<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-05T23:10:34.350922+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-61732</id>
    <title>CVE-2025-61732 — Potential code smuggling via doc comments in cmd/cgo</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T23:10:35.542910+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Go toolchain cmd/cgo, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions and 23 more</p>
<p>A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-61732"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-fqw6-gf59-qr4w</id>
    <title>GHSA-fqw6-gf59-qr4w — containerd user ID handling bypass allows runAsNonRoot evasion</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T23:10:35.545542+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Go: github.com/containerd/containerd, Go: github.com/containerd/containerd/v2</p>
<p>### Impact
A bug was found in containerd where containers launched with a numeric `User` directive that cannot be parsed as a 32-bit integer are incorrectly treated as a username. If a crafted image provides an `/etc/passwd` file mapping this large numeric string to root, the container ultimately runs as root (UID 0). This allows the Kubernetes `runAsNonRoot` restriction to be bypassed, causing unexpected behavior for environments that require containers to run as a non-root user.</p>
<p>### Patches
This bug has been fixed in the following containerd versions:</p>
<p>* 2.3.1
* 2.2.4
* 2.0.9
* 1.7.32</p>
<p>Note: The containerd 2.1 release has reached its [end of life](https://containerd.io/releases/#current-state-of-containerd-releases) and a fixed version is not provided.</p>
<p>Users should update to these versions to resolve the issue.</p>
<p>### Workarounds
Ensure that only trusted images are used and that only trusted users have permissions to import images. Alternatively, enforcing a specific numeric `runAsUser` in the Kubernetes Pod `securityContext` overrides the `USER` directive in the image and prevents the bypass. Newer versions of Kubernetes, starting with 1.34, also appear to enforce `runAsNonRoot` properly regardless of this bug.</p>
<p>### Credits
The containerd project would like to thank Lei Wang (@ssst0n3) for responsibly disclosing this issue in accordance with the [containerd security policy](https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/main/SECURITY.md).</p>
<p>### Resources
* https://github.com/a…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-fqw6-gf59-qr4w"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
