<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-30T00:44:12.558208+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-72289</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2026-72289</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:44:16.845120+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-72289"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1164</id>
    <title>certfr-2026-avi-1164 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:44:16.845221+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2026-avi-1164</content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1164"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-72289</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-72289</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:44:16.845251+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>KVM: arm64: vgic: Check the interrupt is still ours before migrating it</p>
<p>vgic_prune_ap_list() drops both ap_list_lock and irq_lock while migrating
an interrupt to another vCPU. After reacquiring the locks it only checks
that the affinity is unchanged (target_vcpu == vgic_target_oracle(irq))
before moving the interrupt, which assumes that an interrupt whose affinity
is preserved is still queued on this vCPU's ap_list.</p>
<p>That assumption no longer holds if the interrupt is taken off the ap_list
while the locks are dropped. vgic_flush_pending_lpis() removes the
interrupt from the list and sets irq-&gt;vcpu to NULL, but leaves
enabled/pending/target_vcpu untouched. As the interrupt is still enabled
and pending, vgic_target_oracle() returns the same target_vcpu, so the
affinity check passes and list_del() is run a second time on an entry that
has already been removed.</p>
<p>Also check that the interrupt is still assigned to this vCPU
(irq-&gt;vcpu == vcpu) before moving it.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-72289"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-j2wf-f982-8f9v</id>
    <title>GHSA-j2wf-f982-8f9v</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:44:16.845323+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>KVM: arm64: vgic: Check the interrupt is still ours before migrating it</p>
<p>vgic_prune_ap_list() drops both ap_list_lock and irq_lock while migrating
an interrupt to another vCPU. After reacquiring the locks it only checks
that the affinity is unchanged (target_vcpu == vgic_target_oracle(irq))
before moving the interrupt, which assumes that an interrupt whose affinity
is preserved is still queued on this vCPU's ap_list.</p>
<p>That assumption no longer holds if the interrupt is taken off the ap_list
while the locks are dropped. vgic_flush_pending_lpis() removes the
interrupt from the list and sets irq-&gt;vcpu to NULL, but leaves
enabled/pending/target_vcpu untouched. As the interrupt is still enabled
and pending, vgic_target_oracle() returns the same target_vcpu, so the
affinity check passes and list_del() is run a second time on an entry that
has already been removed.</p>
<p>Also check that the interrupt is still assigned to this vCPU
(irq-&gt;vcpu == vcpu) before moving it.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-j2wf-f982-8f9v"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21910-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:21910-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:44:16.845358+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21910-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/suse-su-2026:23477-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23477-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:44:16.846393+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/suse-su-2026:23477-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-72289</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-72289</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:44:16.847036+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0 and 239 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: arm64: vgic: Check the interrupt is still ours before migrating it vgic_prune_ap_list() drops both ap_list_lock and irq_lock while migrating an interrupt to another vCPU. After reacquiring the locks it only checks that the affinity is unchanged (target_vcpu == vgic_target_oracle(irq)) before moving the interrupt, which assumes that an interrupt whose affinity is preserved is still queued on this vCPU's ap_list. That assumption no longer holds if the interrupt is taken off the ap_list while the locks are dropped. vgic_flush_pending_lpis() removes the interrupt from the list and sets irq-&gt;vcpu to NULL, but leaves enabled/pending/target_vcpu untouched. As the interrupt is still enabled and pending, vgic_target_oracle() returns the same target_vcpu, so the affinity check passes and list_del() is run a second time on an entry that has already been removed. Also check that the interrupt is still assigned to this vCPU (irq-&gt;vcpu == vcpu) before moving it.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-72289"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2852</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2852 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:44:16.847415+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2852"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
