<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-11T05:04:39.287841+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-61443</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-61443</title>
    <updated>2026-10-11T05:04:39.613233+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>PraisonAI before 1.6.78 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in SkillTools.run_skill_script() that executes scripts without path containment validation. Attackers can supply absolute file paths to execute arbitrary scripts from any filesystem location, including those outside the intended working directory.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-61443"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-c44f-37qr-gw3f</id>
    <title>GHSA-c44f-37qr-gw3f — PraisonAI: SkillTools Executes Scripts Without Path Containment Validation</title>
    <updated>2026-10-11T05:04:39.613328+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: praisonaiagents</p>
<p>### Summary
`SkillTools.run_skill_script()` accepts a `script_path` parameter and executes it via `subprocess.run()` without any path containment validation. While `FileTools` has `_validate_path()` with traversal detection, `SkillTools` performs none. An LLM-directed call can execute arbitrary scripts from any filesystem location. The `@require_approval` decorator can be bypassed via YAML `approve:` for high-risk tools.</p>
<p>### Details
`src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/tools/skill_tools.py` (lines 69-119):</p>
<p>```python
def run_skill_script(self, script_path: str, ...):
    script_path = os.path.expanduser(script_path)
    if not os.path.isabs(script_path):
        script_path = os.path.join(self._working_directory, script_path)
    script_path = os.path.abspath(script_path)</p>
<p>if not os.path.exists(script_path):
        return f"Error: Script not found at {script_path}"</p>
<p># No path traversal check, no containment validation
    # Directly executes whatever is at that path:
    result = subprocess.run(cmd, ...)
```</p>
<p>By contrast, `FileTools._validate_path()` (`src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/tools/file_tools.py`, lines 42-78) properly validates that the resolved path stays within the working directory:</p>
<p>```python
def _validate_path(self, filepath: str) -&gt; str:
    # ...
    cwd = os.path.abspath(os.getcwd())
    if os.path.commonpath([absolute, cwd]) != cwd:
        raise ValueError(f"Path traversal detected: {filepath} escapes workspace {cwd}")
```</p>
<p>`SkillTools` has…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-c44f-37qr-gw3f"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
