<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-08T23:53:28.705574+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-47413</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-47413</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T23:53:28.707073+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have aprivilege escalation / cross-tenant member injection. The `POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members` endpoint is gated only by `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` (default `min_role="member"`) and forwards the request body's `user_id` and `role` straight into `MemberService.add(workspace_id, user_id, role)`, which has no caller-permission check. A user with the lowest workspace privilege can add any user (including a new attacker-controlled second account, or an existing account they want to grief) as owner of the workspace. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-47413"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-8g2p-pqm3-fcfh</id>
    <title>GHSA-8g2p-pqm3-fcfh — praisonai-platform: Any workspace member can add arbitrary user as owner via POST /workspaces/{id}/members</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T23:53:28.707138+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: praisonai-platform</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>**Type:** Privilege escalation / cross-tenant member injection. The `POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members` endpoint is gated only by `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` (default `min_role="member"`) and forwards the request body's `user_id` and `role` straight into `MemberService.add(workspace_id, user_id, role)`, which has no caller-permission check. A user with the lowest workspace privilege can add any user (including a new attacker-controlled second account, or an existing account they want to grief) as owner of the workspace.
**File:** `src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py`, lines 92-101; `services/member_service.py`, lines 26-38.
**Root cause:** `MemberService.add` validates only that `role` is in `VALID_ROLES = {"owner", "admin", "member"}` — the value, not the caller's right to assign it. The route's `Depends(require_workspace_member)` resolves to the default `min_role="member"`. So a member-level token plus one POST gives the attacker an alternate identity with owner role inside the same workspace, bypassing every owner-only operation that *would* otherwise gate them.</p>
<p>## Affected Code</p>
<p>**File 1:** `src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py`, lines 92-101.</p>
<p>```python
@router.post("/{workspace_id}/members", response_model=MemberResponse, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
async def add_member(
    workspace_id: str,
    body: MemberAdd,
    user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_memb…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-8g2p-pqm3-fcfh"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-480</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-480 — praisonai-platform: Any workspace member can add arbitrary user as owner via POST /workspaces/{id}/members</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T23:53:28.707218+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: praisonai-platform</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>**Type:** Privilege escalation / cross-tenant member injection. The `POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members` endpoint is gated only by `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` (default `min_role="member"`) and forwards the request body's `user_id` and `role` straight into `MemberService.add(workspace_id, user_id, role)`, which has no caller-permission check. A user with the lowest workspace privilege can add any user (including a new attacker-controlled second account, or an existing account they want to grief) as owner of the workspace.
**File:** `src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py`, lines 92-101; `services/member_service.py`, lines 26-38.
**Root cause:** `MemberService.add` validates only that `role` is in `VALID_ROLES = {"owner", "admin", "member"}` — the value, not the caller's right to assign it. The route's `Depends(require_workspace_member)` resolves to the default `min_role="member"`. So a member-level token plus one POST gives the attacker an alternate identity with owner role inside the same workspace, bypassing every owner-only operation that *would* otherwise gate them.</p>
<p>## Affected Code</p>
<p>**File 1:** `src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py`, lines 92-101.</p>
<p>```python
@router.post("/{workspace_id}/members", response_model=MemberResponse, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
async def add_member(
    workspace_id: str,
    body: MemberAdd,
    user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_memb…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-480"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
