uses `vmInput.CallerAddr` correctly, so the safe pattern exists in-repo; this handler deviates. The native transaction path (`txProcess.go:833`) is safe it uses `tx.GetSender()`.

Mechanism: 1. **Wrong variable:** `CallerAddr` is never referenced in the handler; auth is `contractHasValidPermission(target.GetPermissions(), RecipientAddr)`, which returns true if `RecipientAddr` is a signer with `Weight >= Threshold` in the *target* account's permissions and the permission grants `UpdateAccountPermissionContractType`. 2. **RecipientAddr is attacker-controlled:** when a contract calls a built-in via `ExecuteOnDestContextWithTypedArgs` (`baseOps.go:1967`), `prepareIndirectContractCallInput` (`baseOps.go:2485`) sets `RecipientAddr = destination` (contract-chosen) and `CallerAddr = the calling contract`. The blockchain hook (`blockChainHook.go:454/467`) dispatches on `input.Function` and passes the input through unchanged; no guard forces `RecipientAddr == CallerAddr` and there is no SC-destination validation on this path. 3. **Self-signer default satisfies the check:** `createDefaultOwnerPermission` (`account…