<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-01T11:10:29.616598+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-63003</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-63003</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T11:10:29.773579+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>django CMS is an easy-to-use and developer-friendly enterprise content management system powered by Django. Prior to 5.0.9, page duplication lacks an object-level authorization check on the source page. In cms/admin/forms.py, DuplicatePageForm.source accepts any Page, the AddPageForm constructor does not narrow a hidden source field, AddPageForm.clean does not validate the source against the user, and AddPageForm.save calls from_source. In cms/admin/pageadmin.py, duplicate and PageAdmin.has_add_permission check only whether a staff user may add a page. A crafted source value can therefore copy every placeholder and plugin from an unauthorized page with permissions=False, stripping source view restrictions and exposing content across sites or restricted subtrees when CMS_PERMISSION is enabled. This issue is fixed in versions 5.0.9.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-63003"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-6x92-6vx4-5fwr</id>
    <title>GHSA-6x92-6vx4-5fwr — django CMS: Broken access control in page *Duplicate* allows reading the content of any page (cross-site / restriction…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T11:10:29.773738+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: django-cms</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>The only authorization gate on the duplicate flow is `PageAdmin.has_add_permission`,
which checks `user_can_add_page(user, site)` / `user_can_add_subpage(...)` — i.e. *“may
this user create a page at all”*. Nothing checks the user’s relationship to the page being
copied:</p>
<p>- `cms/admin/forms.py` — `DuplicatePageForm.source = ModelChoiceField(queryset=Page.objects.all(), widget=HiddenInput())`
  spans **every page in the database, on every site**.
- `cms/admin/forms.py` — `AddPageForm.__init__` returns early when the `source` widget is
  hidden, so the queryset is **never narrowed** to the user’s site/subtree.
- `cms/admin/forms.py` — `AddPageForm.clean()` validates only URL uniqueness; `source` is
  never validated against the user.
- `cms/admin/pageadmin.py` — `duplicate()` seeds `source` from the URL **only on GET**; on
  POST the value comes entirely from the request body.
- `cms/admin/forms.py` — `AddPageForm.save()` → `from_source()` performs
  `source.copy(..., permissions=False)` and copies **every placeholder and all plugins** of
  `source` into a new page on the attacker’s site. Because `permissions=False` drops the
  source’s view restrictions, the resulting copy is fully readable by the attacker.</p>
<p>This crosses a real privilege boundary: a staff user restricted (via `CMS_PERMISSION`) to
their own site or subtree can exfiltrate the content of restricted pages and of pages
belonging to other tenants.</p>
<p>**Read-back is trivial (verified):** the copy is created…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-6x92-6vx4-5fwr"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-3821</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-3821 — django CMS: Broken access control in page *Duplicate* allows reading the content of any page (cross-site / restriction…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T11:10:29.773900+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: django-cms</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>The only authorization gate on the duplicate flow is `PageAdmin.has_add_permission`,
which checks `user_can_add_page(user, site)` / `user_can_add_subpage(...)` — i.e. *“may
this user create a page at all”*. Nothing checks the user’s relationship to the page being
copied:</p>
<p>- `cms/admin/forms.py` — `DuplicatePageForm.source = ModelChoiceField(queryset=Page.objects.all(), widget=HiddenInput())`
  spans **every page in the database, on every site**.
- `cms/admin/forms.py` — `AddPageForm.__init__` returns early when the `source` widget is
  hidden, so the queryset is **never narrowed** to the user’s site/subtree.
- `cms/admin/forms.py` — `AddPageForm.clean()` validates only URL uniqueness; `source` is
  never validated against the user.
- `cms/admin/pageadmin.py` — `duplicate()` seeds `source` from the URL **only on GET**; on
  POST the value comes entirely from the request body.
- `cms/admin/forms.py` — `AddPageForm.save()` → `from_source()` performs
  `source.copy(..., permissions=False)` and copies **every placeholder and all plugins** of
  `source` into a new page on the attacker’s site. Because `permissions=False` drops the
  source’s view restrictions, the resulting copy is fully readable by the attacker.</p>
<p>This crosses a real privilege boundary: a staff user restricted (via `CMS_PERMISSION`) to
their own site or subtree can exfiltrate the content of restricted pages and of pages
belonging to other tenants.</p>
<p>**Read-back is trivial (verified):** the copy is created…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-3821"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
