<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-06T11:32:43.223131+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-52668</id>
    <title>CVE-2023-52668 — btrfs: zoned: fix lock ordering in btrfs_zone_activate()</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T11:32:43.225581+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>btrfs: zoned: fix lock ordering in btrfs_zone_activate()</p>
<p>The btrfs CI reported a lockdep warning as follows by running generic
generic/129.</p>
<p>WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
   6.7.0-rc5+ #1 Not tainted
   ------------------------------------------------------
   kworker/u5:5/793427 is trying to acquire lock:
   ffff88813256d028 (&amp;cache-&gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg+0x5e/0x130
   but task is already holding lock:
   ffff88810a23a318 (&amp;fs_info-&gt;zone_active_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg+0x34/0x130
   which lock already depends on the new lock.</p>
<p>the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
   -&gt; #1 (&amp;fs_info-&gt;zone_active_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}:
   ...
   -&gt; #0 (&amp;cache-&gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}:
   ...</p>
<p>This is because we take fs_info-&gt;zone_active_bgs_lock after a block_group's
lock in btrfs_zone_activate() while doing the opposite in other places.</p>
<p>Fix the issue by expanding the fs_info-&gt;zone_active_bgs_lock's critical
section and taking it before a block_group's lock.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-52668"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
