<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-05T03:42:08.429121+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-72203</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-72203 — ntfs: skip extent mft records in writeback to prevent deadlock</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T03:42:08.447118+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>ntfs: skip extent mft records in writeback to prevent deadlock</p>
<p>This patch fixes the ABBA deadlock between extent_lock and extent
mrec_lock triggered by xfstests generic/113, that occurs since the commit
6994acf33bae ("ntfs: use base mft_no when looking up base inode for
		extent record").</p>
<p>Path A (inode writeback):
  VFS writeback
    -&gt; ntfs_write_inode()
      -&gt; __ntfs_write_inode()
        -&gt; mutex_lock(&amp;ni-&gt;extent_lock)
        -&gt; mutex_lock(&amp;tni-&gt;mrec_lock)</p>
<p>Path B (MFT folio writeback):
  VFS writeback of $MFT dirty folios
    -&gt; ntfs_mft_writepages()
      -&gt; ntfs_write_mft_block()
        -&gt; ntfs_may_write_mft_record()
          -&gt; holds one extent mrec_lock from a previous iteration
          -&gt; tries to acquire another base inode extent_lock</p>
<p>By removing all extent_lock and extent mrec_lock acquisition from the MFT
folio writeback path, the ABBA lock ordering is eliminated:</p>
<p>Path A: __ntfs_write_inode(): extent_lock -&gt; mrec_lock
Path B (removed): ntfs_write_mft_block(): mrec_lock -&gt; extent_lock</p>
<p>Path B is always redundant for extent records because:</p>
<p>1. mark_mft_record_dirty(ext_ni) does NOT dirty the MFT folio.
   It only sets NInoDirty(ext_ni) and marks the base VFS inode dirty
   via __mark_inode_dirty(I_DIRTY_DATASYNC), which triggers Path A.
   Therefore, normal extent modifications never create a situation where
   the MFT folio is dirty and Path B is not scheduled.</p>
<p>2. The MFT folio only…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-72203"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
