<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-01T07:10:44.788071+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-40329</id>
    <title>CVE-2025-40329 — drm/sched: Fix deadlock in drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T07:10:45.117775+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>drm/sched: Fix deadlock in drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb</p>
<p>The Mesa issue referenced below pointed out a possible deadlock:</p>
<p>[ 1231.611031]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:</p>
<p>[ 1231.611033]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 1231.611034]        ----                    ----
[ 1231.611035]   lock(&amp;xa-&gt;xa_lock#17);
[ 1231.611038]                                local_irq_disable();
[ 1231.611039]                                lock(&amp;fence-&gt;lock);
[ 1231.611041]                                lock(&amp;xa-&gt;xa_lock#17);
[ 1231.611044]   &lt;Interrupt&gt;
[ 1231.611045]     lock(&amp;fence-&gt;lock);
[ 1231.611047]
                *** DEADLOCK ***</p>
<p>In this example, CPU0 would be any function accessing job-&gt;dependencies
through the xa_* functions that don't disable interrupts (eg:
drm_sched_job_add_dependency(), drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb()).</p>
<p>CPU1 is executing drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb() as a fence signalling
callback so in an interrupt context. It will deadlock when trying to
grab the xa_lock which is already held by CPU0.</p>
<p>Replacing all xa_* usage by their xa_*_irq counterparts would fix
this issue, but Christian pointed out another issue: dma_fence_signal
takes fence.lock and so does dma_fence_add_callback.</p>
<p>dma_fence_signal() // locks f1.lock
  -&gt; drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb()
  -&gt; foreach dependencies
     -&gt; dma_fence_add_callback() // locks f2.lock</p>
<p>This will deadlock if f1 and f2 share the same spin…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-40329"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
