<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-08T21:14:40.440935+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-106440</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-106440</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T21:14:40.781520+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Hydra is a framework for elegantly configuring complex applications. From 1.2.0 until 1.3.0 and 1.4.0.dev10, the hydra-optuna-sweeper package accepts a configuration-controlled dotted path in hydra.sweeper.custom_search_space, resolves it with hydra.utils.get_method(), and later invokes the returned callable in the Hydra controller process. Because get_method() is a trusted-input lookup helper and does not apply the execution policy used by instantiate(), an attacker who controls Optuna sweep configuration or command-line overrides can select importable Python code for execution with the application's privileges, including bypassing a trusted execution whitelist on affected Hydra 1.4 development releases. This issue is fixed in versions 1.3.0 and 1.4.0.dev10.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-106440"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-5jjj-9xc3-rm56</id>
    <title>GHSA-5jjj-9xc3-rm56 — Hydra: Optuna custom_search_space can resolve and execute untrusted callables via get_method</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T21:14:40.781617+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: hydra-optuna-sweeper</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>`hydra-optuna-sweeper` accepted a configuration-controlled dotted path in
`hydra.sweeper.custom_search_space`, resolved it with the lower-level
`hydra.utils.get_method()` API, and later invoked the returned callable.</p>
<p>Hydra's object-lookup helpers intentionally trust their input and do not apply
the execution policy used by `instantiate()` and logging configuration. As a
result, untrusted Optuna multirun configuration could select installed Python
code for execution in the Hydra controller process.</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>Exploitation requires control of an application's Optuna sweep configuration
or command-line overrides and an importable callable in the application's
environment. Selected code runs with the privileges of the application.</p>
<p>On affected Hydra 1.4 development releases, this path bypasses an execution
whitelist provided by trusted application code. Hydra 1.3 has no execution-whitelist
security boundary; there, the same change restores the legacy blocklist as
defense in depth.</p>
<p>## Fix</p>
<p>The Optuna sweeper now resolves the configured callback through
`hydra.utils.instantiate()` as a partial callable. On Hydra 1.4, the active
execution whitelist therefore authorizes the callback before use. On Hydra
1.3, the legacy blocklist is applied as defense in depth.</p>
<p>The public `get_object()`, `get_method()`, `get_static_method()`, and
`get_class()` helpers remain lower-level trusted-input APIs. Their documentation
now warns against passing values derived from untrusted con…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-5jjj-9xc3-rm56"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
