<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-04T17:12:34.764825+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-26727</id>
    <title>CVE-2024-26727 — btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got read</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T17:12:34.780258+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got read</p>
<p>[BUG]
There is a syzbot crash, triggered by the ASSERT() during subvolume
creation:</p>
<p>assertion failed: !anon_dev, in fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1319
 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1319!
 invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
 RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_root_ref.part.0+0x9aa/0xa60
  &lt;TASK&gt;
  btrfs_get_new_fs_root+0xd3/0xf0
  create_subvol+0xd02/0x1650
  btrfs_mksubvol+0xe95/0x12b0
  __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x2f9/0x4f0
  btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16b/0x200
  btrfs_ioctl+0x35f0/0x5cf0
  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x210
  do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xe0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---</p>
<p>[CAUSE]
During create_subvol(), after inserting root item for the newly created
subvolume, we would trigger btrfs_get_new_fs_root() to get the
btrfs_root of that subvolume.</p>
<p>The idea here is, we have preallocated an anonymous device number for
the subvolume, thus we can assign it to the new subvolume.</p>
<p>But there is really nothing preventing things like backref walk to read
the new subvolume.
If that happens before we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root(), the subvolume
would be read out, with a new anonymous device number assigned already.</p>
<p>In that case, we would trigger ASSERT(), as we really expect no one to
read out that subvolume (which is not yet accessible from the fs).
But things like backre…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-26727"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
